FA+
Shop
Furries
20 years ago
General
So we all know that Furries can't handle critique to their fandom, that�s a given. I am here to try and disprove that and maybe show that there are furries out there who maybe can take critique like men and let people have their opinions. I mean, it's only fair us non-furs get to have our opinions just like the furries do? It's only fair we get to voice publicly our feelings on the matter when countless furries are allowed to upload their drek publicly, voice their vile fetishes to the world and whine and angst foolishly like children at the mere notion that someone out there doesn't fap off to their badly drawn tripe.
However, I know deep down in my heart that there are no furries out there who can handle a difference of opinion. I know that I will most likely be banned and that my journal entry here will be erased. That�s alright, I am not here for the sake of having an art archive on some dingy, badly coded and put together DeviantART rip off, I am here to prove a point, and if this journal is deleted, and if I am banned, my point will have been proven, and I will have won.
Now let�s start off with the simple points:
Furries like animals sexually.
Now I KNOW there will be furries who will post here and say things like �Furries are not animals, they are anthropomorphic humanoids!�
But guess what? You add animal cock/face/features to a humanoid, and you are getting a boner over an animal that can talk.
I am sorry but furry porn is bestiality, it just is � there is no argument. How can furries get boners over animal shaped cock, animal sex and animal features and then have the gall to claim that it isn�t animal sex/porn?
And lets be honest (despite the fact 90% of the fandom denies this) at least 98% of the fandom have sexual relations with animals, even in small ways like just masturbating over a cat or something� it�s all too obvious. Or what about the ones who have made it with their toys? TOYS!
This brings me to another point:
Furries tend to be VERY closed minded to things such as pedo-art, despite their own art being just as, if not MORE twisted.
How can a bunch of people who draw pornographic images of children�s characters from CHILDRENS shows/games/books etc DARE have a problem with pedo art? The fact they are associating sex with things that were made for little kids sort of crosses the pedo line right there.
Also a group of people who make it with children�s toys, nah that isn�t paedophilic is it? Course not; cause furries can magically change reality to suit their own whims.
My point is, furries are paedophiles by very definition.
So this sub culture is a bunch of paedophilic, beastophiles who have the audacity to want acceptance?
But that�s not all��.
Furries whine, and whine��.. aaaaaaaand whine for acceptance. That�s all they want right? To just be accepted, to be left alone so they can enjoy doing things that don�t hurt anyone. And that�s okay right?
Well it would be if the hypocritical bunch of children known as the furry fandom could even accept those amongst their OWN stupid groups.
I have been witness to so many insider wars, between furries and other furries. What the hell is it all about? You say you all want to be accepted, and that you all want to just be left alone and understood; yet you ridicule the very fabric of your little messed up societies on the Internet.
How does that reflect well on you all to us outsiders? How can we possibly take this sub culture (I wouldn�t call it that personally, I see it more as a bunch of messed up adults who need therapy, or a gas chamber � whichever seems fitting) seriously, and how can WE accept all of you, when you cant even accept yourselves?
I have a lot more to say on the �furries�, I have written up a few essays on this subject, had them printed. That�s sort of my job, I write things about interesting yet messed up individuals, and yet at the same time try and reach some form of enlightenment on the matter.
I don�t think I can ever understand furries, I don�t think I can ever BEGIN to comprehend what attracts adults to a fandom based on childish things such as cartoons, games and animals, and I will never be able to fathom how ANY sub culture could be so full of hypocrisy, flawed minds, twisted and depraved view points, and such bullshit.
Furries, please tell me. Why? That is all.
However, I know deep down in my heart that there are no furries out there who can handle a difference of opinion. I know that I will most likely be banned and that my journal entry here will be erased. That�s alright, I am not here for the sake of having an art archive on some dingy, badly coded and put together DeviantART rip off, I am here to prove a point, and if this journal is deleted, and if I am banned, my point will have been proven, and I will have won.
Now let�s start off with the simple points:
Furries like animals sexually.
Now I KNOW there will be furries who will post here and say things like �Furries are not animals, they are anthropomorphic humanoids!�
But guess what? You add animal cock/face/features to a humanoid, and you are getting a boner over an animal that can talk.
I am sorry but furry porn is bestiality, it just is � there is no argument. How can furries get boners over animal shaped cock, animal sex and animal features and then have the gall to claim that it isn�t animal sex/porn?
And lets be honest (despite the fact 90% of the fandom denies this) at least 98% of the fandom have sexual relations with animals, even in small ways like just masturbating over a cat or something� it�s all too obvious. Or what about the ones who have made it with their toys? TOYS!
This brings me to another point:
Furries tend to be VERY closed minded to things such as pedo-art, despite their own art being just as, if not MORE twisted.
How can a bunch of people who draw pornographic images of children�s characters from CHILDRENS shows/games/books etc DARE have a problem with pedo art? The fact they are associating sex with things that were made for little kids sort of crosses the pedo line right there.
Also a group of people who make it with children�s toys, nah that isn�t paedophilic is it? Course not; cause furries can magically change reality to suit their own whims.
My point is, furries are paedophiles by very definition.
So this sub culture is a bunch of paedophilic, beastophiles who have the audacity to want acceptance?
But that�s not all��.
Furries whine, and whine��.. aaaaaaaand whine for acceptance. That�s all they want right? To just be accepted, to be left alone so they can enjoy doing things that don�t hurt anyone. And that�s okay right?
Well it would be if the hypocritical bunch of children known as the furry fandom could even accept those amongst their OWN stupid groups.
I have been witness to so many insider wars, between furries and other furries. What the hell is it all about? You say you all want to be accepted, and that you all want to just be left alone and understood; yet you ridicule the very fabric of your little messed up societies on the Internet.
How does that reflect well on you all to us outsiders? How can we possibly take this sub culture (I wouldn�t call it that personally, I see it more as a bunch of messed up adults who need therapy, or a gas chamber � whichever seems fitting) seriously, and how can WE accept all of you, when you cant even accept yourselves?
I have a lot more to say on the �furries�, I have written up a few essays on this subject, had them printed. That�s sort of my job, I write things about interesting yet messed up individuals, and yet at the same time try and reach some form of enlightenment on the matter.
I don�t think I can ever understand furries, I don�t think I can ever BEGIN to comprehend what attracts adults to a fandom based on childish things such as cartoons, games and animals, and I will never be able to fathom how ANY sub culture could be so full of hypocrisy, flawed minds, twisted and depraved view points, and such bullshit.
Furries, please tell me. Why? That is all.
