Nicely drafted, too much details and small stuff for an actual watermark/logo tho

I intentionally make them with details <,< i like my watermarks complicated

So you intend them to require a fairly large portion of the image they brand?

can make them as big or small as one pleases, its no different from a less detailed graphic in terms of the space it would take up. only diff is more lines..i dont see the science behind them being simpler or complicated.

what i meant was that if you downsize it part of the detailwork will turn into a blur or fragment.

I still dunno about that, i've been using my own more complicated logo as a watermark for years and I nor anyone else has called that out. and i looked up logo design, mine may be complicated but they are not overly complicated...i, not trying to be defensive and im aware many logo artists prefer simpler shapes and graphics...but my logos have never interfered with my works, at least not as much as any other type of graphic would interfere with their work.

And yes though some minor details may dissapear when shrunk, i believe the key defining details will still be there...unless i shrink them really small, but then nothing would be visible.

If you're fine with that then i have no objections; it's yours after all.

Thanks, but i will keep your words in mind, they hold relevance, but im pretty sure I have it all planned out.

also <,< they can all be vectored rather easily, if that were another problem

That mouth.
You crack me up little buddy.