Urgh... naked humans... (just kidding ). Where´s the uncensored?

Whiny nits complained about its un-furriness until it was taken down

lol I don´t understand some people... even if this place´s name is FURaffinity, there´s nothing wrong with posting human stuff... if people don´t like it, they shouldn´t look at it. Heh, I like it!

"if people don´t like it, they shouldn´t look at it."

But that would mean they wouldn't be able to bitch about other people's artwork!

Err...do you like people who bitch at other peoples pics??? I mean... if you like that people bitch about your artz... ok... but I don´t like people who ain´t able to give constructive critism to other peoples arts...

I was actually making fun of the people who bitch, lol

The sarcasm just doesn't entirely translate through text XD;;

Hahahah, sorry... I didn´t get it... even if I love sarcasm lol

In b4 whiney "this is not furry!!!"-comment

LOL

Does everything here have to be furry?

No, fur fags are just retarded and cry every time they see a beautiful woman(something foreign to them) instead of a dog dick.

ILU

And others like to point out when there is obvious camwhoring going on!

ie: The camwhoring above this comment.

How is this cam-whoring? This is photography and that is a form of artwork.

While portraying animal sex is totally fine, showing a naked breast is SOO lascivious and pornagraphic

I never said it was porn. I said camwhoring. ie: Showing yourself off in pictures in an attention getting way. ie: this picture!

PS: Taking photos of yourself in poses isnt really art that goes on FurAffinity. If you had drawn this pose, sure, then it could go up here. As it is, just camwhoring.

Well, I guess that's just your opinion. If someone else was doing this exact same pose, I would have put up here. Your insinuating I want attention, when really it's good photography, and if you've noticed, you're the only person who doesn't like it.

"Taking photos of yourself in poses isnt really art that goes on FurAffinity. If you had drawn this pose, sure, then it could go up here. As it is, just camwhoring."

And, yet... I don't see people bitching and moaning and pitching fits about the crappy webcam/shot-in-a-mirror photos other people take of themselves, which is actual camwhoring, as opposed to artistic photography (learn to tell the difference, please.)

Or the random snapshots of people's kids... or people's pets... Or wildlife photos... Or landscape, architecture, or car photos...

Oh well, I guess all of those are okay because they don't have the evil *gasp!* human boobies in them, right?

Actually, I do go point out that those are kinda dumb for FA as well. But if leaping to unconclusive conclusions are your strong point, that's cool too!

This one photo breaks about three things on the submission policy. I pointed it out and suddenly people want to say I dont like it cause it has boobs. Are you all lesbians defending eachother or something? Or just a band of camwhores together who think grainy almost vampire photos are cool?

once again :)