Celsius vs. Fahrenheit
by TaniDaReal
Painting hybrid
16 years ago
A double sided digital picture I did for the Confuzzled 2010 conbook.
The convention's topic was "Mad Scientists", so they had several topic
related, illustrated stories in their conbook (which was a very nice idea). :)
I got "Celsius vs. Fahrenheit", the two characters were chosen to be
a Siamese cat (Mr. Anders Celsius) and a Labradoodle (Mr. Daniel
Gabriel Fahrenheit).
Done with Photoshop.
Text was given to me by Confuzzled. :)
The convention's topic was "Mad Scientists", so they had several topic
related, illustrated stories in their conbook (which was a very nice idea). :)
I got "Celsius vs. Fahrenheit", the two characters were chosen to be
a Siamese cat (Mr. Anders Celsius) and a Labradoodle (Mr. Daniel
Gabriel Fahrenheit).
Done with Photoshop.
Text was given to me by Confuzzled. :)
7562
Views
158
Comments
679
Favorites
General
Rating
Category
Sub-Category
Species
Resolution
File Size
Artwork (Digital)
General Furry Art
Dog (Other)
1233 x 884
158.9 kB
FA+

nonesense! absolute zero is how i role! X3
cause the "theory" is, everything will end, cause it will suck the energy from EVERYTHING...
cause its a point of infinate lack of energy
and besides, the system always keeps its zero-point energy, its impossible to extract every last bit of energy
(this also is a theory)
but once something with energy enters the system everything would start moving again. its not like everything that enters the system will stop moving as well because the total energy in the entire system is greater than one then. the energy cant just disappear^^
but it would make sense that time stops in a system at absolute zero... if everything stops you cant distinguish between certain moments anymore. like, at all. and once you put energy back into the system it would start moving again, relatively to its last condition. so "for the molecule" time stopped :P
about temps. close to absolute zero: they got VERY close to it already. like just a few degrees. superfluid helium is a good example for this^^ if you get helium barely above absolute zero it turns into a clear and very calm liquid that creeps out of any container as a very thin film until the container is empty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z6UJbwxBZI
I love it, great work!
Awesome work ^^. Love their expressions xD.
England for example has BOTH scales.
And personally ME.... i'm inflatin car tyres to 2.3 atmospheres. But inflating Bike to 30 psi. Because for bike's weight that's more handy scale. So..... we don't need pointless fights, guys.
I was totally confusing a friend in Belgium trying to explain to him that here in Québec, the ambient temperature is in C, the water temperature of a swimming pool is in F, sizes of people are in feet and inches while distances are in meters/kilometers, the weight of someone is in pound but the weight of meat at the grocery is in grams. Etc. :p It's the kind of things you need to be born in not to get confused. ;)
"Fahrenheit added a further fixed reference point: the temperature of an equilibrium mixture of ice and salt-saturated water, which he defined as the zero point of his scale. Unfortunately, the use of three reference points added ambiguity rather than precision--the value of a degree varies by over 8% depending on which two of his reference points you choose. "
http://www.straightdope.com/columns.....erature-scales
Converting between F and C is a fairly simple procedure, there are places in the conversion that are exact and even a place that both are equal (-40C = -40F).
You could argue that 100 F is more accurate because the C conversion gives a decimal that gets rounded.
But if I told you something was 99 C exactly you'd have to go into decimals F to get an approximation.
Freezing water is an exact conversion between C and F, so is boiling. 0 C = 32 F / 100 C = 212 F
Neither C nor F is inherently more accurate than the other.
Because if simply having more steps is more accurate, why even bother with larger units for measuring things. Why not just simply say we have to drive 52800 feet to the store, it would be more accurate than saying 5 miles, even though they are exactly the same.
0C = 32 F = Freezing. Same thing.
100C = 212 F = Boiling. Same thing.
*shrug*
10milez not 5
100 degrees in one place could be 92 only a hundred feet away due to any number of small annoying factors.
Me, I don't care which one they use. I grew up using F, so that's what I use. Likewise with measurement... Standard v/ Metric is just flat annoying. The US should give it up and simply switch to the global majority rather than trying to force the globe to continue using ours out of sheer pride.
Can I imagine Celsius is the labradoodle?
I have my own temperature scale, instead of 180D separation, we do it in terms of Radians (Pi) and we also have the Imaginary number (Complex Numbers in A+Bi format) to deal with negative numbers ;)
And quite relevant actually. I was shocked to hear the weather given in Farenheit on British TV the other day. One of the first times I've ever heard it on any non-American broadcast. Confused the hell out of me XD
Is "hotting up" grammatically correct here, or should it be "heating up"? Just wondering.
Anyways, nice picture. I really like the expressions. :3
But according to the picture I missinterpreted. :P
But I'm too lazy to switch so it stays 22°Canine. ;)
Awesome work!
..Now we need porn of these two double penetrating Kelvin. ;B
Mathematically Kelvin is MUCH easier to work with. If you double or half the temperature of something in Kelvin you get a sane result. But try to half (or double) the temperature of something @ 0C
Its just odd math wise when you use a measurement system where a negative value is considered a normal occurrence. It would be weird to have a shoe size system normalized to the average size of a human foot, and then have people have smaller feet wearing negative sizes. Or what if we normalized height to the average, could you imagine being 5'4" and instead referring to yourself as being -4" tall ? Heck what if we had the speedometer in our cars normalized to standard highway speeds and speed limits in the city set at -30mph.
Temperature is one of the few measurement systems in everyday use that doesn't start at 0, the Kelvin(or Rankin) system attempts to address this but well we've already got 2 different systems in place and we are used to them, I can only imagine what it would be like to suddenly start thinking of a normal day 21 C (70 F) as being 294 K (530 Rankin).
"Oh its gonna be another beautiful day honey, they think the high will be 530 today"
And it is a simple shift. A very simple shift. It's celsius' linearity projected back onto absolute zero instead of freezing. And on your note about negative temperatures...celsius actually hits negative before fahrenheit. ;P So if you're saying negative's an inefficient system, then you're saying celsius is more inefficient. And there's a linear conversion between C and F.
So the argument between the two is null. Just depends on what you use and is a personal preference in the end.
Efficiency and Accuracy aren't really part of the problem, as those are usually due to procedure or instrument limitations.
make enough of this "stuff" for practical use we will have got again a negative/positive measurement in physics!
LOL
But I'm biased. :P
I prefer the celsius scale shifted -273.15 degrees though. Kelvin for life, but I'm biased... ^^
Which reminds me, I need a new lab coat...
I wish we would settle on just one system, it'd be for the best, really.
I kid. Awesome pic :)
Physics is full of jokes))
This represented a noticeable void in modern culture.
Aber da hier nur °C und °F zur Verfügung stehen....Celsius FTW xD
I much prefer Celsisu. It makes so much more sense. 0 and 100 is easier to remember than 32 and 212.
Typical us swedish bastards =D
Celsius was devised in respect to water, Kelvin was devised in respect to absolute zero. Fahrenheit just seems the odd one out.