1248 submissions
My fancy showcase picture for the FC art show (did not sell. *sigh*) Reffed from a magazine ad for some stupid TV show I never watched called Happy Endings. In retrospect, I should've put hair on the female characters, because the genders are kind of ambiguous without it. For the record, the tiger, red panda and snow leopard are supposed to be the females. Yes, all those folds in the sheet took forever to do.
Watercolor and some ink.
Watercolor and some ink.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 964 x 898px
File Size 152.9 kB
Listed in Folders
I'm quite a bit more versatile as an artist than most people think. I don't do this style a lot because it's a hassle. But I'm capable of doing multiple styles-- I usually don't just because I have no interest in it (such as abstract) or it's too time-consuming (like this more realistic style).
I honestly don't think the problem was with genders. Being ambiguous is GOOD. I think the problem really lies with the white space. When I first saw this in the art show, it took me a minute to realize what it was. At first glance, it was so much wrinkly sheets. The sheets are amazingly rendered, but most of the picture is just wrinkled white sheet. Having a lot of white space or background is sometimes what makes a picture interesting, but it doesn't really work in this one. Perhaps it would have been visually more interesting if more of their lovely fur patterning was showing, and less white sheet.
And yes, the art show was pretty slow this year. I heard the highest piece went for $600. That's it. I can't remember the last time I was at a Con where *none* of the pieces made it to $1000.
And yes, the art show was pretty slow this year. I heard the highest piece went for $600. That's it. I can't remember the last time I was at a Con where *none* of the pieces made it to $1000.
Huh, never thought of that. One of the hazards of using a photo is that you're stuck with what it shows. Well, it was an interesting picture to do in any event. This art show was kind of an experiment to see if it was worth my while to put stuff in shows again, and while I did sell half of what was put in, it was all the cheapest things and I don't think I even cleared $100, so it appears the answer is a big "No!"
I know we've speculated on the decline of art show profits (for everyone.) Is it the glut of really good artists, or the piss-poor economy, the internet assumption that everything should be free, or fandom demographics changing to younger people more interested in parties than artwork? Granted I didn't follow the bidding closely, but it seemed down for everyone except a few of the top A-list artists. I guess the highly lucrative art shows are another convention hilight we'll never get back.
I know we've speculated on the decline of art show profits (for everyone.) Is it the glut of really good artists, or the piss-poor economy, the internet assumption that everything should be free, or fandom demographics changing to younger people more interested in parties than artwork? Granted I didn't follow the bidding closely, but it seemed down for everyone except a few of the top A-list artists. I guess the highly lucrative art shows are another convention hilight we'll never get back.
FA+

Comments