Reasons I need a ca- oh wait.
The picture is of an F4 Phantom's heat shielding behind the vernier articulation on the bottom of the fuselage. Thought it was neat.
[Totally relevant to a website dedicated to furry porn.)
>>Edit; Huh, neat... FA de-saturates the HELL out of pictures. Full colorization on my flikr; https://flic.kr/p/27wXwTH
The picture is of an F4 Phantom's heat shielding behind the vernier articulation on the bottom of the fuselage. Thought it was neat.
[Totally relevant to a website dedicated to furry porn.)
>>Edit; Huh, neat... FA de-saturates the HELL out of pictures. Full colorization on my flikr; https://flic.kr/p/27wXwTH
Category Photography / Miscellaneous
Species Avian (Other)
Size 1280 x 853px
File Size 389.6 kB
The GIMP says the Flickr version has an embedded color profile of "ProPhoto RGB", and offers to convert the image according to that profile, or not convert it. I tried it both ways and couldn't see any difference; the local image looks like the Flickr one, both ways.
However, if I run the Flickr version through 'jhead -purejpg', which strips everything that isn't absolutely required from the JPEG file, the image I get looks like the FA version.
I can also look at the Flickr version in an image viewer that knows about embedded color profiles (geeqie), and it looks the same locally as it does on Flickr. If I then tell the image viewer to ignore the embedded color profile, it then looks like the FA version.
So... if you want it to look right on FA, you probably need to get whatever software you use to save a version of the image after the color profile has been applied, rather than saving the image with the color profile "attached", if that makes sense.
However, if I run the Flickr version through 'jhead -purejpg', which strips everything that isn't absolutely required from the JPEG file, the image I get looks like the FA version.
I can also look at the Flickr version in an image viewer that knows about embedded color profiles (geeqie), and it looks the same locally as it does on Flickr. If I then tell the image viewer to ignore the embedded color profile, it then looks like the FA version.
So... if you want it to look right on FA, you probably need to get whatever software you use to save a version of the image after the color profile has been applied, rather than saving the image with the color profile "attached", if that makes sense.
FA+

Comments