For textless panels you can find them at the patreon post!
https://www.patreon.com/posts/7940581
If you like my artwork please consider supporting me at patreon! Your support is what keeps me creating! Thanks! ^^
http://www.patreon.com/lumineko
https://www.patreon.com/posts/7940581
If you like my artwork please consider supporting me at patreon! Your support is what keeps me creating! Thanks! ^^
http://www.patreon.com/lumineko
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 434 x 1280px
File Size 165.7 kB
Virgin killer sweater sounds like a name that a retarded person came up with.
Therefore it's retarded.
Your perception of how English is supposed to work isn't going to change how English works.
If you think something is going to change just because you think it should change, then you're also retarded. (and possibly a feminist)
Therefore it's retarded.
Your perception of how English is supposed to work isn't going to change how English works.
If you think something is going to change just because you think it should change, then you're also retarded. (and possibly a feminist)
I don't really draw much of anything. If you clicked on many of the pictures in my gallery you might know that. If you're going to hinge on #2 breaking me you should do some introspection. You write lewd fiction about cartoon horses, while attempting to draw said horses. So if anything #2 applies more to you than It does to me.
The name virgin killer is a joke yes. It's laughably bad. "Backless Sweater" and "Boob Window Sweater" are much more apt descriptors.
Why don't you try to make a more compelling argument at the minimum.
At the very minimum at least try using a more modern euphemism. Pot calling the kettle black doesn't even apply in this day and age. Especially when two out of your three points apply to yourself more than they do to me.
1) There are better adjectives that could be used to describe said sweater.
2) You draw bad pony porn. You don't have any right to be pointing fingers at other peoples hobbies or original characters.
3) Words are used to describe things that happen. A sweater isn't going to be killing virgins unless you strangle them with it. When a website dies for a few hours, the words that I used to describe what happened accurately depicted the situation in a realistic faction, Albeit in a facetious manner.
If you're calling someone annoying because they use a word in a manner you don't like in a way you don't like it to be use, suck it up. Don't be a tool about it. I'm not bandying about racial slurs, I'm describing a situation. People perceive being retarded as being unable to understand basic concepts(such as yourself) due to mental inhibition(typically from birth). Therefore the word retarded can be used as an apt descriptor to describe someone who is actually mentally retarded from birth(He's retarded), or used to describe someone that acts in a situation in a manner which conceals any intelligence they might have given the circumstance. (You continuing this argument is retarded. You aren't going to change any minds because the definition of retarded includes both an informal offensive version and a version to describe people with a mental disability. My stance is supported by the dictionary. Yours is supported by belief and circumstance.)
Just give it a rest.
The name virgin killer is a joke yes. It's laughably bad. "Backless Sweater" and "Boob Window Sweater" are much more apt descriptors.
Why don't you try to make a more compelling argument at the minimum.
At the very minimum at least try using a more modern euphemism. Pot calling the kettle black doesn't even apply in this day and age. Especially when two out of your three points apply to yourself more than they do to me.
1) There are better adjectives that could be used to describe said sweater.
2) You draw bad pony porn. You don't have any right to be pointing fingers at other peoples hobbies or original characters.
3) Words are used to describe things that happen. A sweater isn't going to be killing virgins unless you strangle them with it. When a website dies for a few hours, the words that I used to describe what happened accurately depicted the situation in a realistic faction, Albeit in a facetious manner.
If you're calling someone annoying because they use a word in a manner you don't like in a way you don't like it to be use, suck it up. Don't be a tool about it. I'm not bandying about racial slurs, I'm describing a situation. People perceive being retarded as being unable to understand basic concepts(such as yourself) due to mental inhibition(typically from birth). Therefore the word retarded can be used as an apt descriptor to describe someone who is actually mentally retarded from birth(He's retarded), or used to describe someone that acts in a situation in a manner which conceals any intelligence they might have given the circumstance. (You continuing this argument is retarded. You aren't going to change any minds because the definition of retarded includes both an informal offensive version and a version to describe people with a mental disability. My stance is supported by the dictionary. Yours is supported by belief and circumstance.)
Just give it a rest.
If you have a mental deficiency the last thing you're going to realize is that someone is attempting to demean you because you have a mental deficiency that reduces your deductive reasoning.
People who are mentally retarded or people who are handicapped don't need and probably don't want your sympathy nor your virtue signaling. They want to be treated the same as everyone else. As equals. They probably want you to rib on them when they do something stupid just like you would with your perfectly non-retarded friends. They likely want you to treat them like you would treat someone who wasn't handicapped. The most insulting thing you can do to a person with a handicap, mental or otherwise is pity them.
Do you think that a handicapped person feels better when you look at them as if they were less of a person or give them preferential treatment because they lost the ability to walk or reason? No. It points at their disability and reminds them of what they lost.
Don't sugar coat your words. Grow thicker skin. It will make you a stronger person in the long run.
People who are mentally retarded or people who are handicapped don't need and probably don't want your sympathy nor your virtue signaling. They want to be treated the same as everyone else. As equals. They probably want you to rib on them when they do something stupid just like you would with your perfectly non-retarded friends. They likely want you to treat them like you would treat someone who wasn't handicapped. The most insulting thing you can do to a person with a handicap, mental or otherwise is pity them.
Do you think that a handicapped person feels better when you look at them as if they were less of a person or give them preferential treatment because they lost the ability to walk or reason? No. It points at their disability and reminds them of what they lost.
Don't sugar coat your words. Grow thicker skin. It will make you a stronger person in the long run.
FA+

Comments