Oh? I am confused what you means.
But I think it is still amazing looking nwn

Odd, because it's legal, and discrimination isnt

Unfortunate censorship? Ohhh, right, the admins prolly freaked cause of the little lass

Yeah I figured that might happen.

yea You have to be careful with kids here

there was nothing sexual or porn on that page, I can bet it was just someone with empty complaints ^^¿

And an empty head~ Keep up the awesome work~

Thanks for saying it ^_^
HUGS
Always =)

Not a problem, sweetie~ *many softbunnyhugs for you~*

and sadly the empty complaint of this page was "Who wants to look up a little girl's skirt to see their panties?" ^^;;

There was nothing to see

I know but still people can be just as touchy as the people who run Youtube now

the little lass is still adorable and still love her shoes too

This is a fun, fast, delightfully humorous action story. Only horrible little trolls, desperate for SOMETHING to be offended by, would even try to twist it into CP. "This is why we can't have nice things".

Thats a big big true ^^

*checks the differences* I mean, you showed the little girl with a very clear camel toe, sooo... yeah.
I'm not sure what the social standards are in Argentina, but in the U.S. where FA is hosted and many of the admins are from, that's a pretty cut&dry no-no.

Still an amazing, fun comic~

Im sorry, but if you see that as porn, dont blame me ^^
clothin and anatomy is one thing, but seeing that beyond that is not my fault. and even more in something that is no real, a comedy, a fantasy. If we start making excuses to censorship, the spiral down will be devastating to freedom. We are already losing a lot of freedom of speech and think thanks to the new snowflake wave. In the end of the 70s and all the 80s and part of the 90s we reach an amazing freedom of thought, speech and mind without any king of hate or racism or discriination, everybody understood a joke, a story, the line that separated fantasy and reality was so clear and so free to explore. and now we are starting to lose everything we had just because some "ofended" trend.
Truly is really sad to see how everything is unevolving. we are heading clearly to Demolition man and Idiocracy, and I wish that could be just a joke =P

agreed! with ZorreRe.

It's not a matter of legality, it's a matter of FA's rules. The rules have been an issue for years and they seem to get more bizarre as time goes by. Part has to do with who owns FA now and how they process money.

The rule in question may still apply here since you can't show anything even remotely sexual, including bare exposure or provocative clothing in the same image as a minor. This page may have to come down.

Original will still be available elsewhere.

Well, yeah.

Yup, called it.
Like one guy point out, it's a mostly US issue (which the site is hosted on thus US site, US rules).

Even though nothing explicit / sexual was shown / done. It's a "taboo" enough thing to where if the wrong eyes see it the whole site ends up in hot water.
Even if the sites full of every fetish and adult theme you can thing of, the second a kid gets involved in anything that isn't "playing house in the playground in triple layered winter coats" things get.. hairy..

It isn't even a US law issue. It's a money issue.

Correct. For CP to be legally and criminally prosecutable in the US, it needs to depict sexual abuse/harm of an actual, real child, therefore, despite artistic depictions being a moral gray zone, drawings are not illegal.

That's far from an absolute. While the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was struck down by the Supreme court there are many states who have much more grey area laws such as obscenity which they will use to pursue a conviction. There are many many laws, many of which contradict each other, which the state has at it's disposal to pursue justice. Don't think that just because there isn't a direct law for drawn child pornography means an overzealous or upright morals prosecutor can't nail you for something with it.

I was referring specifically to the federal laws and definitions, as those tend to supercede state laws in this situation. While you're correct that many different charges could be levied against an individual who merely created said artwork, unless it was based on an "actual minor" and was a "digital or computer generated image indistinguishable from an actual minor and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor," it would not result in a conviction for CP.

Additionally, CP is defined as "any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor." Having seen the original image myself, it would be a rather difficult argument to say it meets that definition, as the law goes on to explain that sex doesn't actually need to be involved, but mere nudity in a sexually suggestive way could constitute that definition.

To be clear, I believe most, if not all of us, are against CP, myself included. I'm simply commenting on legal interpretations as a self-proclaimed, amateur lawyer. XD Also, regardless of legal issues, FA is free to impose their own rules.

Awww, i was hoping the reupload would be to save her delightful hat :( RIP Green Berret, you will be missed.

Yeah I saw this coming. These days, even when we know something like that is innocent, no one wants anything even remotely close to possible sexualization of a minor. Can't say I blame them. The world is just not innocent as it used to be.

I want to know we’re is a copy of the original post

https://www.sofurry.com/view/1569685

Thank you very much.

While I don't agree with the anti cub rules, I don't really think anyone should be surprised that this went down.

I mean, you drew a low angle upskirt heavily camel toe'd little girl. What did you think was gonna happen?

Have to agree with this. Don't push the rules and expect to get away with it.

if you are the ones who see something dirty there, don´t blame me ^^
What I think was gonna happen? easy. Rational and free ppl
Now I know the rules and don`t discuss that, and Ill aboid posting all you may think is...inapropiated.... but be carefull when you defend censorship. its really a thin thin line.
When we start listen more to complains we just enforce ppl who just talk, and don`t contribute with anything good.
So please, in a good way, don`t try to lecture me ^^

agreed!

No one here is defending censorship. I prefaced what I said by mentioning that I don't agree with the rules against cub work.

What I said was that this wasn't surprising and that you were, obviously, pushing the rules. That's not a defense to the rules. We're on the same team. Don't talk down to me about censorship.