<<PREVIOUS | FIRST | NEXT PAGE >>
Read it from the beginning on Tapastic or WebToonsHunger rules the predator and fear drives the prey -- but change is coming.Oren's Forge updates once a week (sometimes twice) a week on Monday (and sometimes Wednesday).
WANT TO READ AHEAD 25+ PAGES PLUS HELP SUPPORT THE COMIC?
Please consider taking a look at my Patreon!
Having your support will ensure the comic runs without interruption until the conclusion and then on into the next comic project!
Can't join Patreon but would still like to help? Please consider sharing the comic with a friend!
TwitterWhen animals considered to be "prey" by the apex predators of the world begin to band together for safety, where does it leave those caught in between?
Namely, a pair of pine martens, carnivores and flesh-eaters themselves, but small enough to be considered food for the bears, wolves and gluttons of the forest and field. They're on a journey to seek sanctuary with the rabbits, squirrels and other prey that have gathered to Oren--but they don't know if welcome or condemnation will meet them.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 700 x 1069px
File Size 205.8 kB
Listed in Folders
Don't get me wrong, she's a good antagonist. But as far as villains go, she's a bit of a dumb bunny. She's shallow, predictable, and easy to manipulate. I have a fox OC who would enjoy making her run in circles before tearing out her throat. And most of his best friends are mice and rats.
No, not at all. Her actions, reactions, and next three moves are easy to read. She's not complex, nuanced, or particularly devious. If she wasn't using a spear, she's be a blunt instrument.
Rask is a nuanced, three-dimensional character. Hemlock barely has a second dimension. I was going to compare her to Umbridge, literarily, but that wouldn't be right because Umbridge, though one-dimensional and blunt, didn't have a back story to give her depth. Hemlock, at least, has a back story and some fleshed-out motivations, even if they don't really change who she is.
Rask is a nuanced, three-dimensional character. Hemlock barely has a second dimension. I was going to compare her to Umbridge, literarily, but that wouldn't be right because Umbridge, though one-dimensional and blunt, didn't have a back story to give her depth. Hemlock, at least, has a back story and some fleshed-out motivations, even if they don't really change who she is.
Yes, actually, that's exactly what that makes her. As a writer, a character's dimensionality refers to how fully fleshed out they are.
Dolores Umbridge, whom I used as an example before, from the Harry Potter series, is a one-dimensional character. She is evil in pink, with no greater characterization than to be a foil for every step of the hero's journey. She's simplistic, always predictable, and has no redeeming qualities to make her sympathetic or even likeable. We're meant to hate her and so we do. But she lacks all nuance and depth.
Hemlock is a step up. Her motivations are at least somewhat sympathetic. She killed her offspring rather than let them be toys for predators, and she abandonned her only living fellow prisoner to save her own skin. She has some depth, and we can understand her to a certain degree, but she's far from being a fully fledged character. Right now, she's a seething bag of hate and bile with a need to kill things she doesn't agree with. Others have told her to give Rask the benefit of the doubt, but she refuses, preferring to (and I'm taking a stab in the dark here) bide her time until she can kill him without getting in trouble. I suspect, rather, that she will attack him and end up killing someone else, blaming him anyway, and possibly be exiled, spiraling her mental state down a proverbial and possibly literal rabbit hole from which she won't recover. She can become more three dimensional, but right now she's just too simple, too easy to dissect, as it were.
And then we have three dimensional characters. They have detailed backstories, lots of character development, and story arcs that show them growing as people. We have none of those here because it's still far to early in the story for a proper arc to complete, much less to delve deeply into someone's background. We've seen Rask's, Oren's, and Hemlock's all start, but only time will tell which of them goes anywhere.
(NOTE: I was giving Rask the benefit of the doubt before when I said he was three dimensional. He certainly appears to be heading in that direction, and I look forward to reading more. I hope Hemlock fleshes out more, too.)
My comments are pure critique. It's the kind of thing I would like to see more of on my stories, but sadly no one actually critiques the written word anymore. I just get likes and faves. I suppose that's just as good, but it doesn't help me grow as a writer if I don't get feedback. That's why I provide it to the people who post their works here.
There's nothing negative in saying a character is shallow, or easy to read. Early in a story all characters are shallow because we're just getting to know them. It's up to the author whether they remain shallow.
Dolores Umbridge, whom I used as an example before, from the Harry Potter series, is a one-dimensional character. She is evil in pink, with no greater characterization than to be a foil for every step of the hero's journey. She's simplistic, always predictable, and has no redeeming qualities to make her sympathetic or even likeable. We're meant to hate her and so we do. But she lacks all nuance and depth.
Hemlock is a step up. Her motivations are at least somewhat sympathetic. She killed her offspring rather than let them be toys for predators, and she abandonned her only living fellow prisoner to save her own skin. She has some depth, and we can understand her to a certain degree, but she's far from being a fully fledged character. Right now, she's a seething bag of hate and bile with a need to kill things she doesn't agree with. Others have told her to give Rask the benefit of the doubt, but she refuses, preferring to (and I'm taking a stab in the dark here) bide her time until she can kill him without getting in trouble. I suspect, rather, that she will attack him and end up killing someone else, blaming him anyway, and possibly be exiled, spiraling her mental state down a proverbial and possibly literal rabbit hole from which she won't recover. She can become more three dimensional, but right now she's just too simple, too easy to dissect, as it were.
And then we have three dimensional characters. They have detailed backstories, lots of character development, and story arcs that show them growing as people. We have none of those here because it's still far to early in the story for a proper arc to complete, much less to delve deeply into someone's background. We've seen Rask's, Oren's, and Hemlock's all start, but only time will tell which of them goes anywhere.
(NOTE: I was giving Rask the benefit of the doubt before when I said he was three dimensional. He certainly appears to be heading in that direction, and I look forward to reading more. I hope Hemlock fleshes out more, too.)
My comments are pure critique. It's the kind of thing I would like to see more of on my stories, but sadly no one actually critiques the written word anymore. I just get likes and faves. I suppose that's just as good, but it doesn't help me grow as a writer if I don't get feedback. That's why I provide it to the people who post their works here.
There's nothing negative in saying a character is shallow, or easy to read. Early in a story all characters are shallow because we're just getting to know them. It's up to the author whether they remain shallow.
Yes! Use a predator to hunt more dangerous predators, that's a good niche Rask could fill while still getting to eat meat. I mean I'm sure he could use fish for a while, but I mean... he still has to eat when the river freezes over. Interested to see where this heads, though I have a feeling things are going to go bad. Who knows, maybe Rask will show his use enough to get Hemlocke to shhh a little bit. Begrudgingly.
1) If he's like real world pine martins he's not obligate. In fact there are very few species that are obligate carnivores, and the only mammals I know of are felines.
2) We don't know how being anthro affects their diets. It's entirely possible that all anthro species are omnivores of some degree with "prey" simply preferring plants. Sprig mentioned something like this back on page 111.
2) We don't know how being anthro affects their diets. It's entirely possible that all anthro species are omnivores of some degree with "prey" simply preferring plants. Sprig mentioned something like this back on page 111.
Well done there Egg. You nearly made Hemlock want to kill Rask again. You should know what a hair trigger she has. (pun there fully intended)
But as expected and thanks to Sprigg for bringing it in. Best way to clear who it was and finding the culprit withsomeone that is a hunter by heart. For once Rask doesn's get antsy when he smells blood but gets fully focused and he knows how to bide his time and wait for his prey to make an error. Hemlock is getting there, after all she is biding her time to dispose of the Marten.
But as expected and thanks to Sprigg for bringing it in. Best way to clear who it was and finding the culprit withsomeone that is a hunter by heart. For once Rask doesn's get antsy when he smells blood but gets fully focused and he knows how to bide his time and wait for his prey to make an error. Hemlock is getting there, after all she is biding her time to dispose of the Marten.
How the tables have turned. The prey becoming the hunters and asking a predator to help. Hopefully, this gives Rask the chance to work things out himself and dispel Hemlock's misgivings about him.
I love how this comic is progressing and how much thought goes into it.⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
I love how this comic is progressing and how much thought goes into it.⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
FA+

Comments