It's not all beer and skittles (what the hell are skittles, anyway??) in the Tucson Mob. But when Wolf asked me to keep his coke stash for him, I was touched. It showed he trusted me. Mainly because I swore off Coke after I found out Coca-Cola sponsored death squads to kill and intimidate labor organizers, south of the border. My grandpa was a two-fisted union organizer who fought for the working man, both with his fists and in the Althing. So Coke is off my shopping list forever. Besides, it's all High Fructose Corn Syrup, and that stuff is bad for you.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 969 x 700px
File Size 55.5 kB
Sir!! Umm.. If that's a genuine gun with a REALLY illegal silencer, then dare I suggest you immediately delete this image and
hope the authorities don't take notice? Just a random scary thought.
Stoopid frigging gun laws that don't allow silencers, 36 inch magazines, muzzle breaks, full automatics and WMD's! :)
hope the authorities don't take notice? Just a random scary thought.
Stoopid frigging gun laws that don't allow silencers, 36 inch magazines, muzzle breaks, full automatics and WMD's! :)
Silencers aren't, per-se, illegal. Depending on your state, local law enforcement, and BATFE, you can file to own one and if they issue the papers, all you need to do is pay the $200 tax stamp, and then pay for the silencer itself.
36 inch magazines? That is one *big* magazine. I assume you mean high-capacity mags. Also not illegal per-se, but restricted in some states.
Muzzle-brakes have never been illegal, flash-hiders were restricted on "assault weapons" under the Clinton administration, but that ban expired.
Automatic weapons also are not "illegal" and the process for acquiring one is exactly the same as a silencer. Just expect to pay a *large* sum for one, because there are no more being produced for civilian ownership.
And Weapons of Mass Distraction? What do you think FA is?! :-D
36 inch magazines? That is one *big* magazine. I assume you mean high-capacity mags. Also not illegal per-se, but restricted in some states.
Muzzle-brakes have never been illegal, flash-hiders were restricted on "assault weapons" under the Clinton administration, but that ban expired.
Automatic weapons also are not "illegal" and the process for acquiring one is exactly the same as a silencer. Just expect to pay a *large* sum for one, because there are no more being produced for civilian ownership.
And Weapons of Mass Distraction? What do you think FA is?! :-D
they arent illegal if you get the damn hard to obtain license for it. the mob is careful when it comes to that. you should see wolf's HOUSE! lol hes got everything from ammunition to mortars and artillery. even has the predecessor to the stinger missile launcher. its really quite something to see. on top of that, its all federally registered. i love Arizona!
Actually the US does have strict manufacture of silencers through the National Firearms Act. They are legal for individuals to possess and use for lawful purposes in thirty-eight of the fifty states. However, a prospective user must go through an application process administered by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), which requires a Federal tax payment of US$200.00 and a thorough criminal background check.
Whaaat?
Looks like everyone's filled you in on the NFA laws concerning suppressors, which are completely legal in most states, including Arizona.
But for the rest, I'm not sure what you mean by 36" magazines, but other than a few crap states that have capacity bans on magazines, you can have whatever you want as far as capacity. There are some race shotguns, even, that have magazine tube extensions that almost do make it to 36".
Muzzle breaks have always been legal. Flash hiders and threaded muzzles, however, were banned on new production firearms between '94 and '04 in the horrible Assault Weapon Ban that, while Clinton said it would dramatically reduce gun crime, can't be shown to have helped at all. It banned flash suppressors, but did not have any effect on muzzle breaks.
Full autos are legal, so long as they're pre-'86 manufactured and registered, and transferring them requires a $200 tax stamp, same as a suppressor.
Kinda sucks that hearing protection is in almost the same class as a machine gun, doesn't it? In fact, some countries require shooting with suppressors to keep noise pollution down. Unfortunately, Americans see in movies that assassins use suppressors, so they decide that they're evil, instead of being a good way to keep shooting ranges quieter.
As for WMDs, while there are laws restricting ownership of some materials required to make some of them, they are by no means illegal. Hell, I own some nice bits of tritium. Using them, of course, would be illegal, but given the prohibitive cost of manufacturing them, and the massive effect it would have, it's highly unlikely that anyone would use one. Hell, most countries don't even have any nukes.
Looks like everyone's filled you in on the NFA laws concerning suppressors, which are completely legal in most states, including Arizona.
But for the rest, I'm not sure what you mean by 36" magazines, but other than a few crap states that have capacity bans on magazines, you can have whatever you want as far as capacity. There are some race shotguns, even, that have magazine tube extensions that almost do make it to 36".
Muzzle breaks have always been legal. Flash hiders and threaded muzzles, however, were banned on new production firearms between '94 and '04 in the horrible Assault Weapon Ban that, while Clinton said it would dramatically reduce gun crime, can't be shown to have helped at all. It banned flash suppressors, but did not have any effect on muzzle breaks.
Full autos are legal, so long as they're pre-'86 manufactured and registered, and transferring them requires a $200 tax stamp, same as a suppressor.
Kinda sucks that hearing protection is in almost the same class as a machine gun, doesn't it? In fact, some countries require shooting with suppressors to keep noise pollution down. Unfortunately, Americans see in movies that assassins use suppressors, so they decide that they're evil, instead of being a good way to keep shooting ranges quieter.
As for WMDs, while there are laws restricting ownership of some materials required to make some of them, they are by no means illegal. Hell, I own some nice bits of tritium. Using them, of course, would be illegal, but given the prohibitive cost of manufacturing them, and the massive effect it would have, it's highly unlikely that anyone would use one. Hell, most countries don't even have any nukes.
The P99's are fairly reliable Firearms. although my favorite wather has to be the P22.
For the price of 14 dollars for 1 thousand rounds of .22LR you dont need to hesitate to lay into that home invader. i plan to get one as soon as i turn 21. perfect in my opinion for personal defense. to me a .357 is just over kill if someone is trying to assault you, Armed or not. i would never stick a gemtec suppressor on such a beautiful fram though. :(
For the price of 14 dollars for 1 thousand rounds of .22LR you dont need to hesitate to lay into that home invader. i plan to get one as soon as i turn 21. perfect in my opinion for personal defense. to me a .357 is just over kill if someone is trying to assault you, Armed or not. i would never stick a gemtec suppressor on such a beautiful fram though. :(
oh yes! a good 20 gauge is alway the prime choice. but for those on a tight budget like myself, cant afford a shotgun and a pistol. the .22 i can have O.C. with me out and about in town. with exception to certain places that do not allow weapons, in that case you do not have to relinquish your firearm unless they have apropriate lockers for it, but if they ask you to and they dont its best to just comply as they can get the police involved, and thats never fun. so the better judgement for all who do carry, if your not sure you can take it, dont. if you have a lockable glove box then take it everywhere lol.
12 GA pump action pistol grip stock...00 buck is hard to argue with, though "bird shot" can be as effective. i just like the penetration damage of 00, and at close quarters both are just as effective. "This is my >Boom-Stick<" :P
Ah yes, "Victim disarmament" laws, makes me wonder what kind of lobby the criminals and street thugs have to get these passed to help assure their potential targets cant shoot back?
--Rick
:cd
Ah yes, "Victim disarmament" laws, makes me wonder what kind of lobby the criminals and street thugs have to get these passed to help assure their potential targets cant shoot back?
--Rick
:cd
One's finger should never be on the trigger until you are ready to fire. The user is the first safety on any firearm. Unfortuantely, that's why there are so many accidents. But on a Glock, the finger must have tensed enough to first depress the safety, then more to engage the sear, and release the firing pin. there is no hammer, a Glock is striker fired.
hhheeheee, Well, now. That may be now but what about then? I remember reading an account of a man paying off a debt to a neighbor at the Althingr one year when a certain son of a certain lady walked up and took his head off with one swing of the son's axe.
And the debt payer's head was heard to utter "Seven.." as it flew thru the air.
Ah Iceland in the summer. Bwahahahaahahahaaha.
(yes, i am a classics reader)
And the debt payer's head was heard to utter "Seven.." as it flew thru the air.
Ah Iceland in the summer. Bwahahahaahahahaaha.
(yes, i am a classics reader)
FA+

Comments