FA+
Shop
537
Views
Views
5
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / Human
Species Mammal (Other)
Size 2808 x 1797
File Size 1.9 MB
Report this content
More from DNFTT2011
*Smile on face*
Category Artwork (Digital) / Human
Species Mammal (Other)
Size 2808 x 1797px
File Size 1.9 MB
Get a life and quit making yourself look like an idiot hiding in your echo chamber denying any facts anyone shows you and spewing your nonsense from sights and posts who's claims have been debunked on other news sights and articles. Also, try getting yourself some artistic skills yourself, kid. You're making yourself look bad for being a ignorant anti-Trump snowflake who can't accept the fact that Trump will win in 2020. Bye
Really?
1.Holding congress approved Funds/weapons to use against the Russian,for 55 days(77 Ukraine troops died during the 55 days.)Giving No one a reasonable excuse.Only to release the funds when the Whistleblower filed a report and Congress started investigating.
2.Asking,for a Foreign Government for a favor to investigate American Citizens/Political opponents,,which is impeachable.
3.Intimidating impeachment witnesses with possible assassination?
4.Removing good Diplomats,that are empowering good ties between the USA n Ukraine,our ally.
Tubby trump Is guilty of bribing a hurting Country for his persona gain.Not for USA diplomacy.
1.Holding congress approved Funds/weapons to use against the Russian,for 55 days(77 Ukraine troops died during the 55 days.)Giving No one a reasonable excuse.Only to release the funds when the Whistleblower filed a report and Congress started investigating.
2.Asking,for a Foreign Government for a favor to investigate American Citizens/Political opponents,,which is impeachable.
3.Intimidating impeachment witnesses with possible assassination?
4.Removing good Diplomats,that are empowering good ties between the USA n Ukraine,our ally.
Tubby trump Is guilty of bribing a hurting Country for his persona gain.Not for USA diplomacy.
Robert Mueller? You mean the very same guy that has a very tainted background? Check this out https://www.globalresearch.ca/13-sh.....ueller/5616426
The media is very one sided, look at the paper trail of who owns them and everything will start to make sense. If anything is to come out of this, be it that you'll do your own research, visit multiple sources on the same topic, and be an individual, be open to both sides, don't shut out one side base on what others tell you to think.
The media is very one sided, look at the paper trail of who owns them and everything will start to make sense. If anything is to come out of this, be it that you'll do your own research, visit multiple sources on the same topic, and be an individual, be open to both sides, don't shut out one side base on what others tell you to think.
*Reading the accusations on Agent Mueller* I don't anything worse than Obstructing Justice,Violating the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution,Conspiring with Others to Commit Crimes Against the United States, and Attempting to Conceal Those Violations,Advocating Violence and Undermining Equal Protection Under the Law,Abusing the Pardon Power,Engaging in Conduct that Grossly Endangers the Peace and Security of the United States,Directing Law Enforcement to Investigate and Prosecute Political Adversaries for Improper and Unjustifiable Purposes,Undermining the Freedom of the Press,Cruelly and Unconstitutionally Imprisoning Children and their Families.
These are bigger than that list of tin-foil hat conspiracies.
These are bigger than that list of tin-foil hat conspiracies.
This is where I asked for individualism and your own personal research, you pulling these subjects right from Hollywood that are meant to hide what they don't want us to see.
The number of Pardons Trump perform is minuscule compare to the number of Pardons performed by Obama. Look at both presidents, look at who they Pardon and why they done so.
Trumps total Pardons "11"
Obama total Pardons "1,927" with 330 of them being on his last full day in office, holds the record for most in a single day
Again look at each list, start with Trumps first it will be quick, Obama will take awhile, and look at who they Pardon and why they were in trouble in the first place, look at individual court records if needed.
How is Trump threating peace anymore than previous presidents? This country has only seen 21 total years of peace since birth (1776) and that because we constantly fighting in others wars. And he was the first leader to meet with North Korea to discuss peace and to move away from a deadly, only losers war.
And if you are referring to the time Trump kicked out Jim Acosta from the White house for being interrupting during the press conference , then you must remember that time when Obama did the very same in 2009 to that cnn female reporter? She got kicked out because Obama didn't like the question she asked.
And if you talking about the immigration problems with illegals, it has always been a problem since the Clinton been in the white house, Bush and Obama shared the same views as Trump during their terms. So why is it now a problem? Maybe it should had been fixed many years ago? And truly if legal citizens are busted doing something illegal and go to jail, their children are separated from them and they don't get to see them because they did something illegal, same with border crossing. Try crossing into Mexico or Canada illegal, you think our system is inhuman, test out either one theirs.
Compare and contrast, if the media is saying one thing, research it first, compare it to other presidents, and how is it different now, if it is.
The number of Pardons Trump perform is minuscule compare to the number of Pardons performed by Obama. Look at both presidents, look at who they Pardon and why they done so.
Trumps total Pardons "11"
Obama total Pardons "1,927" with 330 of them being on his last full day in office, holds the record for most in a single day
Again look at each list, start with Trumps first it will be quick, Obama will take awhile, and look at who they Pardon and why they were in trouble in the first place, look at individual court records if needed.
How is Trump threating peace anymore than previous presidents? This country has only seen 21 total years of peace since birth (1776) and that because we constantly fighting in others wars. And he was the first leader to meet with North Korea to discuss peace and to move away from a deadly, only losers war.
And if you are referring to the time Trump kicked out Jim Acosta from the White house for being interrupting during the press conference , then you must remember that time when Obama did the very same in 2009 to that cnn female reporter? She got kicked out because Obama didn't like the question she asked.
And if you talking about the immigration problems with illegals, it has always been a problem since the Clinton been in the white house, Bush and Obama shared the same views as Trump during their terms. So why is it now a problem? Maybe it should had been fixed many years ago? And truly if legal citizens are busted doing something illegal and go to jail, their children are separated from them and they don't get to see them because they did something illegal, same with border crossing. Try crossing into Mexico or Canada illegal, you think our system is inhuman, test out either one theirs.
Compare and contrast, if the media is saying one thing, research it first, compare it to other presidents, and how is it different now, if it is.
Here's my rebuttal to your 'detour' and theme of using the past to justify chaos and murder.
DONALD TRUMP'S
9 IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES
1
Obstructing Justice
After taking office, Trump asked FBI Director James Comey to abandon the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election—which the FBI had already connected to Michael Flynn.
When Comey refused to alter course, Trump fired him.
Trump then admitted the firing was over “the Russia thing” in a televised interview.
In a tweet months later, he stated that he “had to fire Michael Flynn because he lied to the FBI”— further affirming that he dismissed James Comey in an attempt to quash the FBI’s investigation.
Bottom line: Trump has repeatedly attempted to interfere in the Russia investigation, and admitted as much—that’s a clear case of obstructing justice.
2.Violating the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution
The Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits the president from accepting personal benefits from any foreign government or official.
Trump has retained his ownership interests in his family business while he is in office.
Thus, every time a foreign official stays at a Trump hotel, or a foreign government approves a new Trump Organization project, or grants a trademark, Trump is in violation of the Constitution.
For example: shortly after he was sworn into office, the Chinese government
gave preliminary approval to 38 trademarks of Trump’s name. Then, in June, China approved nine Donald Trump trademarks they had previously rejected.
And every time he goes to golf at a Trump property, he funnels taxpayer money into his family business—violating the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
Bottom line: Because Trump never divested from his business interests, he violates the Constitution every time the Trump Organization has business dealings with foreign or American government officials.
3.Conspiring with Others to Commit Crimes Against the United States, and Attempting to Conceal Those Violations
In the middle of the 2016 election, Trump’s son was invited to meet with a Russian national regarding “information that would incriminate Hillary and…would be very useful to” Donald Trump
The Russian, Natalia Veselnitskaya, had ties to high-ranking Kremlin officials.
Trump Jr. took the meeting. He said, “I love it,” when told Veselnitskaya may have had dirt on Clinton. Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner also attended.
Federal law prohibits campaigns from soliciting anything of value from a foreign national.
After journalists broke this story, Trump personally dictated a public statement on behalf of his son that lied about the intended purpose of the meeting.
This relationship between the Trump team and the Russian national raises questions of whether the campaign aided a hostile foreign power’s active operation against the United States.
Bottom line: Trump tried to cover up his campaign’s contacts with a Russian national—which, at very least, constituted a violation of federal law.
4.Advocating Violence and Undermining Equal Protection Under the Law
When Trump gave cover to the neo-Nazis who rioted in Charlottesville and murdered a protester, he violated his obligation to protect the citizenry against domestic violence.
When Trump encouraged police officers to rough up people they have under arrest, he violated his obligation to oversee faithful execution of the laws.
When Trump shared anti-Muslim content on Twitter, he violated his obligation to uphold equal protection of the laws.
This represents a pattern of disregard for some of the president’s basic responsibilities as defined by the Constitution.
Bottom line: Trump has demonstrated a pattern of behavior amounting to advocating violence, undercutting equal protection, and, as a result, failing basic Constitutional duties.
5.Abusing the Pardon Power
President Trump’s decision to pardon Joe Arpaio amounted to an abuse of the pardon power that revealed his indifference to individual rights and equal protections.
Joe Arpaio was convicted for contempt of court after ignoring a court order that he stop detaining and searching people based on the color of their skin, which constitutes a violation of their rights.
Pardoning this conviction goes against the Fifth Amendment, which allows the judiciary to issue and enforce injunctions against government officials who flout individual rights.
Bottom line: Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio violates the Fifth Amendment and harms the guarantee of Constitutional rights.
6.Engaging in Conduct that Grossly Endangers the Peace and Security of the United States
High-ranking administration officials involved in foreign affairs have signaled that Trump does not have the capacity to make informed decisions in the event of a military crisis.
Even worse, his actions could spark a needless confrontation stemming from misunderstanding or miscalculation.
We see this in full effect every time Trump tweets or makes a public statement taunting and threatening the North Korean regime.
The president may be the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,” but that does not give him the right to behave in reckless or wanton ways that put millions of lives at risk.
If he is unfit to perform his duties as Commander in Chief, he cannot be allowed to remain in the position.
Bottom line: Trump cannot be permitted to recklessly and needlessly endanger millions of Americans with his unstable behavior.
7.Directing Law Enforcement to Investigate and Prosecute Political Adversaries for Improper and Unjustifiable Purposes
President Trump has repeatedly pressured the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate and prosecute political adversaries like Hillary Clinton.
This is not based in concerns with national security, law enforcement, or any other function of his office—it is an attempted power play, plain and simple.
There’s no question that this constitutes an outrageous and inappropriate abuse of executive branch powers and serves as clear grounds for impeachment.
Bottom line: Trump’s threats against political opponents are threats against American democracy.
8.Undermining the Freedom of the Press
President Trump has repeatedly attacked the concept of an independent press.
He’s called critical coverage “fake news” and journalists “the enemy of the American people,” made threats to change libel laws and revoke licenses, and his battles with CNN led him to try to interfere in the AT&T/Time Warner merger.
This demonstrates his unwillingness to respect and uphold the Constitution, and disdain for the crucial foundations to our free society.
Bottom line: Trump’s threats against freedom of the press are also threats against American democracy.
(Thanks to Free Speech for People, whose white paper, ‘The Legal Case for a Congressional Investigation on Whether to Impeach President Donald J. Trump,’ served as the basis for this list.)
9.Cruelly and Unconstitutionally Imprisoning Children and their Families
Enforcing its new “zero tolerance” policy, the Trump administration separated as many as 3,000 immigrant children from their parents at the southern border. This policy was meant to deter families from attempting to cross the border.
The children and their families have been held in internment camps and cages with what lawyers call “inhumane conditions”
Due to negligence, the Trump administration has no plan to reunite all children with their families, even deporting some parents while their children remain detained.
Bottom line: Trump’s policy endangers thousands of immigrant children and families, and defies basic Constitutional values
(Thanks to Free Speech for People, ‘New ground for impeachment hearings: cruel and unconstitutional imprisonment of children and their families,’ served as content for this impeachable offense.)
Guess you did read this?
DONALD TRUMP'S
9 IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES
1
Obstructing Justice
After taking office, Trump asked FBI Director James Comey to abandon the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election—which the FBI had already connected to Michael Flynn.
When Comey refused to alter course, Trump fired him.
Trump then admitted the firing was over “the Russia thing” in a televised interview.
In a tweet months later, he stated that he “had to fire Michael Flynn because he lied to the FBI”— further affirming that he dismissed James Comey in an attempt to quash the FBI’s investigation.
Bottom line: Trump has repeatedly attempted to interfere in the Russia investigation, and admitted as much—that’s a clear case of obstructing justice.
2.Violating the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution
The Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits the president from accepting personal benefits from any foreign government or official.
Trump has retained his ownership interests in his family business while he is in office.
Thus, every time a foreign official stays at a Trump hotel, or a foreign government approves a new Trump Organization project, or grants a trademark, Trump is in violation of the Constitution.
For example: shortly after he was sworn into office, the Chinese government
gave preliminary approval to 38 trademarks of Trump’s name. Then, in June, China approved nine Donald Trump trademarks they had previously rejected.
And every time he goes to golf at a Trump property, he funnels taxpayer money into his family business—violating the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
Bottom line: Because Trump never divested from his business interests, he violates the Constitution every time the Trump Organization has business dealings with foreign or American government officials.
3.Conspiring with Others to Commit Crimes Against the United States, and Attempting to Conceal Those Violations
In the middle of the 2016 election, Trump’s son was invited to meet with a Russian national regarding “information that would incriminate Hillary and…would be very useful to” Donald Trump
The Russian, Natalia Veselnitskaya, had ties to high-ranking Kremlin officials.
Trump Jr. took the meeting. He said, “I love it,” when told Veselnitskaya may have had dirt on Clinton. Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner also attended.
Federal law prohibits campaigns from soliciting anything of value from a foreign national.
After journalists broke this story, Trump personally dictated a public statement on behalf of his son that lied about the intended purpose of the meeting.
This relationship between the Trump team and the Russian national raises questions of whether the campaign aided a hostile foreign power’s active operation against the United States.
Bottom line: Trump tried to cover up his campaign’s contacts with a Russian national—which, at very least, constituted a violation of federal law.
4.Advocating Violence and Undermining Equal Protection Under the Law
When Trump gave cover to the neo-Nazis who rioted in Charlottesville and murdered a protester, he violated his obligation to protect the citizenry against domestic violence.
When Trump encouraged police officers to rough up people they have under arrest, he violated his obligation to oversee faithful execution of the laws.
When Trump shared anti-Muslim content on Twitter, he violated his obligation to uphold equal protection of the laws.
This represents a pattern of disregard for some of the president’s basic responsibilities as defined by the Constitution.
Bottom line: Trump has demonstrated a pattern of behavior amounting to advocating violence, undercutting equal protection, and, as a result, failing basic Constitutional duties.
5.Abusing the Pardon Power
President Trump’s decision to pardon Joe Arpaio amounted to an abuse of the pardon power that revealed his indifference to individual rights and equal protections.
Joe Arpaio was convicted for contempt of court after ignoring a court order that he stop detaining and searching people based on the color of their skin, which constitutes a violation of their rights.
Pardoning this conviction goes against the Fifth Amendment, which allows the judiciary to issue and enforce injunctions against government officials who flout individual rights.
Bottom line: Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio violates the Fifth Amendment and harms the guarantee of Constitutional rights.
6.Engaging in Conduct that Grossly Endangers the Peace and Security of the United States
High-ranking administration officials involved in foreign affairs have signaled that Trump does not have the capacity to make informed decisions in the event of a military crisis.
Even worse, his actions could spark a needless confrontation stemming from misunderstanding or miscalculation.
We see this in full effect every time Trump tweets or makes a public statement taunting and threatening the North Korean regime.
The president may be the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,” but that does not give him the right to behave in reckless or wanton ways that put millions of lives at risk.
If he is unfit to perform his duties as Commander in Chief, he cannot be allowed to remain in the position.
Bottom line: Trump cannot be permitted to recklessly and needlessly endanger millions of Americans with his unstable behavior.
7.Directing Law Enforcement to Investigate and Prosecute Political Adversaries for Improper and Unjustifiable Purposes
President Trump has repeatedly pressured the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate and prosecute political adversaries like Hillary Clinton.
This is not based in concerns with national security, law enforcement, or any other function of his office—it is an attempted power play, plain and simple.
There’s no question that this constitutes an outrageous and inappropriate abuse of executive branch powers and serves as clear grounds for impeachment.
Bottom line: Trump’s threats against political opponents are threats against American democracy.
8.Undermining the Freedom of the Press
President Trump has repeatedly attacked the concept of an independent press.
He’s called critical coverage “fake news” and journalists “the enemy of the American people,” made threats to change libel laws and revoke licenses, and his battles with CNN led him to try to interfere in the AT&T/Time Warner merger.
This demonstrates his unwillingness to respect and uphold the Constitution, and disdain for the crucial foundations to our free society.
Bottom line: Trump’s threats against freedom of the press are also threats against American democracy.
(Thanks to Free Speech for People, whose white paper, ‘The Legal Case for a Congressional Investigation on Whether to Impeach President Donald J. Trump,’ served as the basis for this list.)
9.Cruelly and Unconstitutionally Imprisoning Children and their Families
Enforcing its new “zero tolerance” policy, the Trump administration separated as many as 3,000 immigrant children from their parents at the southern border. This policy was meant to deter families from attempting to cross the border.
The children and their families have been held in internment camps and cages with what lawyers call “inhumane conditions”
Due to negligence, the Trump administration has no plan to reunite all children with their families, even deporting some parents while their children remain detained.
Bottom line: Trump’s policy endangers thousands of immigrant children and families, and defies basic Constitutional values
(Thanks to Free Speech for People, ‘New ground for impeachment hearings: cruel and unconstitutional imprisonment of children and their families,’ served as content for this impeachable offense.)
Guess you did read this?
I got it from Democracy Now.
Democracy Now! produces a daily, global, independent news hour hosted by award-winning journalists Amy Goodman and Juan González. Their reporting includes breaking daily news headlines and in-depth interviews with people on the front lines of the world’s most pressing issues. On Democracy Now!, you’ll hear a diversity of voices speaking for themselves, providing a unique and sometimes provocative perspective on global events.
Democracy Now! produces a daily, global, independent news hour hosted by award-winning journalists Amy Goodman and Juan González. Their reporting includes breaking daily news headlines and in-depth interviews with people on the front lines of the world’s most pressing issues. On Democracy Now!, you’ll hear a diversity of voices speaking for themselves, providing a unique and sometimes provocative perspective on global events.
Water on stone, baby...
The current reactionary political milieu of our prez and his ilk is the death gasp of a dying dinosaur. There are more of us than there are of them. If we can survive this, we've got a decent chance of turning this ship around (To mangle a metaphor)...
The current reactionary political milieu of our prez and his ilk is the death gasp of a dying dinosaur. There are more of us than there are of them. If we can survive this, we've got a decent chance of turning this ship around (To mangle a metaphor)...
Comments