F7 Cutlass: The Way It Should Have Been - 1
[EDIT: For more views of this model, please see my Scraps section; for an image of the Catlass in flight, see http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3053665/ .]
It all started about three decades ago, when I paid a visit to Travel Town in L.A.'s Griffith Park. One of the displays was an ancient fighter of swoopy aspect, reminding me of the futuristic artwork of Wally Wood. It wasn't until much later that I learned the relic was an F7U Cutlass, an interesting but ultimately doomed fighter craft (see John Moore's The Wrong Stuff, an entertaining look into aviation goofs in the 1950s).
While the Cutlass looked great from the engine inlets back, I never really liked its ungainly nose and high, spindly front landing gear, both necessitated by the high angle of attack required by its original design.
Mulling it over, I realized that the problem had been solved in later aircraft through the use of canards on the nose, and, since I had both a Cutlass kit and an F-14 Tomcat kit lurking about, I decided to throw together a quick and dirty "mule" to see just how well my concept would come out.
It exceeded my wildest expectations. With the addition of front canards (donated from a small scale F-86's tail), the resulting "Catlass" has got to be one of the prettiest planes I've ever seen. The F-14's nose and cockpit, amazingly, fit right in place with only minimal sanding... and this thing looks GREAT from all angles, as you're going to see.
This photo essay will also demonstrate the power of black and white imagery; I shot these pics with my digital camera, and they came out a sickly yellow. One quick run through GraphicConverter, and they're now crisp greyscale...
Modelwork and photography © me.
It all started about three decades ago, when I paid a visit to Travel Town in L.A.'s Griffith Park. One of the displays was an ancient fighter of swoopy aspect, reminding me of the futuristic artwork of Wally Wood. It wasn't until much later that I learned the relic was an F7U Cutlass, an interesting but ultimately doomed fighter craft (see John Moore's The Wrong Stuff, an entertaining look into aviation goofs in the 1950s).
While the Cutlass looked great from the engine inlets back, I never really liked its ungainly nose and high, spindly front landing gear, both necessitated by the high angle of attack required by its original design.
Mulling it over, I realized that the problem had been solved in later aircraft through the use of canards on the nose, and, since I had both a Cutlass kit and an F-14 Tomcat kit lurking about, I decided to throw together a quick and dirty "mule" to see just how well my concept would come out.
It exceeded my wildest expectations. With the addition of front canards (donated from a small scale F-86's tail), the resulting "Catlass" has got to be one of the prettiest planes I've ever seen. The F-14's nose and cockpit, amazingly, fit right in place with only minimal sanding... and this thing looks GREAT from all angles, as you're going to see.
This photo essay will also demonstrate the power of black and white imagery; I shot these pics with my digital camera, and they came out a sickly yellow. One quick run through GraphicConverter, and they're now crisp greyscale...
Modelwork and photography © me.
Category Photography / Miscellaneous
Species Avian (Other)
Size 1280 x 960px
File Size 587.5 kB
Listed in Folders
Don't forget that one of the biggest problems the Cutlass suffered was the fact it had been given two of those bloody Westinghouse 'toasters' (the joke at the time was: Westinghouses engines give just as much heat and have just as much power as their toasters) - and very thirsty ones as well. Not only was it underpowered, but the engines could drain the central transfer tanks so quickly that the engines would flame out on take-off - even with full wingtanks.
Oh, and the hydraulics were a bit iffy as well. As was the reserve manual control system, which in case of hydraulic control failure only kicked in after... 11 seconds. And the front gear strut was a bit weak-ish, and rather unluckily positioned underneath the ejection seat - which gave rather interesting results when there was a hard landing.
If the ejection seat would work at all, that is...
Oh, and the hydraulics were a bit iffy as well. As was the reserve manual control system, which in case of hydraulic control failure only kicked in after... 11 seconds. And the front gear strut was a bit weak-ish, and rather unluckily positioned underneath the ejection seat - which gave rather interesting results when there was a hard landing.
If the ejection seat would work at all, that is...
FA+

blacktailf-a
Comments