Let's suppose that the Japanese committee that designed the 2007 Hugo for Nippon had given the matter a little more thought. Suppose they had decided that however beloved Ultraman was in their own country, hardly anyone in the rest of the world had a smegging clue who Ultraman was. Suppose further they had decided to choose a Japanese popular culture icon more comprehensible to the rest of the world. Might the Hugo have looked like this, then?
Personally, I like it. I've shown it to a number of opinion-setters in SF fandom and they all like it too. Whereas the only people in SF I've found who supported the real Hugo were the people who won one.
Personally, I like it. I've shown it to a number of opinion-setters in SF fandom and they all like it too. Whereas the only people in SF I've found who supported the real Hugo were the people who won one.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 600 x 1039px
File Size 118.1 kB
Heh, that would have been indeed a good choice, as Tezuka himself was and is still a reference for modern artists. Who still knows who created Ultraman, and what contributions he gave to the cinema/animation/comics world ?...
Independantly from the fact it is known or not outside Japan (we can't blame them for having their own references !), What you proposed is still far more logical IMHO, even if I do know Ultraman myself.
Independantly from the fact it is known or not outside Japan (we can't blame them for having their own references !), What you proposed is still far more logical IMHO, even if I do know Ultraman myself.
Because you're rubber and I'm glue... wait, that doesn't make sense, I have to rewrite that a bit... um, you're rubber and I'm glue, shame sticks to me that bounces off you?
Oh I dunno... Let's just say I don't hate you, I just find the whole idea excruciatingly funny.
Oh I dunno... Let's just say I don't hate you, I just find the whole idea excruciatingly funny.
The award is called a Hugo. It's named after the man who is generally regarded as the midwife of science fiction, a magazine editor named Hugo Gernsback. He was an advocate of "scientifiction" back in the 1920's, and in 1929 or thereabouts founded the first specialized SF pulp magainze, Astounding Stories. He was, however, what jazz aficianados would call "a moldy fig". He thought SF should teach and promote science and became quite incensed by SF written after about 1950, because it was getting distracted by social issues, characterization, alternate history, and other herasies. His contribution to the birth of modern SF was acknowledged by naming the World SF Convention's annual award after him all the same.
Astroboy does have a name, after a fashion. He was created in imitation of a son of the scientist who created him. He had a name, of course, though I forget it. You could think of it as Astroboy's "real" name too, though I don't think he was ever called by it.
Astroboy does have a name, after a fashion. He was created in imitation of a son of the scientist who created him. He had a name, of course, though I forget it. You could think of it as Astroboy's "real" name too, though I don't think he was ever called by it.
I have a recent remake of the series that the Tezuka studio produced. I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, its well done and some of the episodes are really odd and good. But other episodes are predictably "robots and humans should learn to love each other" stories with stupid fights between Astro and one ultimate robot after the next, that bore me to tears. I wish I had some idea how they compare to the original b&w cartoons.
Did you know a CGI Astroboy is coming up next year or '09 from Imagi Studios (same people who did TMNT)? Check out http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/09.....roboy-posters/
Columbia was supposed to do a live action Astroboy several years ago (with a CGI Astro), but that never happened.
Columbia was supposed to do a live action Astroboy several years ago (with a CGI Astro), but that never happened.
FA+

Comments