Ask Moth: Reply 22 -CLOSED-
Category Artwork (Digital) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 960 x 1280px
File Size 103.6 kB
Moth: *giggles wickedly* Oh, I don't think he will ever be persuaded. Of course, that was why I chose to make him an ass in the first place. I wanted him to feel as though he were being punished. But, because I'm in a good mood... *she flicks your nose and an eerie green light flashes* Consider your wish granted. You'll find that eating vegetables will get you what you want.
Occasionally, I like to find interesting ways to mix spell effects to produce unpredictable effects. I'd have to dig up my notes to remember some of the more interesting ones I came up with, once upon a time.
Now, I mostly toy around with spells aimed at testing the boundaries of distinction between human and animal. Like Dr. Moreau, I'm looking to find where the actual distinction between human and animal is, both mentally and physically. How much can you take from a human before they're not human any more? Of course, being limited to the realm of theory, I have no idea if my formulas are even going in the right direction. It's only the wide birth of theoretical speculation that's kept it holding my interest for so long.
Now, I mostly toy around with spells aimed at testing the boundaries of distinction between human and animal. Like Dr. Moreau, I'm looking to find where the actual distinction between human and animal is, both mentally and physically. How much can you take from a human before they're not human any more? Of course, being limited to the realm of theory, I have no idea if my formulas are even going in the right direction. It's only the wide birth of theoretical speculation that's kept it holding my interest for so long.
Moth: *crosses her arms pensively* Now that is an interesting concept. I haven't had any trouble mixing the traits of human and animal, but I have not put much thought to finding the boundary between the two. Tell me, have you found anything of interest in your tinkering?
The most amazing thing is that it isn't just purely in the mind or in the body. Some discoveries made have been that if a human is physically transformed fully into an animal, even if the mind is left intact, then over time, the animal nature eventually takes over the human mind. And if an animal is transformed fully into a human, eventually it will come to develop into human thought and behavior, although it will have admittedly limited intelligence due to lack of education and experience.
Conversely, if you totally alter a person's mind so that they think and behave exactly as an animal (in so far as the human body allows), the human mind eventually reasserts itself. It's suspected that the human body being incapable of performing many of the basic modes of movement of the animal they think they are creates a cognitive dissonance that eventually causes the human side to remember itself and come forward. This is borne out by the fact that the more differences there are between the human body and the animal mind thrust onto it, the faster the human mind reasserts itself (IE, a human made to think it's an ape will take a long time to return to normal than a human made to think it's a bird).
It therefore raises an interesting question about where the distinction is. What's the tipping point where a person has changed enough that a person loses humanity? Or the point where an animal gains it? And is the tipping point universal for all animal forms? For example, can a human become more ape without losing himself than he can become bird?
Interesting questions. But for reasons of ethics, they are not ones I could openly experiment with, even if I could master the practical applications of magical energies.
Conversely, if you totally alter a person's mind so that they think and behave exactly as an animal (in so far as the human body allows), the human mind eventually reasserts itself. It's suspected that the human body being incapable of performing many of the basic modes of movement of the animal they think they are creates a cognitive dissonance that eventually causes the human side to remember itself and come forward. This is borne out by the fact that the more differences there are between the human body and the animal mind thrust onto it, the faster the human mind reasserts itself (IE, a human made to think it's an ape will take a long time to return to normal than a human made to think it's a bird).
It therefore raises an interesting question about where the distinction is. What's the tipping point where a person has changed enough that a person loses humanity? Or the point where an animal gains it? And is the tipping point universal for all animal forms? For example, can a human become more ape without losing himself than he can become bird?
Interesting questions. But for reasons of ethics, they are not ones I could openly experiment with, even if I could master the practical applications of magical energies.
FA+

PaulShep
Comments