FA+
Shop
251
Views
Views
9
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 361 x 490
File Size 140.5 kB
Report this content
More from BigFuzzyWolf
Just a simple pink (does it look pink? The scanner doesn't seem to like it) mushroom. Part of a commission for 
.
Anyway, the sprite isn't the big focus here (unless you want it to be). I've included a ruler so people can finally stop bitching about the size of these sprites, even though I gave everyone the numbers to do it on their own. I made it easy for you all. Sorry if I sound old man harsh. It's just not hard to find out on your own, y'know?
That's a 6 inch ruler. This sprite is 16 beads wide and tall at the widest and tallest point. This should give you an idea of what you need to know.
Thanks guys.
.Anyway, the sprite isn't the big focus here (unless you want it to be). I've included a ruler so people can finally stop bitching about the size of these sprites, even though I gave everyone the numbers to do it on their own. I made it easy for you all. Sorry if I sound old man harsh. It's just not hard to find out on your own, y'know?
That's a 6 inch ruler. This sprite is 16 beads wide and tall at the widest and tallest point. This should give you an idea of what you need to know.
Thanks guys.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 361 x 490px
File Size 140.5 kB
I get asked quite often how big these sprites are. People can't seem to make the correlation between pixel and bead size..which is also why I get people giving me sprites that are way too big for me to do.
That's a 16 x 16 sprite, essentially. 16 pixels by 16 pixels. It's almost, if not more than, 3 inches in either dimension. 16 pixels isn't very big when viewed at normal size. It just takes a little thinking.
That's a 16 x 16 sprite, essentially. 16 pixels by 16 pixels. It's almost, if not more than, 3 inches in either dimension. 16 pixels isn't very big when viewed at normal size. It just takes a little thinking.
Sorry, sorry, I didn't mean for that to come off as sounding harsh, and I didn't mean to imply you were an idiot.
I've just received numerous requests and whatnot for stuff that I can't do because they're too large, and people don't seem to realize that, and wonder why I can't, even though I've stated in numerous places the max size I can do, how big the beads are, etc.
I've just received numerous requests and whatnot for stuff that I can't do because they're too large, and people don't seem to realize that, and wonder why I can't, even though I've stated in numerous places the max size I can do, how big the beads are, etc.
Heh. Sorry, I shouldn't have snapped at you. But I don't actually see anywhere where you say what's the max size you can do. It's not on your user page. It's not at the top of your journal. Am I expected to go read through all your journals and submissions to find this info? I don't see anything about how big the beads are there either, other than the link to this very item, which didn't exist yesterday.
Heh. Well, I never bothered to go there. Probably most of the people you're getting all annoyed by don't either. Every time you add a click between somebody an information, you're halving the number of people who will actually get to said information.
Still don't see anything about "bitching" though... just people asking questions you've already answered.
Still don't see anything about "bitching" though... just people asking questions you've already answered.
Comments