I've discovered that everything I dislike about oil paint is negated by painting on bristol. Oil is now my new best friend.
I painted all day. This is the first result. Painted alla prima (finished all at one time) in maybe... an hour and a half. Something like that. it's 9" by 6"
I maaay get back into it and flesh out some areas later on. I'm not certain yet.
I painted all day. This is the first result. Painted alla prima (finished all at one time) in maybe... an hour and a half. Something like that. it's 9" by 6"
I maaay get back into it and flesh out some areas later on. I'm not certain yet.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 399 x 596px
File Size 272.5 kB
Sometimes I see a picture of yours or some other awesome person's authorship that is completely perfect as far as my tastes are concerned, but I just can't fish out this little realization of just what does the trick in making this piece perfect. So I do the best I can without resorting to posting long-winded self-absorbed struggle to get the jist of how I feel about the drawing(kinda like what I do right now): I fave it. So it's not that I don't regard the picture highly enough to comment - it's that I can't dredge up any epithets worthy of it's awesomeness.
This is precisely the case with this picture. I've seen orginal Aivazovsky pieces in the national gallery and this painting of yours. while not being a wall-large and being worth a decade of effort, does quite similiar things to my retinas, eliciting a prolongued staring at the painting with a slacked jaw and occasional drooling. All that intuitional/ingenious usage of whitish paint for both sea foam and reflections on turbulent water's surface, dim light of the backgound that seems to somehow pierce the thick waves, exposing the cashe of gemstones within - it's all the same great marine artists' fare.
But yours has a dragon in it ! Yay dragon ! Or is it sea serpent or a saltwater elemental ? No matter, still awesome ;3
Also, those little technical nuances you muse over now and then give the bouquet of your art an extra charm.
This is precisely the case with this picture. I've seen orginal Aivazovsky pieces in the national gallery and this painting of yours. while not being a wall-large and being worth a decade of effort, does quite similiar things to my retinas, eliciting a prolongued staring at the painting with a slacked jaw and occasional drooling. All that intuitional/ingenious usage of whitish paint for both sea foam and reflections on turbulent water's surface, dim light of the backgound that seems to somehow pierce the thick waves, exposing the cashe of gemstones within - it's all the same great marine artists' fare.
But yours has a dragon in it ! Yay dragon ! Or is it sea serpent or a saltwater elemental ? No matter, still awesome ;3
Also, those little technical nuances you muse over now and then give the bouquet of your art an extra charm.
I love how there are very few distinct outlines and that the colors are all in the yellow/green range. We can clearly see the sea beast, but every piece of it could be rationalized as something less out-of-the-ordinary given the context... like catching a glimpse of the Loch Ness monster as you turned your head, but, thinking back, it could have been just a log with an awkward shadow, or some such. A monster you can remember, but almost deniable.
FA+

Comments