FA+
Shop
444
Views
Views
46
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1811 x 2034
File Size 998 kB
Report this content
More from fmirsokp
Listed in Folders
https://www.aol.com/shopping/style/.....160203276.html sincerely i just found this story a moment ago when seeking a "title" AFTER making the picture. The drawing was actually inspired by the ongoing, even in 2025, religiously nerd-stupid need to tell artists who draw this character that the legs are actually trousered, trying to enforce a cartoon joke like a law
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \|||||||||||||/ / / / / / / / / /
commission form that is completely naked
/ / / / / / / / / /|||||||||||||\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
comic strip · mastodork
bluskie· discord server
instagram · twitter
tumblr · youtube
bimshwel.com · snubscribescar
paytreon · ko-fee
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \|||||||||||||/ / / / / / / / / /
commission form that is completely naked
/ / / / / / / / / /|||||||||||||\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
comic strip · mastodork
bluskie· discord server
instagram · twitter
tumblr · youtube
bimshwel.com · snubscribescar
paytreon · ko-fee
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1811 x 2034px
File Size 998 kB
Listed in Folders
They want to understand too hard in the wrong way. it is the same sort of dorks who try to have serious debates about "cartoon physics" and "hammerspace."
They could seek out the instances where a character's fur or feathers are blasted off and they have polka dot underwear underneath, which "proves" that is actually clothing, disregarding that another animator may draw the same gag on the same character and just have bare skin there, because it isn't meant to be important or consistent.
They could seek out the instances where a character's fur or feathers are blasted off and they have polka dot underwear underneath, which "proves" that is actually clothing, disregarding that another animator may draw the same gag on the same character and just have bare skin there, because it isn't meant to be important or consistent.
Comments