Mad Scientist Dorey
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Extensive research outputs have confirmed that Dorey has held a Ph.D. for over four years; however, to date no project has been undertaken to depict Dorey as a mad scientist. The author feels that this represents an inexcusable lack on the part of the scientific and artistic communities that must be corrected. The objective of this research was, therefore, to address this oversight and advance the current knowledge base with regard to what Dorey would look like as a) a scientist, and b) a suitably mad one.
METHODS: Digital art analysis was conducted using GIMP 2.6.12 software and a Wacom Intuos Pen digital tablet. Due to feasibility limitations only a single replication could be made, however the author believes that the work presents an accurate and representative sampling of Doreys under the influence of science.
RESULTS: Findings concurred with the author's expectations in determining the presence of unnecessarily shiny and large stompy boots, long gloves, and a confusing array of glowy light sources. Additionally, the volume and relative madness level of the subject's floof exhibited a strong positive correlation (r^2 = 0.98) with the amount of science being conducted.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The original research presented here takes place at the frontier of current knowledge regarding the appearance of Doreys conducting mad science. Whereas most results were in agreement with expectations, this work presents a strong foundation for confirming accepted assumptions and proving them empirically. The statistical power of the results is limited by the methods that were available; past research employing the same analysis approach has consistently reported sketchy line art, vague backgrounds and inconsistent realism of glow effects, owing to researcher reluctance to learn fancy drawing tools and filters and insisting upon just doing stuff by hand "because it's just what I know, darn it" (Eirok 2010; Eirok 2014; Eirok 2016). Further research is called for to confirm the findings of this work and determine if alternate approaches produce matching results. Nevertheless, the author considers this research to be an unparalleled success and an important contribution to the field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Uploaded with Furry Crossposter ( http://double-helix.industries/applications/furrycrossposter/ ).
INTRODUCTION: Extensive research outputs have confirmed that Dorey has held a Ph.D. for over four years; however, to date no project has been undertaken to depict Dorey as a mad scientist. The author feels that this represents an inexcusable lack on the part of the scientific and artistic communities that must be corrected. The objective of this research was, therefore, to address this oversight and advance the current knowledge base with regard to what Dorey would look like as a) a scientist, and b) a suitably mad one.
METHODS: Digital art analysis was conducted using GIMP 2.6.12 software and a Wacom Intuos Pen digital tablet. Due to feasibility limitations only a single replication could be made, however the author believes that the work presents an accurate and representative sampling of Doreys under the influence of science.
RESULTS: Findings concurred with the author's expectations in determining the presence of unnecessarily shiny and large stompy boots, long gloves, and a confusing array of glowy light sources. Additionally, the volume and relative madness level of the subject's floof exhibited a strong positive correlation (r^2 = 0.98) with the amount of science being conducted.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The original research presented here takes place at the frontier of current knowledge regarding the appearance of Doreys conducting mad science. Whereas most results were in agreement with expectations, this work presents a strong foundation for confirming accepted assumptions and proving them empirically. The statistical power of the results is limited by the methods that were available; past research employing the same analysis approach has consistently reported sketchy line art, vague backgrounds and inconsistent realism of glow effects, owing to researcher reluctance to learn fancy drawing tools and filters and insisting upon just doing stuff by hand "because it's just what I know, darn it" (Eirok 2010; Eirok 2014; Eirok 2016). Further research is called for to confirm the findings of this work and determine if alternate approaches produce matching results. Nevertheless, the author considers this research to be an unparalleled success and an important contribution to the field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Uploaded with Furry Crossposter ( http://double-helix.industries/applications/furrycrossposter/ ).
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Western Dragon
Size 1137 x 1280px
File Size 2.01 MB
ANALYSIS: Initial uptake on this imagery has been confirmed to produce feelings of glee, uncontrolled grins and random proclamations of "Science!" that may or may not continue throughout the day.
CONCERNS: Use of out-dated and clunky GIMP software may actually be limited the overall quality from the lack of precision brushes, additional drawing controls and features found in newer versions (http://www.gimp.org/downloads/). Also, so well-protected footpaws will, at some point, require care and maintenance at the end of whatever science has been conducted for the day. Perhaps wise to seek volunteers?
CONCERNS: Use of out-dated and clunky GIMP software may actually be limited the overall quality from the lack of precision brushes, additional drawing controls and features found in newer versions (http://www.gimp.org/downloads/). Also, so well-protected footpaws will, at some point, require care and maintenance at the end of whatever science has been conducted for the day. Perhaps wise to seek volunteers?
*giggles!* Yeah that's true, I should really investigate newer versions. Most of it is just user obsession with the familiar though, I fully admit that! When I actually get in the mood to draw, the last thing I want to do is waste a bunch of time learning new software generally. And I think when I first got started on this version of GIMP, it wasn't the newest at the time, because I tried the then current one and it was doing some different stuff with features and functionality and I couldn't figure out how to get it to behave the way I wanted or... something. I dunno! But yes, I should revisit the current version and see how I get on with it.
Great thinking on the volunteers though. Engagement with the general public and citizen science is very big right now. Funding organisations love that stuff!
Great thinking on the volunteers though. Engagement with the general public and citizen science is very big right now. Funding organisations love that stuff!
Heh - I've been using GIMP since it was first invented - 2.6 was a long used version, but trust me, 2.8 is much nicer. Being able to use the single-window mode as well as a number of enhancements for the tools made the learning curve (which wasn't all that bad) worth it. :)
Also, I would like to be the first to sign the Dorey volunteer list.
Also, I would like to be the first to sign the Dorey volunteer list.
Sadly my machine runs Windows 7 due to a variety of personal and work-related software demands. Zel is a big Linux fan so yes, I'm already well aware of the myriad ways in which Linux is a far better system in many ways. ;) I'm sure there are ways to bring many of the same tools into the Windows version, though no doubt much less elegant and straightforward... I'll see what I can find though!
I did some digging and found some. In Linux (if you use some of the debian-based ones) the repos just combine tons of the best plugins from the GIMP plugin registry into one, but looks like for Windows, you gotta go and get them all manually. One of the best for working with photos and making adjustments that I like is the FX Foundry one: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gimpfx-foundry/
This is a list of what's included in the Linux one (so... I suppose you can pick and choose and add to Windows): https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applica.....ugin-registry/
This is a list of what's included in the Linux one (so... I suppose you can pick and choose and add to Windows): https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applica.....ugin-registry/
Very cool... on both counts! I'll have to do some investigating, but looks like a lot of great resource here. :) Man I love open source communities for that, it's just insane how much fantastic stuff is out there when you actually allow your user base and enthusiasts to help improve a product.
*growls from upstairs* Dorey! DOREY! Are you playing with my plasma ball again?! And where did you get those --- wait, is that my lab coat? Take it off! Take that off RIGHT NOW!!!
*grins widely and hugs the Doreydear* D'aww. That's quite unbelievably cute, dearie. <3 You look almost like a real mad scientist there! But the goggles hide the crazy gleam in the eyes, so I can't *quite* give it to you... :-D
*nuzzle*
*grins widely and hugs the Doreydear* D'aww. That's quite unbelievably cute, dearie. <3 You look almost like a real mad scientist there! But the goggles hide the crazy gleam in the eyes, so I can't *quite* give it to you... :-D
*nuzzle*
*giggles* Hey, I have a PhD too you know! I don't need to go stealing other dragons' lab coats. XD *hugs tight!* I'm very glad you like! It just baffled me when I realised I hadn't done the obvious 'Dorey as a mad scientist' drawing yet, and this needed to be fixed. Fair point about the goggles though. ;D
FA+

Comments