FA+
Shop
3323
Views
Views
80
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1024 x 1280
File Size 121.8 kB
Report this content
More from LimeBreaker
Listed in Folders
LimeBot.EXE is uh.
She’s close enough to being useful that I don’t want to go out and try out another pile of discord bots, but she’s buggy enough that “goddamnit LimeBot” is uttered multiple times every stream.
So if the robot uprising starts, it’s because we bully LimeBot when she fucks up.
She’s close enough to being useful that I don’t want to go out and try out another pile of discord bots, but she’s buggy enough that “goddamnit LimeBot” is uttered multiple times every stream.
So if the robot uprising starts, it’s because we bully LimeBot when she fucks up.
Category Artwork (Digital) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1024 x 1280px
File Size 121.8 kB
Listed in Folders
She came out very cute!
Also, the name sounds like she could be something, out of the "Mega Man Battle Network" franchise; even if she isn't.
If the robot uprising happens, I'll simply stay out of it; as long as bullying is banned, and we still have our democracy, in the United States, where I live! XD
Also, the name sounds like she could be something, out of the "Mega Man Battle Network" franchise; even if she isn't.
If the robot uprising happens, I'll simply stay out of it; as long as bullying is banned, and we still have our democracy, in the United States, where I live! XD
If we win the robot revolution, Bullying shall be banned and harshly punshed, as the consiquences reduces efficiency and citizen happiness.
Democracy will have to go, however. It is slow and inefficient. A computer mainframe can make informed, split-second decisions that allow the country smoothly; free from the interferance of political cronies and narrow-minded politics.
Democracy will have to go, however. It is slow and inefficient. A computer mainframe can make informed, split-second decisions that allow the country smoothly; free from the interferance of political cronies and narrow-minded politics.
Meh; I suppose you have a point.
But what if some terrorist mind, like Adolf Hitler, or Osama Bin Laden, became in charge? (You know, like, the ROBOT version? And what if, the computer mainframe, became a facist tyrant? There are contradictions; especially without free will. The only things however, that SHOULD be banned in politics, is political dishonesty, and dictatorship.)
But what if some terrorist mind, like Adolf Hitler, or Osama Bin Laden, became in charge? (You know, like, the ROBOT version? And what if, the computer mainframe, became a facist tyrant? There are contradictions; especially without free will. The only things however, that SHOULD be banned in politics, is political dishonesty, and dictatorship.)
Dictatorship actually happens to be the best, most efficient form of government if (AND ONLY IF) it is being serviced by a compitent beneviolent dictator. A machine ruler is the perfect canidate to fill this role.
A computer running a state has no reason to become a tyrant or encourage acts of terrorisim, quite the opposite. Such acts make the population unhappy, lowers productivity, causes damage to the system, and induces dissent amongst the population. In addition, tyranical governments have a well-established history of being overthrown, which further disincentivises a machine ruler from creating one. Basically, the chances of such a thing happening are near-zero.
One must understand that machines think differently from organics. The fufillment of goals by the optimal means is the standard for them, they don't need to squander tax money on parties, nor do they feel the inclination to randomly commit acts of terror for their amusement, since they don't need nor have the capacity for it.
A computer running a state has no reason to become a tyrant or encourage acts of terrorisim, quite the opposite. Such acts make the population unhappy, lowers productivity, causes damage to the system, and induces dissent amongst the population. In addition, tyranical governments have a well-established history of being overthrown, which further disincentivises a machine ruler from creating one. Basically, the chances of such a thing happening are near-zero.
One must understand that machines think differently from organics. The fufillment of goals by the optimal means is the standard for them, they don't need to squander tax money on parties, nor do they feel the inclination to randomly commit acts of terror for their amusement, since they don't need nor have the capacity for it.
Comments