This pic was concieved during the last blizzard here in NYC, during the aftermath of which I hung around a certain street corner watching the "2-meter slush jump". I've done this for years, but it's only the second time I've actually drawn something about it, this time noting the nonchalance with which many folks plow through such urban water hazards (because it's funnier when they don't expect it to be that deep :) ).
Okay, I'm specifically talking about the ladies, especially when they do it wearing any one of a large number of fashion boots that aren't really intended to be dunked in ankle-deep slop, yet seldom (if ever) register any indication that their feet are getting wet. Maybe they're already wet, or maybe the boots are made just well enough to let them get away with it a few times before leakage sets in (although, with many styles having full-length zippers that aren't leakproof by any stretch of the imagination, I don't really know).
Knowing that most of these fashion/dress boots aren't waterproof (as evidenced by more than a few customer reviews on sites that sell similar styles), how can I (and many other guys) maintain so easily the impression that they somehow are? Because such footwear doesn't exist for us. As such, we have no first-hand experience with high boots, much less ones that aren't waterproof, making it quite easy to ignore the notion that they aren't providing much protection to the ladies wading through large slush puddles with them. So they still look cool as they appear to be protecting the wearer from foot-swallowing-deep slop. So here are Cynthia, Tanya, Tatiana and Tina taking a stroll on the wet side, not really paying attention to the deep slush they're wading through, perhaps because it's not affecting their comfort. Are their feet getting wet? I leave that up to your imagination/fantasy.
Feel free to discuss. Even if you don't typically comment :)
Disclaimer: I'm aware of the proposed AUP update that theoretically disallows de-motivational posters. I believe this submission is (or should be) exempt since it is 100% composed of my own material. That is, the artwork is from my own hand, the photos from my own camera (taken specifically for this pic) and the composition/text were done in my usual graphics app, with no outside help save for reading a page at Ra226.net that describes the format of motivational/demotivational posters.
Technical:
--I don't know whether to call this a motivational or a demotivational poster. Honestly, it could be both.
--The longest-winded portion of the project was altering the slush-puddle photos so they actually looked like the characters were wading through them. In one case (Tatiana) I was able to make use of an existing footprint in the photo, the others were purely 'shooped.
--Ballpoint-inked pencils colored and composed in Micrografx Picture Publisher 8.
--Full uncompressed size: 120MB (4800x3000).
--Full-size bitmap with layers compressed: 41MB
--Individual art image total: 342MB
--Total project data size: 601MB
Okay, I'm specifically talking about the ladies, especially when they do it wearing any one of a large number of fashion boots that aren't really intended to be dunked in ankle-deep slop, yet seldom (if ever) register any indication that their feet are getting wet. Maybe they're already wet, or maybe the boots are made just well enough to let them get away with it a few times before leakage sets in (although, with many styles having full-length zippers that aren't leakproof by any stretch of the imagination, I don't really know).
Knowing that most of these fashion/dress boots aren't waterproof (as evidenced by more than a few customer reviews on sites that sell similar styles), how can I (and many other guys) maintain so easily the impression that they somehow are? Because such footwear doesn't exist for us. As such, we have no first-hand experience with high boots, much less ones that aren't waterproof, making it quite easy to ignore the notion that they aren't providing much protection to the ladies wading through large slush puddles with them. So they still look cool as they appear to be protecting the wearer from foot-swallowing-deep slop. So here are Cynthia, Tanya, Tatiana and Tina taking a stroll on the wet side, not really paying attention to the deep slush they're wading through, perhaps because it's not affecting their comfort. Are their feet getting wet? I leave that up to your imagination/fantasy.
Feel free to discuss. Even if you don't typically comment :)
Disclaimer: I'm aware of the proposed AUP update that theoretically disallows de-motivational posters. I believe this submission is (or should be) exempt since it is 100% composed of my own material. That is, the artwork is from my own hand, the photos from my own camera (taken specifically for this pic) and the composition/text were done in my usual graphics app, with no outside help save for reading a page at Ra226.net that describes the format of motivational/demotivational posters.
Technical:
--I don't know whether to call this a motivational or a demotivational poster. Honestly, it could be both.
--The longest-winded portion of the project was altering the slush-puddle photos so they actually looked like the characters were wading through them. In one case (Tatiana) I was able to make use of an existing footprint in the photo, the others were purely 'shooped.
--Ballpoint-inked pencils colored and composed in Micrografx Picture Publisher 8.
--Full uncompressed size: 120MB (4800x3000).
--Full-size bitmap with layers compressed: 41MB
--Individual art image total: 342MB
--Total project data size: 601MB
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Housecat
Size 1200 x 750px
File Size 141.8 kB
There's a bunch of common boot styles I wanted to draw the girls in--this is partly a means of getting some of them done.
But since the boots are partly hidden in order to convey how deep the slush is, I considered doing a series of "They Fought the Slush, and the Salt Won" pics showing them on dry ground, modeling their boots, showing the salt stains that resulted from their repeated encounters with the stuff :D
But since the boots are partly hidden in order to convey how deep the slush is, I considered doing a series of "They Fought the Slush, and the Salt Won" pics showing them on dry ground, modeling their boots, showing the salt stains that resulted from their repeated encounters with the stuff :D
Typical fashion boots? None that I've heard of. There are some that claim to be waterproof (La Canadienne is one brand that comes to mind), but most of those have full-length zippers, and I've never heard of any that were also equipped with gusseted closures.
Still, that doesn't seem to stop the ones I've observed from walking through ankle-deep slush with suede (!) or leather fashion boots. When I observed (for an hour or so) following the last snowstorm, I didn't see any of them register any discomfort as they picked their way through the slush. I did see one wearing sneakers get pulled through the puddle (the one Tatiana is seen walking through) as someone volunteered to help ferry her stroller across. Afterward, she stood waiting for traffic to clear, alternately holding up and shaking each foot, so I know her shoes flooded.
Still, that doesn't seem to stop the ones I've observed from walking through ankle-deep slush with suede (!) or leather fashion boots. When I observed (for an hour or so) following the last snowstorm, I didn't see any of them register any discomfort as they picked their way through the slush. I did see one wearing sneakers get pulled through the puddle (the one Tatiana is seen walking through) as someone volunteered to help ferry her stroller across. Afterward, she stood waiting for traffic to clear, alternately holding up and shaking each foot, so I know her shoes flooded.
unci doesn't see the point in impractical footwear - (so is either barepawed or in highly functional trekking boots with goretex and a good tread pattern; suitable for the most rugged terrains) .... it will forever remain a mystery why some people (stereotypically especially females) spend enormous amounts on shoes that are both uncomfortable and impractical and don't even look much better. (unci also doesn't deem high heels as attractive, they are wicked instruments of torture; a relaxed lady who is comfortable with herself and the world is much more attractive to hym!)
well, to be fair, the ones I observed that inspired this pic weren't wearing anything particularly expensive--maybe $20-40, going by the shops on the shopping district near where I work, and they were all 1" or less heels.
I glossed over the near-equal number of ladies wearing hiking boots or cheap rain boots (wellies), because they were less interesting to watch :)
I glossed over the near-equal number of ladies wearing hiking boots or cheap rain boots (wellies), because they were less interesting to watch :)
FA+

Comments