One of my life drawing commissions, he wanted a child character of his sans naughty bits, I think I did an alright job, kids are not something I draw often.
Art by Anka, Characters Property of Lord Baynet
Art by Anka, Characters Property of Lord Baynet
Category Artwork (Traditional) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 598 x 456px
File Size 56.5 kB
People annoy me with the "negatives" of cub-art, its as bad as how people react with lolli and shota. Personally I don't have a problem with it, why? Because it is fantasy. It is done in a cartoon way, its not real, and it does not mean someone's a pedo. Something realistic or photography of nature is terrible, but drawn, cartoony-sweet little creatures I feel there is no problem with. Personally I don't like the adult/cub type art that goes on, and I feel a little unnerved with that. But again it is fantasy, its not real. Its artwork. And personally there is some adult "yiff" out there that is so very "foul" compared to cubart that its not funny. I find it a little funny as I was thinking on this subject last night, I wanted to make a journal entry... However I also really don't want to argue with people on this subject. I say it this way, if someone doesn't like it... If they want to flame, they should keep their damn comments to themselves. Further there is nothing wrong with this piece, its very cute, very tame. Nothing wrong with it, and its not like he's drawn in a sexual way.
-Moon
-Moon
Lolli is the anime version of underage yuri, and shota the anime version of underage yaoi. Personally some of its cute but I don't really like it. I just don't have any real dislike for it, none the less its a little squicky. Ironically though in some of my rps I rp an underage person finding love with someone above 18... I'm one for fluff and love, and if its done tastefully I have no problem with it.
FA+

Comments