Category Photography / Fetish Other
Species Dog (Other)
Size 720 x 480px
File Size 84.9 kB
When people do a search for something, that is what they want to see. In this case, there is no watersports in the picture, under any definition of the word. Falsifying the theme of a picture, or purposely using misleading keywords is indeed a violation of the TOS. Not only that, but it is waste of people's time who do the searching, and therefore a waste of FA's processor time. Violations like this contribute to the search engine being nearly in-effective for some terms. :(
Go ahead and continue to violate the rules. Don't be surprised when someone comes along and reports it to FA though. It's not about people liking or not liking watersports, or any fetishes. It's about purposely defying the rules for the lulz - which you admitted in one of your comments. If everyone did the same, we would not be able to use the search feature for anything at all. I simply mentioned that what you did is a violation, and why. It could just as easily have been over any topic. Post pictures of birds and label them as raccoons, or post drawings of gay sex and label them as con parade photos, and you'll get the same complaints - because it violates the rules.
I do that particular search only about once every one to three months. I have no idea where you get the idea that everything is about sex! Unlike many FA users, I don't even get off to the furry porn art on here. I appreciate some of it, but generally prefer non-porn art. I think the ratio of porn to non-porn on my page speaks well enough for itself. Take a look at my list of favorite artists, and tell me again that I'm here for the porn! Honestly, I've never gotten off to porn art, as I've never experienced the need. You make the false assumption that I'm in need or want of a sexual partner. That area of my life has been quite happily fulfilled since around 1979! :)
When someone admits to purposely misdirecting people's searches for the lulz, that as an insult to the site - a site that I donate to, care about and use. I would have said the same thing if I was mislead in a search for raccoons, or any other topic. It's purely the fact that a user basically admitted to trying to sabotage the effectiveness of the search engine for his own lulz. Then I see the "haters gonna hate" comment. What on earth does hate have to do with this? I simply stated a fact - that it is a violation to misled people with false picture descriptions or keywords, AFTER the poster said he did it purposely. There is no hate involved. I cannot hate someone that I don't even know!? I just want people to not screw with the site. I'm very sure the site admins will agree on this.
When someone admits to purposely misdirecting people's searches for the lulz, that as an insult to the site - a site that I donate to, care about and use. I would have said the same thing if I was mislead in a search for raccoons, or any other topic. It's purely the fact that a user basically admitted to trying to sabotage the effectiveness of the search engine for his own lulz. Then I see the "haters gonna hate" comment. What on earth does hate have to do with this? I simply stated a fact - that it is a violation to misled people with false picture descriptions or keywords, AFTER the poster said he did it purposely. There is no hate involved. I cannot hate someone that I don't even know!? I just want people to not screw with the site. I'm very sure the site admins will agree on this.
FA+

Gentoo
Comments