"You see it all the time on furry websites, chat clients and Second Life. Perfectly sculpted bodies, thin-but-muscular or slim-yet-curvy builds, impossible body types. That NONE of us have in real life. If we do, we're in the vast minority.
So I challenge you, FA. Take a photo of yourself, fully clothed or in your skivvies. Trace your body type and marks exactly, blemishes, scars and all. Then apply your character to the form. Let's see what the REAL face of FA is."
I never realized how fucking weird my legs look. I am so lumpy.
YOU GET NO FEET >:C
So I challenge you, FA. Take a photo of yourself, fully clothed or in your skivvies. Trace your body type and marks exactly, blemishes, scars and all. Then apply your character to the form. Let's see what the REAL face of FA is."
I never realized how fucking weird my legs look. I am so lumpy.
YOU GET NO FEET >:C
Category Artwork (Digital) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 528 x 1035px
File Size 236.1 kB
Calories in, calories out, is the only thing you can really revert to here, even as an ectomorph (which as one myself, I can relate to how difficult it is to gain weight). If you know your height, weight, and age you can work out your base metabolic rate and how many calories per day you'd need to eat (consistently) to gain weight at a steady and healthy weight. (This can also be used to work out how many calories a person would need to take out of their diet to lose weight steadily and healthily)
For guys the equation for BMR is as follows:
(13.7 x weight) + (5.0 x height) - (6.76 x age) + 66 = BMR in Kcals
For girls the equation is:
(9.56 x weight) + (1.85 x height) - (4.68 x age) + 655 = BMR in Kcals
The final part for working out your daily calorific (such an awesome word) requirement is multiplying it by your physical activity level. This can be tricky as a lot of people either over or underestimate how much activity they do on a day to day basis.
For the sake of ease here (if you think you're higher or lower than this and/or give a damn, let me know and I'll list everything EVAR) lets assume that the activity level is moderate (Mostly sedentary, as in sitting or standing, but including about 2 hours a day activity in the form of gardening, heavy housework, brisk walking, exercise etc.). This would be 1.4.
So your BMR x Activity level of 1.4 = Daily calorific requirement.
FINALLY! To work out how to steadily gain or lose weight you need to times your Daily calorific requirement by 1.2 or 0.8 respectively. (a 20% reduction or increase in calories over what you need)
So for me, my daily calorific requirement is 2,500 kcals per day, to gain weight healthily I would need to be eating approx 3,000 calories a day. To lose weight healthily I would need to be eating approx 2,000.
This isn't an exact science, but it gives a very good idea of what an individual needs to eat to be losing or gaining at a rate that wouldn't be considered dangerous.
For guys the equation for BMR is as follows:
(13.7 x weight) + (5.0 x height) - (6.76 x age) + 66 = BMR in Kcals
For girls the equation is:
(9.56 x weight) + (1.85 x height) - (4.68 x age) + 655 = BMR in Kcals
The final part for working out your daily calorific (such an awesome word) requirement is multiplying it by your physical activity level. This can be tricky as a lot of people either over or underestimate how much activity they do on a day to day basis.
For the sake of ease here (if you think you're higher or lower than this and/or give a damn, let me know and I'll list everything EVAR) lets assume that the activity level is moderate (Mostly sedentary, as in sitting or standing, but including about 2 hours a day activity in the form of gardening, heavy housework, brisk walking, exercise etc.). This would be 1.4.
So your BMR x Activity level of 1.4 = Daily calorific requirement.
FINALLY! To work out how to steadily gain or lose weight you need to times your Daily calorific requirement by 1.2 or 0.8 respectively. (a 20% reduction or increase in calories over what you need)
So for me, my daily calorific requirement is 2,500 kcals per day, to gain weight healthily I would need to be eating approx 3,000 calories a day. To lose weight healthily I would need to be eating approx 2,000.
This isn't an exact science, but it gives a very good idea of what an individual needs to eat to be losing or gaining at a rate that wouldn't be considered dangerous.
What exactly are you doing in those 3 to 4 hours? Are the remaining 4-5 spent sitting down etc.? You also need to take into account your leisure time: how much of that is spent sedentary.
Moderate heavy is up at the 1.7 mark, heavy is 1.9 (but its really unlikely you are 1.9 unless you happen to be a builder by profession, and gym rat by choice, or something similar). I would be willing to wager that, provided you take part in outside-of-work exercise of some sort (sports, brisk walking, etc.) and the heart-rate raising stuff at work is genuinely fairly strenuous that you could put yourself at 1.5-1.6 if necessary. .
Also: yeah, make sure you do it by the right measurements. I only know one guy with a BMR quite so high and he's 6'10 and 110kg.
Moderate heavy is up at the 1.7 mark, heavy is 1.9 (but its really unlikely you are 1.9 unless you happen to be a builder by profession, and gym rat by choice, or something similar). I would be willing to wager that, provided you take part in outside-of-work exercise of some sort (sports, brisk walking, etc.) and the heart-rate raising stuff at work is genuinely fairly strenuous that you could put yourself at 1.5-1.6 if necessary. .
Also: yeah, make sure you do it by the right measurements. I only know one guy with a BMR quite so high and he's 6'10 and 110kg.
If you're using heavy equipment like pickaxes and sledgehammers for a good portion of your day, I'd be willing to put you up at 1.5 or 1.6. Better to be a bit conservative though. You wouldn't count as a 1.4 if you're spending several hours doing that daily, but if you're not doing anything outside of work then 1.7 is a bit too high to take it.
Go for 1.5.
Go for 1.5.
as much as i wish this thing was good, it just doesnt make sense
For guys the equation for BMR is as follows:
(13.7 x weight) + (5.0 x height) - (6.76 x age) + 66 = BMR in Kcals
(13.7 x 220) = 3014
+
(5.0 x 73") = 365
-
(6.76 x 20) =135.2
+ 66
= BMR in Kcals
3014 + 365 - 135.2 + 66 = 3309
that alone is far over what i take in a day and i havent factored in the activity yet, im not sure where id fall in, but my day consists of a lot of climbing, heavy lifting and at least 3 miles of walking a day if continuous would add up to about 4-5 hours a day at least. but lets use 1.4 anyways
3309 x 1.4 = 4632.6
i take in somewhere around half that, and i dont gain or lose weight
For guys the equation for BMR is as follows:
(13.7 x weight) + (5.0 x height) - (6.76 x age) + 66 = BMR in Kcals
(13.7 x 220) = 3014
+
(5.0 x 73") = 365
-
(6.76 x 20) =135.2
+ 66
= BMR in Kcals
3014 + 365 - 135.2 + 66 = 3309
that alone is far over what i take in a day and i havent factored in the activity yet, im not sure where id fall in, but my day consists of a lot of climbing, heavy lifting and at least 3 miles of walking a day if continuous would add up to about 4-5 hours a day at least. but lets use 1.4 anyways
3309 x 1.4 = 4632.6
i take in somewhere around half that, and i dont gain or lose weight
*Whips out "Are You Hot?" laser pointer.*
Let's see... umm... the, uh, legs... are... yeah. So technically, the midsection, which bisecs with the aft section and the other bisector gives you 5.8 degree on the...
... oh, fuck it. Summary judgement: Y'all lookin' good. With or without the feet.
... hell, without the feet, that just makes you more vulnerable and less likely to escape from my prying eyes. ;)
I tried this a few months ago. http://www.furaffinity.net/view/785866/ Meebe I need to update it. I HAVE been hitting the gym, for better or for worse.
Let's see... umm... the, uh, legs... are... yeah. So technically, the midsection, which bisecs with the aft section and the other bisector gives you 5.8 degree on the...
... oh, fuck it. Summary judgement: Y'all lookin' good. With or without the feet.
... hell, without the feet, that just makes you more vulnerable and less likely to escape from my prying eyes. ;)
I tried this a few months ago. http://www.furaffinity.net/view/785866/ Meebe I need to update it. I HAVE been hitting the gym, for better or for worse.
Well I did it and I left it a crappy color job because I didn't want to work on it any more.
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/273...../#cid:20129609
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/273...../#cid:20129609
FA+

Comments