FA+
Shop
288
Views
Views
5
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Photography / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 870
File Size 568.7 kB
Report this content
More from xHaZxMaTx
Ain't she purdy? :>
This was also an exercise in merchandise photography. The background is simply a white foam science project board and the only lighting is from my ceiling fan and a standing lamp in the corner of my room. Set the camera up so it faced itself in a mirror, so I had to flip the image and 'Shop the lens, since the original image showed the aperture blades (shot at f/5.6) and the sensor (which is just black).
Edit:
Alright, reshot with a larger f/# and removed the strap, altogether.
This was also an exercise in merchandise photography. The background is simply a white foam science project board and the only lighting is from my ceiling fan and a standing lamp in the corner of my room. Set the camera up so it faced itself in a mirror, so I had to flip the image and 'Shop the lens, since the original image showed the aperture blades (shot at f/5.6) and the sensor (which is just black).
Edit:
Alright, reshot with a larger f/# and removed the strap, altogether.
Category Photography / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 870px
File Size 568.7 kB
Wow, really? Only the 1.8? That body at least deserves the 1.4. Why do you punish it so?
The shot could benefit from a larger depth of field. The EOS 7D logo and the buttons on the top of the camera are slightly blurry. Product photography, especially when it's close-up, needs working apertures of around f/11-f/16 to ensure everything is in crisp focus.
The shot could benefit from a larger depth of field. The EOS 7D logo and the buttons on the top of the camera are slightly blurry. Product photography, especially when it's close-up, needs working apertures of around f/11-f/16 to ensure everything is in crisp focus.
Go big or go home. Kill the bank and go 1.2!
Seriously though, I've been considering the 28mm f/1.8 due to the APS-C sensor size. It'd be more practical for this camera (which I also have a 7D). The 28mm f/1.8 may cost a little more than the 50mm f/1.4, but again, more practical as a portrait lens.
Seriously though, I've been considering the 28mm f/1.8 due to the APS-C sensor size. It'd be more practical for this camera (which I also have a 7D). The 28mm f/1.8 may cost a little more than the 50mm f/1.4, but again, more practical as a portrait lens.
Unfortunately, Canon's 28mm f/1.8 is a rather poor performer considering the cost of the lens. :( Very soft in the corners unless you stop waayyyy down. http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/show.....duct/83/cat/10
O: Oh jeez.
Hmm, at this time, absolute quality in my glass is not of the utmost concern. Getting the shot is first priority, which is why I've stuck with my 18-270mm f/3.5-5.6 Tamron. In time, I'll pick up some L glass like the 70-200 f/2.8 II IS USM, and some ultra-wide glass that's better than my Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6.
Hmm, at this time, absolute quality in my glass is not of the utmost concern. Getting the shot is first priority, which is why I've stuck with my 18-270mm f/3.5-5.6 Tamron. In time, I'll pick up some L glass like the 70-200 f/2.8 II IS USM, and some ultra-wide glass that's better than my Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6.
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/2987154/
You've seen this, but I'm representin' the 7D community here.
(I have a battery grip on mine too. I think I'll post and updated pic later) :3
You've seen this, but I'm representin' the 7D community here.
(I have a battery grip on mine too. I think I'll post and updated pic later) :3
Well, you might not have meant it, but its the general idea when the floor and backdrop are white... o.o
If you were to move one of your lights (I'm not sure how you have it setup) it would have made the effect work.
The surface the camera is sitting on is slightly off white than the backdrop.
If you were to move one of your lights (I'm not sure how you have it setup) it would have made the effect work.
The surface the camera is sitting on is slightly off white than the backdrop.
Comments