yer.. as mentioned in my last journal I joined Formspring.
however, didn't like any of their standard wallpapers, so made this one..
yer I know.. I really should start trying to make some real art instead of thees photoshop things..
however, didn't like any of their standard wallpapers, so made this one..
yer I know.. I really should start trying to make some real art instead of thees photoshop things..
Category Wallpaper / Abstract
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 800 x 600px
File Size 361.3 kB
it is.. just put some side by side for this image..
see http://www.formspring.me/Zlug for it in action..
or this http://nazg.dk/files/repeat-pattern-zlug.jpg for just the repeatable peace.
and thanks a lot for the fav.
see http://www.formspring.me/Zlug for it in action..
or this http://nazg.dk/files/repeat-pattern-zlug.jpg for just the repeatable peace.
and thanks a lot for the fav.
as I mentioned in my previously post, the pattern is repeatable, not this particular image, which is put together with multiply pieces of the repeatable piece.
as a demonstration of this I'll like to draw attention to the two links I just posted, the first where it is used as background on my formspring profile, and the second where it is just the repeatable piece..
as a demonstration of this I'll like to draw attention to the two links I just posted, the first where it is used as background on my formspring profile, and the second where it is just the repeatable piece..
That's fair enough, not really a helpful way of saying it, though. In my opinion. Which is kinda irrelevant since it's his work, but eh.
I seriously don't see why you'd question my brightness because I question the necessity of putting just a tile up.
Really, you were saying you couldn't see that it could be repeated, even after he gave examples that showed it in on a larger scale - what I don't get is the "tone of text" you use to tell him that it would be more clear to see how it is a repeatable piece if he only puts the tile up. And then there's my personal opinion that it wouldn't really make it more clear.
I seriously don't see why you'd question my brightness because I question the necessity of putting just a tile up.
Really, you were saying you couldn't see that it could be repeated, even after he gave examples that showed it in on a larger scale - what I don't get is the "tone of text" you use to tell him that it would be more clear to see how it is a repeatable piece if he only puts the tile up. And then there's my personal opinion that it wouldn't really make it more clear.
FA+

Comments