Rahonavis ostromi
Rahonavis ostromi. Learned a lot about feather layering from a 2012 paper on the amount of covert layers in relation to the placement of the organism in evolutionary time. Level of layers are like that of Archaeopteryx in this iteration.
Media: Canson Universal Sketch paper, 5 x 8 inches; .05 mechanical pencil.
Time: Roughly 4-5 hours.
Paper:
Nicholas R. Longrich, Jakob Vinther, Qingjin Meng, Quangguo Li, Anthony P. Russell,
Primitive Wing Feather Arrangement in Archaeopteryx lithographica and Anchiornis huxleyi,
Current Biology,
Volume 22, Issue 23,
2012,
Pages 2262-2267,
ISSN 0960-9822,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.052.
( https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien.....60982212011943 )
Abstract: Summary
In modern birds (Neornithes), the wing is composed of a layer of long, asymmetrical flight feathers overlain by short covert feathers <<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>. It has generally been assumed that wing feathers in the Jurassic bird Archaeopteryx [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] and Cretaceous feathered dinosaurs [10, 11] had the same arrangement. Here, we redescribe the wings of the archaic bird Archaeopteryx lithographica [3, 4, 5] and the dinosaur Anchiornis huxleyi [12, 13] and show that their wings differ from those of Neornithes in being composed of multiple layers of feathers. In Archaeopteryx, primaries are overlapped by long dorsal and ventral coverts. Anchiornis has a similar configuration but is more primitive in having short, slender, symmetrical remiges. Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis therefore appear to represent early experiments in the evolution of the wing. This primitive configuration has important functional implications: although the slender feather shafts of Archaeopteryx [14] and Anchiornis [12] make individual feathers weak, layering of the wing feathers may have produced a strong airfoil. Furthermore, the layered arrangement may have prevented the feathers from forming a slotted tip or separating to reduce drag on the upstroke. The wings of early birds therefore may have lacked the range of functions seen in Neornithes, limiting their flight ability.
Media: Canson Universal Sketch paper, 5 x 8 inches; .05 mechanical pencil.
Time: Roughly 4-5 hours.
Paper:
Nicholas R. Longrich, Jakob Vinther, Qingjin Meng, Quangguo Li, Anthony P. Russell,
Primitive Wing Feather Arrangement in Archaeopteryx lithographica and Anchiornis huxleyi,
Current Biology,
Volume 22, Issue 23,
2012,
Pages 2262-2267,
ISSN 0960-9822,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.052.
( https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien.....60982212011943 )
Abstract: Summary
In modern birds (Neornithes), the wing is composed of a layer of long, asymmetrical flight feathers overlain by short covert feathers <<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>. It has generally been assumed that wing feathers in the Jurassic bird Archaeopteryx [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] and Cretaceous feathered dinosaurs [10, 11] had the same arrangement. Here, we redescribe the wings of the archaic bird Archaeopteryx lithographica [3, 4, 5] and the dinosaur Anchiornis huxleyi [12, 13] and show that their wings differ from those of Neornithes in being composed of multiple layers of feathers. In Archaeopteryx, primaries are overlapped by long dorsal and ventral coverts. Anchiornis has a similar configuration but is more primitive in having short, slender, symmetrical remiges. Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis therefore appear to represent early experiments in the evolution of the wing. This primitive configuration has important functional implications: although the slender feather shafts of Archaeopteryx [14] and Anchiornis [12] make individual feathers weak, layering of the wing feathers may have produced a strong airfoil. Furthermore, the layered arrangement may have prevented the feathers from forming a slotted tip or separating to reduce drag on the upstroke. The wings of early birds therefore may have lacked the range of functions seen in Neornithes, limiting their flight ability.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Dinosaur
Size 1662 x 2217px
File Size 970.8 kB
That would be so so cool to see. It seems that Rahonavis had a greater upward range of motion in the humerus, so it was more capable of stronger powered flight than Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis, so it very well could have been more within the range of the more volant grouse, turkey, and/or other galliforme species in terms of flight capability.
FA+

Comments