One thing i cant stand is tempermental artists. Back when i actually took classes i had to endure so many assholes who thought they were teachers. To be a teacher you need more then attitude, you need character. Most those jerks would praise someone who blew paint outta their ass while condemning some illustrator who actually wanted a paycheck.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 534 x 691px
File Size 110 kB
Listed in Folders
Thought you'd get a kick out of it. Thank God Japan has it's head screwed on right about it. Osamu Tezuka made sure of that. :)
And no problem. If you want to see more good stuff like that, a watch to my FA page
OtakuMan24 is a great way. It's also a great way of saying thanks.
*Plug Plug Plug*
~Otaku-Man
P.S. I'm on a Tezuka kick. So sue me. :P
And no problem. If you want to see more good stuff like that, a watch to my FA page
OtakuMan24 is a great way. It's also a great way of saying thanks.*Plug Plug Plug*
~Otaku-Man
P.S. I'm on a Tezuka kick. So sue me. :P
Hahaha!
The thing I don't like in the art world are those few "artists" who are payed hundred of thousands of pounds for crap they chucked on the floor randomly. I think it's not due to people buying it just because of the actual "work" but because it's by someone who is famous/revered by the elite of the artistic community.
The thing I don't like in the art world are those few "artists" who are payed hundred of thousands of pounds for crap they chucked on the floor randomly. I think it's not due to people buying it just because of the actual "work" but because it's by someone who is famous/revered by the elite of the artistic community.
I've always considered art critics to be as meaningful as braille on a drive-thru ATM. Art means different things to different people. While the message can be fairly universal, it is human nature to perceive it in a manner completely unique to the individual. Those who follow the prattling of critics in order to seem cultured usually lack originality and are basically lemmings.
Yet so many of these "tempermental artists," as you call them, have enriched the world of art and (in my view) expanded our knowledge of human vision and of human experience: Van Gogh, Munch, Gericault, Rossetti, Blake, Durer, Dadd, Rembrandt, Vermeer.... Would we as a culture have gained anything, had they been "normal" people who painted for greeting card and cereal companies? I have my doubts. ;)
Mark
Mark
If I can hazard a guess at Alexspastic's original gripe, it is not that he would dismiss the cultural contribution of a tempermental artist's artwork. But that he has a hard time working near them, and they degrade him because he makes an effort to integrate his art into business ("..condemning some illustrator who actually wanted a paycheck."), something no one should be condemned for doing.
Okay... with that point I could agree! ;)
Yet even then, I still have to think about Van Gogh. His early work was *extremely* weak (his people were misproportioned to the point of deformity) and there was no indication whatsoever of the artist that he would become. Yet he persevered... which might reveal the truth about "character over attitude," as Alex described it.
Yet even then, I still have to think about Van Gogh. His early work was *extremely* weak (his people were misproportioned to the point of deformity) and there was no indication whatsoever of the artist that he would become. Yet he persevered... which might reveal the truth about "character over attitude," as Alex described it.
Behold: http://www.sothebys.com/video/privateview/
No, the video is not a joke. It's a prime example on the breakdown of objective asthetics in modern art. This is indicated by the absurdly abstract designs in which the viewer literally "makes up" what the painting may be about, and the emotions it supposedly conveys. This means it could be anything and everything. Metaphysically, if something can be anything and everything, it is, in objective reality, nothing at all. That's what's been painted.
No, the video is not a joke. It's a prime example on the breakdown of objective asthetics in modern art. This is indicated by the absurdly abstract designs in which the viewer literally "makes up" what the painting may be about, and the emotions it supposedly conveys. This means it could be anything and everything. Metaphysically, if something can be anything and everything, it is, in objective reality, nothing at all. That's what's been painted.
FA+

Comments