1248 submissions
More Patreon-sponsored court hijinks, this time featuring Emily by
Ty Vulpintaur
I think this is her first case...
Ty VulpintaurI think this is her first case...
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Vulpine (Other)
Size 755 x 1280px
File Size 254.1 kB
Listed in Folders
Technically, that ISN'T leading the witness, and that objection would be overruled. Leading the witness would be, "Of course, you saw landmark X from milepost 499, correct?". A proper question would be, "Were there any landmarks or unique features visible at the site of the accident?" which could lead-in to introducing witnesses that may have been AT the landmark.
It's a very easy mistake to make, particularly for a new lawyer.
It's a very easy mistake to make, particularly for a new lawyer.
*nods* True. Though being objected to can still throw you off of your train of thought, so I've seen plenty of defense lawyers do it even when they know they'll get overruled.
First job I ever had was in a courthouse. Entry level temp. position, but even that kind of position will let you overhear plenty.
First job I ever had was in a courthouse. Entry level temp. position, but even that kind of position will let you overhear plenty.
I just pictured something like this ...
http://www.uisgebeatha.org/redroada.....100-0016_2.jpg
In which case the answer would be:
"Yes. The most prominent and unique feature at the location, for about a mile both up and down the road, would be a little black sign at the roadside with the number 499 printed on it."
A more helpful answer would have been. "It's about 2/3rd of that 150 mile long straight section leading west from Ghost Town. There's absolutely nothing out there. But 20 miles further down there's the burnt out wreck of a pickup to the side of the road, it's been there since the 60s. Tragic story back then, my dad was called to the scene..."
But how do you ask the question to get that answer, if a witness wants to be smartass?
FA+

Comments