Question Regarding Thumbnails
2 years ago
General
So now that my new thumbnails have been around for a while, what’s the consensus? A lot of people didn’t like them. Have they grown on you, or do you still not like them? No wrong answer.
FA+

I like the previous design better because it showed the animal from the transformation story and it was a good indication of the cover of the story.
The current design is very simple, that's all.
One tool FA has is gallery folders and I think you could group stories that into folders to aid new readers. One example is the new story https://www.furaffinity.net/view/56092298/. I clicked it at first because of the Smilodon picture which caught my eye, but I didn't realize it was a part of the Lateral Move world until I started reading it and identified familiar characters.
The problem with listing kinks is that either the text is too small or it's just too generic. I don't really venture into specific fetish niches (I think), so my "kink tags" on the thumbnail just end up being pretty meaningless ("Boobs R Here," "People Fuck," etc.).
I've thought about using folders, but grouping stories into ongoing universes just seems like a bad idea all around. Sequels get nowhere near the viewership as originals, and I fear that having half my stories be in a folder relating to that world will turn viewers off of reading. Even if they don't have to read twelve stories to make sense out of a new one, I think people will assume the opposite is true if they're grouped in some way.
FA's thumbnails kinda blow for stories. But anyway, thanks for the input!
Honestly, I feel like a lot of times when authors use "tags" on their thumbnails it just makes me want to skip over them without giving the story a chance. If I see a tag I'm not interested in, I just move along, and I'm guessing a lot of other people do too. I dunno, but welcome any outside feedback.