Not seeing any false statements here. It all checks out with me.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 1080px
File Size 259.5 kB
Listed in Folders
I see a fallacy of completion, among many other things. If you say a trans person is human and thus has human rights, then you must also agree that a pedophile is a human and thus has human rights, and that Hitler was a human and thus has human rights. (no, silly, read more, THEN comment...you're just having a conniption)
No offense intended, except perhaps of the fragile egos of people trying to escape society's bullying without trying to escape the society that is defined by bullying. But, the fact is gender is not a human definition, but a societal definition. The biological difference between a female human being and male human being are obvious and distinguishable and provide for two distinctly different roles for the species. The difference between a man and a woman however; is strictly a factor of the definitions of the roles of the two as provided for by society, not biology or nature. This is a huge difference that must be understood. Man and Woman are of society, male and female are natural and biological.
Because society defined and maintains the definition of those roles of man, traditionally the strong provider and of woman, the gentle carer; those definitions are tied to society, and any changes to those definitions MUST necessitate changes to society. So, by asking society to accept that you wish to change the role society defined for you because you were born biologically male and wish to be seen by society as a woman, you are asking society to change, and society WILL NOT CHANGE.
This is not a lecture, this is a lesson in reality. You cannot expect to be given rights when you are asking for society to change itself to suit you. If you do not like the role society has chosen for you, instead of trying to change society which is the only way you can possibly change your role, you should just leave society and define yourself.
Bear in mind that I say this with two facts in mind: one, I saw society had defined roles for man and woman, and that I did not fit the role of man, but I also saw I did not fit the role of woman. I saw that I fit the role of dog better, but strove to be wild, a wolf, so that I could define myself, which brings me to the second fact which must be kept in mind when reading my comment: I LEFT SOCIETY, and have defined myself as an alpha wolf, the father of a growing family of others who also do not wish to be defined by society. Stay there and fight for the "right" to have your self-defined role recognized and respected, or leave society and become whatever you want to be without limits or bounds. You DO have a choice.
No offense intended, except perhaps of the fragile egos of people trying to escape society's bullying without trying to escape the society that is defined by bullying. But, the fact is gender is not a human definition, but a societal definition. The biological difference between a female human being and male human being are obvious and distinguishable and provide for two distinctly different roles for the species. The difference between a man and a woman however; is strictly a factor of the definitions of the roles of the two as provided for by society, not biology or nature. This is a huge difference that must be understood. Man and Woman are of society, male and female are natural and biological.
Because society defined and maintains the definition of those roles of man, traditionally the strong provider and of woman, the gentle carer; those definitions are tied to society, and any changes to those definitions MUST necessitate changes to society. So, by asking society to accept that you wish to change the role society defined for you because you were born biologically male and wish to be seen by society as a woman, you are asking society to change, and society WILL NOT CHANGE.
This is not a lecture, this is a lesson in reality. You cannot expect to be given rights when you are asking for society to change itself to suit you. If you do not like the role society has chosen for you, instead of trying to change society which is the only way you can possibly change your role, you should just leave society and define yourself.
Bear in mind that I say this with two facts in mind: one, I saw society had defined roles for man and woman, and that I did not fit the role of man, but I also saw I did not fit the role of woman. I saw that I fit the role of dog better, but strove to be wild, a wolf, so that I could define myself, which brings me to the second fact which must be kept in mind when reading my comment: I LEFT SOCIETY, and have defined myself as an alpha wolf, the father of a growing family of others who also do not wish to be defined by society. Stay there and fight for the "right" to have your self-defined role recognized and respected, or leave society and become whatever you want to be without limits or bounds. You DO have a choice.
You did, by posting this publicly and inviting comment.
Don't be a fool. You can't just say something and expect people to accept it. That's why everyone hates Trump. Real people make their opinions known and justify them, instead of just writing something attached to a picture and assuming that since that's how those who rule you do thing that you should too.
Try actually reading what I wrote. Try actually thinking...if you can still think that is, if society hasn't trained that out of you yet, like it seems to with everyone else.
Rise above, or stay among the scum, you're choice.
Don't be a fool. You can't just say something and expect people to accept it. That's why everyone hates Trump. Real people make their opinions known and justify them, instead of just writing something attached to a picture and assuming that since that's how those who rule you do thing that you should too.
Try actually reading what I wrote. Try actually thinking...if you can still think that is, if society hasn't trained that out of you yet, like it seems to with everyone else.
Rise above, or stay among the scum, you're choice.
Wolves are intelligent, they respect those who are more intelligent as being better able to take care of them.
Why do you show such disregard and disrespect for someone more intelligent? Are you just letting someone else dictate life to you, living someone else's life, someone else's lie, for someone else's benefit? Because if you can show such disregard for someone who demonstrates enough care towards you to provide you with critical feedback, in an effort to help you see the truth - that transgender and other identity issues are part of a complex of propaganda designed to control you and turn you into something other than a natural, real live human being; then you have a very serious problem of not being mature enough to be able to conduct yourself. And if you are not mature enough to conduct yourself, you are just a child who doesn't realize he lives at home with his parents, and that this means his father is none other than Donald Trump.
Grow up child, become a man, and then, once you have grown up, then you can decide what you want to be.
Why do you show such disregard and disrespect for someone more intelligent? Are you just letting someone else dictate life to you, living someone else's life, someone else's lie, for someone else's benefit? Because if you can show such disregard for someone who demonstrates enough care towards you to provide you with critical feedback, in an effort to help you see the truth - that transgender and other identity issues are part of a complex of propaganda designed to control you and turn you into something other than a natural, real live human being; then you have a very serious problem of not being mature enough to be able to conduct yourself. And if you are not mature enough to conduct yourself, you are just a child who doesn't realize he lives at home with his parents, and that this means his father is none other than Donald Trump.
Grow up child, become a man, and then, once you have grown up, then you can decide what you want to be.
>rule 34 artists need to be investigated by the FBI
>dragons aren't furry and dragoneer sold out to the evil corporations
>pedophilia is bad but zoophilia is okay
I don't know whether to sink into deep depression or burst out in uncontrollable laughter
WHAT EVEN IS THIS PERSON
>dragons aren't furry and dragoneer sold out to the evil corporations
>pedophilia is bad but zoophilia is okay
I don't know whether to sink into deep depression or burst out in uncontrollable laughter
WHAT EVEN IS THIS PERSON
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂
I think it's more like you have to be stupid enough to understand "rick and morty" whatever the fuck that is.
You see, I'm actually intelligent. I think people in Mensa are idiots, okay? I wrote to Stephen Hawking often, at first offering theories, but then after realizing he wasn't as intelligent as I was led to believe, offering criticisms and finally just telling him how wrong he is and why.
Your comment suggests this has something to do with some element of your culture (your culture = media, television, games, etc. by the way). Anyone who posts something with the assumption that everyone else will understand that assumption is quite the fool, aren't they? This means that the person who makes such an assumption honestly believes that EVERYONE will share their perspective, that EVERYONE will know what they mean.
Sorry man, I don't work on assumption. I live by truth.
You see, I'm actually intelligent. I think people in Mensa are idiots, okay? I wrote to Stephen Hawking often, at first offering theories, but then after realizing he wasn't as intelligent as I was led to believe, offering criticisms and finally just telling him how wrong he is and why.
Your comment suggests this has something to do with some element of your culture (your culture = media, television, games, etc. by the way). Anyone who posts something with the assumption that everyone else will understand that assumption is quite the fool, aren't they? This means that the person who makes such an assumption honestly believes that EVERYONE will share their perspective, that EVERYONE will know what they mean.
Sorry man, I don't work on assumption. I live by truth.
I like how you IMMEDIATELY make the leap from "Hey people who harmlessly don't exactly fit into a series of social-norms driven categories have basic rights" to "People who fuck children and massacre Jews need to have rights too if you say that"
Lest it be forgotten, the rights of your fist end at the other person's face.
Lest it be forgotten, the rights of your fist end at the other person's face.
Is it fun being stupid?
You have no idea what logic is, or intelligent discourse is, do you? Did you go to school? Did you take literature in school? Do you not know anything about argument?
Okay, so we have established that you are ignorant. So, allow me to demonstrate to others, especially our ignorant OC here, how foolish your statement is: I made no leap of logic, YOU DID. This person posted something which stated "Trans rights are human rights" which by logic of construction (I should probably mention here that unlike you, I am actually truly intelligent and do have an understanding of logic and logical argument and thus understand concepts like fallacies, and yes, even literary concepts such as metaphor and hyperbole.) This is a statement mean to argue a truth that he believes. But saying that a person has rights in their defiance of biology and nature as well as society's very definitions, the society of which this person, and you, are a part, is a false statement because only humans have human rights. But what he said was that someone who is something besides human, in this case a self-described "trans-gendered person" is human and thus has the same rights. And what I said is that what he says is strictly from his perspective, and that someone else might also believe the same. Pedophiles would certainly believe they have human rights. And I'm sure Hitler would believe himself to have human rights also.
So, the logical conclusion which should be drawn by anyone with sufficient intelligent as to, say, participate in public discourse on a subject, is that anyone can say they have human rights, but it doesn't make it true. Trans rights are NOT human rights. They are what society gives them, and that is all.
Let me draw for everyone here a parallel that will shock and amaze you: Dragoneer got control of Furaffinity after he led a campaign to ALLOW cub art on the site, despite himself and everyone else signing up for the site and AGREEING that cub art was not appropriate for Furaffinity. Dragoneer fought for the "rights" of people to post cub art, only to reverse the policy, coincidentally after he sold what he never paid for and touted as non-profit, to a corporation, IMVU. Dragoneer fought for the "rights" of pedophiles. He believed that people who draw cub art have a human right to do so.
Bottom line, don't try to argue with an intelligent person when you are not intelligent. The only thing that will happen is that you will be seen in your true light relative to that intelligent person...at least by anyone who is themselves intelligent.
You have no idea what logic is, or intelligent discourse is, do you? Did you go to school? Did you take literature in school? Do you not know anything about argument?
Okay, so we have established that you are ignorant. So, allow me to demonstrate to others, especially our ignorant OC here, how foolish your statement is: I made no leap of logic, YOU DID. This person posted something which stated "Trans rights are human rights" which by logic of construction (I should probably mention here that unlike you, I am actually truly intelligent and do have an understanding of logic and logical argument and thus understand concepts like fallacies, and yes, even literary concepts such as metaphor and hyperbole.) This is a statement mean to argue a truth that he believes. But saying that a person has rights in their defiance of biology and nature as well as society's very definitions, the society of which this person, and you, are a part, is a false statement because only humans have human rights. But what he said was that someone who is something besides human, in this case a self-described "trans-gendered person" is human and thus has the same rights. And what I said is that what he says is strictly from his perspective, and that someone else might also believe the same. Pedophiles would certainly believe they have human rights. And I'm sure Hitler would believe himself to have human rights also.
So, the logical conclusion which should be drawn by anyone with sufficient intelligent as to, say, participate in public discourse on a subject, is that anyone can say they have human rights, but it doesn't make it true. Trans rights are NOT human rights. They are what society gives them, and that is all.
Let me draw for everyone here a parallel that will shock and amaze you: Dragoneer got control of Furaffinity after he led a campaign to ALLOW cub art on the site, despite himself and everyone else signing up for the site and AGREEING that cub art was not appropriate for Furaffinity. Dragoneer fought for the "rights" of people to post cub art, only to reverse the policy, coincidentally after he sold what he never paid for and touted as non-profit, to a corporation, IMVU. Dragoneer fought for the "rights" of pedophiles. He believed that people who draw cub art have a human right to do so.
Bottom line, don't try to argue with an intelligent person when you are not intelligent. The only thing that will happen is that you will be seen in your true light relative to that intelligent person...at least by anyone who is themselves intelligent.
Yes, yes it is.
Let me bask in the glory of your intellect, for you are the pinnacle of human reason, the epitome of logic, and the bastion of true argument.
Also, the discorse of argument really falls flat when you disallow the other side to offer any form of rebuttle, that only you may proclaimith your righteousness and virtuousity in supreme, unchallengable declaration and condemnation
Let me bask in the glory of your intellect, for you are the pinnacle of human reason, the epitome of logic, and the bastion of true argument.
Also, the discorse of argument really falls flat when you disallow the other side to offer any form of rebuttle, that only you may proclaimith your righteousness and virtuousity in supreme, unchallengable declaration and condemnation
I'm not trying to have a discussion, I'm trying to provide the means by which people can learn. I am providing an outside perspective.
And I am doing so because I hope that, like me, there are some people here who see beyond the fact that this site has been ruined by a pedophile dragon, and that this is about the best place to actually find furries...if you can sort past all the bullshit that is.
I just happen to have a Catepillar D9 to plow through the bullshit with.
And I am doing so because I hope that, like me, there are some people here who see beyond the fact that this site has been ruined by a pedophile dragon, and that this is about the best place to actually find furries...if you can sort past all the bullshit that is.
I just happen to have a Catepillar D9 to plow through the bullshit with.
As with most things in life, you have the choice to look at things. If you don't like something, you don't have to respond. Now, you may not like me for saying that, but that is the truth. Vorchitect didn't make you look at this. You chose to look at it. If you dislike it, then fine. However, understand that many people here do not agree with you, and are not obligated to humor your dissent. I will not tell you how to live your life, as it is not my business to tell you what to do. However, I do hope you realize that your argument matters not one bit in the end, and those you wish to "educate" are resistant to you because you are utterly abhorrent. I will afford you something that you have not earned or deserve, yet still need... advice. If you want to reach people, or even have an opinion you know is controversial and want to share it, the absolute worst thing you can do is try to equate pedophilia or Godwin's law to them. You may think it makes you sound brave, but it really doesn't. You are just coming off as an asshole. I don't know what made you want to go on this tirade, but I do suggest that you re-evaluate your life before you decide to try and accuse people of stupid stuff on a website dedicated to cartoon animals. This isn't 4chan, and you aren't impressing anyone. Take my advice, or don't. Not up to me.
Get over yourself trying to take on a role with me kiddo, it doesn't work.
Your "argument" has no merit for the simple fact that this was posted in a public forum which invited comment. I provided that comment. Now, you can apply your argument not to me, but to ANYONE who responded with their emotional conniption instead of thinking about what was said. I didn't ask anyone to comment, I was commenting myself. And as you can see by my page, I don't want to hear what anyone has to say.
Your "argument" has no merit for the simple fact that this was posted in a public forum which invited comment. I provided that comment. Now, you can apply your argument not to me, but to ANYONE who responded with their emotional conniption instead of thinking about what was said. I didn't ask anyone to comment, I was commenting myself. And as you can see by my page, I don't want to hear what anyone has to say.
Did you really compare trans to both pedophiles and Hitler? And yes. Those groups are still entitled to human rights until they violate the rights of others. That's kinda what human rights are. Something that we are ALL entitled to because we are all human. I mean... I only had to type it in and found this one immediately Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more.
Every other definition pretty much matches this.
Every other definition pretty much matches this.
Ah yes, of course it is a given.
But a lot of people don't seem to believe that. A lot of people are.discriminatory cunts. Those are the people this message is fighting against.
Trans people are human and will be treated as such and given all the same rights that every other human gets. Anyone who disagrees can eat shit.
But a lot of people don't seem to believe that. A lot of people are.discriminatory cunts. Those are the people this message is fighting against.
Trans people are human and will be treated as such and given all the same rights that every other human gets. Anyone who disagrees can eat shit.
It's one of the reasons I don't advocate violence against people like this. Sure he supports a lot of fascist ideas, but people like this are often too dumb/uninformed to know what they are getting themselves into.
It will continue to get better. Every year there's less of these people. The ones that won't change will eventually die of old age
It will continue to get better. Every year there's less of these people. The ones that won't change will eventually die of old age
I'M SORRY, THIS IS MY FIRST TIME WRITING AN ARGUMENT ON A WEBSITE.
In all honesty, ottercoj is just saying that the society we live in is obviously flawed. Of course, we still need SOME kind of society, just one that doesn't care about gender, race, religion, etc. Not because it's a stupid topic, but because it's not looked down upon. A society that doesn't need certain rights or laws for something because it's already a rule of thumb.
But, their analogy between trans people and pedophiles could've been better. The reason is that pedophiles are criminals, and thus go to jail or prison. Imprisonment is the restriction of rights. Said restriction is given because what the criminal did is inhumane or dangerous. Being trans is neither inhumane nor dangerous. Being a pedophile, however, is inhumane, if not dangerous.
Just sayin.
In all honesty, ottercoj is just saying that the society we live in is obviously flawed. Of course, we still need SOME kind of society, just one that doesn't care about gender, race, religion, etc. Not because it's a stupid topic, but because it's not looked down upon. A society that doesn't need certain rights or laws for something because it's already a rule of thumb.
But, their analogy between trans people and pedophiles could've been better. The reason is that pedophiles are criminals, and thus go to jail or prison. Imprisonment is the restriction of rights. Said restriction is given because what the criminal did is inhumane or dangerous. Being trans is neither inhumane nor dangerous. Being a pedophile, however, is inhumane, if not dangerous.
Just sayin.
I remember seeing a notification for a reply from a random person and going hoo boy I wonder what this is gonna be, is it my first hate comment. Then I clicked on the notification and saw how long the reply is and I burst out laughing. It just got better from there lmfao
FA+

Comments