Still experimenting with my new technique. I wanted to have an excuse to draw a balloon in this one, and I think I did OK, but I probably could have done better. I'll have to come up with a new shading technique, but I have an idea, so that might solve my problems.
Anyway, this is probably my least favorite in my new style, but also the one that seems the least 'forced.' I dunno, the shading seems more, more in-keeping with the style, I guess. I don't know.
I had this cool idea of the balloon from his mouth pressing into his balloon-like belly, and really wanted to try it out, but somehow it just doesn't work, I don't think. Oh well, live and learn.
Anyway,
Calbeck has the balloon hiccups again . . . man he never gets a break does he?
Anyway, this is probably my least favorite in my new style, but also the one that seems the least 'forced.' I dunno, the shading seems more, more in-keeping with the style, I guess. I don't know.
I had this cool idea of the balloon from his mouth pressing into his balloon-like belly, and really wanted to try it out, but somehow it just doesn't work, I don't think. Oh well, live and learn.
Anyway,
Calbeck has the balloon hiccups again . . . man he never gets a break does he?
Category Artwork (Digital) / Inflation
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 593 x 803px
File Size 166.8 kB
Might wanna stay away from
Calbeck then, he's
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/5383778
been known
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3109917/
to start
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3120577/
balloon hiccupping
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3194121/
Problems
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3206245/ , http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3213762/ , http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4507842/
Calbeck then, he'shttp://www.furaffinity.net/view/5383778
been known
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3109917/
to start
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3120577/
balloon hiccupping
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3194121/
Problems
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3206245/ , http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3213762/ , http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4507842/
FA+

Comments