furry family have a child, Fa appears and zaps the kid out of existence, child banished

your going to the shadowrealm jimbo.

If one ever get in trouble for a meme that is basicly "pointing at a flawed something and laught".. that would be more concerning then the last line of the meme..

also.. well done ^.^

well its more of i dont remember if posting memes is in the posting guidelines and i didnt want to go look because im lazy.

Oh for the love of... You won't get in trouble for posting children. It's posting CHILD LIKE CHARACTERS HAVING SEX That will get you banned. So long as they are not engaging in sexual themes, post away.

"Since Fur Affinity has taken the stance against fictional content featuring minors in sexual situations, we have continued to evolve our rules to prevent minors from being exploited and to ensure that our rules are equally applied.

Our most well-known change removed the classic “1000 year old loli vampire” loophole trope by expanding our definition of minors to include humanoids with childlike body proportions, including canonically adult characters who look like children. Such characters need to be aged-up accordingly (proportions changed to that of an adult) to be allowed in submissions containing sexual situations. These changes were well-received, and based upon additional feedback from our community, any reports we receive of Pokémon or Digimon who have childlike body proportions or appear as adolescent animals will be treated as any other when in the presence of sexual activity, sexual objects, nudity, or fetishized in a sexual way. This update will go into effect on July 1st, 2023.

We would like to reiterate this applies to those characters only with childlike proportions or are otherwise presented as children in sexual content as described above.

Accounts found in violation may receive a 1 week suspension and a final warning. Repeat violations may result in a permanent ban. If you believe that this change may impact your gallery, then you should delete any and all content that may violate our rules before July 1st, 2023."

If people want to engage in sexual ageplay, draw art of children being screwed, ect, then they deserve to be banned.

i just feel like it should be a case by case basis and i think they are going to be a little generous with the removal and banning is all. "expanding our definition of minors to include humanoids with childlike body proportions, including canonically adult characters who look like children. Such characters need to be aged-up accordingly (proportions changed to that of an adult) to be allowed in submissions containing sexual situations." *points at midna* midna if drawn on model fits all the criteria for your pic to get removed if you draw her being sexy.

my worry was that they might be a little ambiguous with it and skew their definition and remove stuff that doesnt have anything to do with lolis or cubs or 1000 year old vampires by mistake or otherwise. Im not defending those people i just dont think they will judge all pictures fairly when they start purging stuff.

It IS going to be on a per basis Frost. Because Midna, being a legend of Zelda, does NOT flag for child like.

The Mimiga one killed me. xD