Based

AI art is for loosers who have no tallent.

But I wouldn't fear it being anythign more than a dubmass trend.

As we saw with AI art it's shit and can hardly replace the real people behind the actual work.

Much to the contray to any of the Knobjob cocksucking lazy good for shit all shcmucks who say that AI art is ligitment in the sense it's creating a 'uniuqe art form' don't relize that AI is limited in imagination by tenfold. And in all honesty none of it is really 'origonal' considering it uses an algarythm...So by that logic they're just blowing smoke to put whatever undeserved selfe esteem into themselves since they in reality are pretty stupid.

You have a point a.i is supposed to be a tool for artists not replace them

Yep

I get using it for background things (notes, minor references , or organization),but selling ai made products is a dumb move. You'll be entering a doomed market if ya do. Your work won't be protected by copyright, so you'll lose profits to its derivatives made legally by others.It's so easy and fast, the oversaturation of both comptition and product will crash its own market. And people already preferred people made over machine made, even over machines without ai. Etsy is proof of it. So anyone who thinks they can use ai to make money should look elsewhere.any AI art market isn't going to last or profit. Period!