I was lamenting to
about my inefficiency as a draftsman, when he pointed out something that wasn't as obvious as it sounded:
Of course I'm slow!
I practice being slow all the time... therefore, I've become very good..... at being slow.
No skill develops overnight, so if I want to pick up the pace, I'll need to practice being fast.
To manifest this insight is the most bare-bones digital painting I've done since learning Photoshop. ^
No gimmicks, just an observational study of the deskspace to my computer's left. One layer. One brush size at 70% opacity. No undo.
70 minutes.
Such an exercise leaves no doubt surrounding one's legitimate strengths and weaknesses. I'd better do a lot more of these. :P
about my inefficiency as a draftsman, when he pointed out something that wasn't as obvious as it sounded:Of course I'm slow!
I practice being slow all the time... therefore, I've become very good..... at being slow.
No skill develops overnight, so if I want to pick up the pace, I'll need to practice being fast.
To manifest this insight is the most bare-bones digital painting I've done since learning Photoshop. ^
No gimmicks, just an observational study of the deskspace to my computer's left. One layer. One brush size at 70% opacity. No undo.
70 minutes.
Such an exercise leaves no doubt surrounding one's legitimate strengths and weaknesses. I'd better do a lot more of these. :P
Category All / Still Life
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 800 x 580px
File Size 167.7 kB
if I were drunk this would look very realistic. just a tad and a smidge of intoxication and voila: realism! But seriously it's not a bad attempt for what you said in the description. Had I done something like this I would be way too tempted to add a filter or do some kind of of lasso magic or something. Good job all told
This friend of yours sounds like a real jerk. ;)
Heh. This image really carries what I was talking to you about. There's so much feeling in it. And that's something that tends to fade in paintings which have been worked on for countless hours.
As the laborious detail and precision goes up, the life spark tends to fade. And so there is good reason to find balance between technical excellence and speed of creation.
I have been finding in my own works that... while I feel this need to apologize for the ones I made quickly... they actually tend to be the ones people like most. I sort of want people to like the ones I labored on for countless hours better because I spent so much time on them, and they are better in a technical sense.
But in reality, appreciation of art is more emotional than technical. In the end, the life spark in a piece is more important than any other factor. As artists, we spend so much time practicing and honing our technical skills that we can easily lose sight of that truth.
I'd say the next challenge for you and me both is to get over the need to apologize for making something like this. We feel this need to make excuses for a piece we created quickly. We fear that our technical proficiencies will be unfairly judged by our least meticulous works. When the quicker pieces may, in fact, be some of our best works because they tend to carry the most life energy and emotion.
And anyway, despite its simplicity and quickness, this piece you've posted speaks volumes of its creator's technical prowess.
You don't need to include a little note with it that points out it was made quickly as an excuse. The nature of the piece is self evident and beautiful.
It's so inspiring to me that it is now my desktop background.
Thanks for posting this.
Heh. This image really carries what I was talking to you about. There's so much feeling in it. And that's something that tends to fade in paintings which have been worked on for countless hours.
As the laborious detail and precision goes up, the life spark tends to fade. And so there is good reason to find balance between technical excellence and speed of creation.
I have been finding in my own works that... while I feel this need to apologize for the ones I made quickly... they actually tend to be the ones people like most. I sort of want people to like the ones I labored on for countless hours better because I spent so much time on them, and they are better in a technical sense.
But in reality, appreciation of art is more emotional than technical. In the end, the life spark in a piece is more important than any other factor. As artists, we spend so much time practicing and honing our technical skills that we can easily lose sight of that truth.
I'd say the next challenge for you and me both is to get over the need to apologize for making something like this. We feel this need to make excuses for a piece we created quickly. We fear that our technical proficiencies will be unfairly judged by our least meticulous works. When the quicker pieces may, in fact, be some of our best works because they tend to carry the most life energy and emotion.
And anyway, despite its simplicity and quickness, this piece you've posted speaks volumes of its creator's technical prowess.
You don't need to include a little note with it that points out it was made quickly as an excuse. The nature of the piece is self evident and beautiful.
It's so inspiring to me that it is now my desktop background.
Thanks for posting this.
I've noticed actors struggle with a similar concept:
They know that the best acting appears natural, appears effortless...
and yet it's a real challenge to get up on stage and be that genuine. Their natural inclination is to try to get up there and "act" ;
the result of which comes across as phony. Like those bad Shakespearean thespians you see in comedies. That impresses nobody.
It's, like you've described, an example of trying to hide behind parlor tricks.
I attended a gallery show some years back that featured 30 silvertype photographic portraits of a wide range of people, each one eating a tomato.
The photographer had given 29 of the subjects instructions to eat the tomato as seductively as possible.
The 30th subject was simply instructed to eat the tomato, and nothing more.
A poll was taken at the exhibit, and by a large margin, the 30th photo was voted the most erotic.
And there. The description has been edited to give you proper credit.
They know that the best acting appears natural, appears effortless...
and yet it's a real challenge to get up on stage and be that genuine. Their natural inclination is to try to get up there and "act" ;
the result of which comes across as phony. Like those bad Shakespearean thespians you see in comedies. That impresses nobody.
It's, like you've described, an example of trying to hide behind parlor tricks.
I attended a gallery show some years back that featured 30 silvertype photographic portraits of a wide range of people, each one eating a tomato.
The photographer had given 29 of the subjects instructions to eat the tomato as seductively as possible.
The 30th subject was simply instructed to eat the tomato, and nothing more.
A poll was taken at the exhibit, and by a large margin, the 30th photo was voted the most erotic.
And there. The description has been edited to give you proper credit.
That is just pure awesomeness. I recently started doing speedpainting myself, used a couple of photos for reference. It's rather exciting!
It all depends what you want to achieve (or whatever your task/job may be), you can be slow and thorough, or you can be fast and descriptive. Just do whatever you're comfortable with or whatever it takes to meet requirements.
It all depends what you want to achieve (or whatever your task/job may be), you can be slow and thorough, or you can be fast and descriptive. Just do whatever you're comfortable with or whatever it takes to meet requirements.
FA+

Comments