So basically I was told that because I didn't kept the original .clip file for them to run it by some "anti-AI tool" (the picture was like half a year old and let's be honest - how many of you keep the original files?) the work is automatically and forever claimed to be at least "AI assisted or with used assets". Which bamboozle me as for example assets using is not prohibited in the rules yet it was used as possible reason for the work to be left taken down.

The conclussion is that I should do LESS polished work, so I wouldn't be flagged again in the future. imagine that. I hope you take it as a bad joke as I did and lets hope another "oopsie" won't happen again in the future.

Fun fact: I found internet AI detection tool and white paper is considered to be 48% AI generated for its "unnatural uniformity of colors"