Snow is only fun when you have rear wheel drive.

No because when you have rear wheel drive and you go around a corner you oversteer and crash into a tree, and die. But with FWD you understeer into the tree, and die. So either way you die. (Mostly as said by Top Gear)

Depends. If you start to lose it on a bend in a front wheel drive car, the best you can do is try to match the speed of the front wheels to the speed of the car and the road, to minimise skidding, and then either very lightly brake to slow it down, or apply a very small amount of power to pull it round. In a rear wheel drive car, you can, if you're good, lock the steering round in the direction you want to go, give it a big bootful of power, throw the tail out very wide, and get the drive behind you, pushing you into, and around, the bend.

I know RWD is more fun and manageable. I wouldn't mind it

The design and engineering technicians at Saab (who you may remember were the first company to make a properly sporty sports car with front wheel drive, and have always used FWD on all but a few of their cars) say that the most power you can reasonably use in a FWD car is 220bhp. Even in a stright-line take-off, when the weight of the car shifts to the rear, the front is going to lose enough grip to render any excess power either useless or a hindrance.

Remember that next time you see "da rice boyz" bragging about the size of the turbo in their FWD shite.

Anything over 220bhp in a FWD is just a way to burn though tires faster. I laugh at "da rice boyz",as you call,them, when they brag, just for that reason.
ricer: "I got 450bhp in my Civic"
Me: *trying not to laugh hysterically in his face and failing miserably*

I do that every time it rains and scare other drivers. I drive a Ford Ranger, RWD.