Jumping into the Rocket bandwagon even though I have not watch the movie yet :P
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 662 x 613px
File Size 88.4 kB
I know but... I have a feeling it's an age restriction somewhere in the TOS >.> I am not sure. Unless you have adult filter active it is illegal, however if you are a member and can only see the clean art then I guess that is fine? I dunno, I am not a mod and I dont know FA's TOS on the top of my head.
well call me wierd, but i find you're being seriously disturbed seriously disturbing. i would also call being seriously disturbed by THAT being one of the things that ARE worse.
to each their own and you too of course, but to each THEIR own, is rather precisely the point.
if there is one thing that IS seriously wrong, it is the aggressiveness of gratuitous pseudo-conventionality.
14, 4, or 400.
to each their own and you too of course, but to each THEIR own, is rather precisely the point.
if there is one thing that IS seriously wrong, it is the aggressiveness of gratuitous pseudo-conventionality.
14, 4, or 400.
I'd like to point out that:
"Obscenity
In June 1973 in Miller v. California, the Supreme Court held in a 5-to-4 decision that obscene materials do not enjoy First Amendment protection.
In Miller v. California (1973), the court refined the definition of “obscenity” established in Roth v. United States (1957). It also rejected the “utterly without redeeming social value” test of Memoirs v. Massachusetts.
In the three-part Miller test, three questions must receive affirmative responses for material to be considered “obscene”:
Would the average person, applying the contemporary community standards, viewing the work as a whole, find the work appeals to the prurient interest?
Does the work depict or describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way?
Does the work taken as a whole lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
One must distinguish “obscene” material, speech not protected by the First Amendment, from “indecent” material, speech protected for adults but not for children. The Supreme Court also ruled that “higher standards” may be established to protect minors from exposure to indecent material over the airwaves. In FCC v. Pacifica Foundation the court “recognized an interest in protecting minors from exposure to vulgar and offensive spoken language.”
Source:
http://www.freedomforum.org/package.....edomSpeech.htm
Even if did protect your right to be a creep, just imagine how the author would feel like if a minor is having fetish thoughts about their PG works? It's not unheard of artists leaving the fandom completely over creepy behavior. If you can't understand that, if you can't relate to the people outraged by your conduct, you must have some sort of social disorder, please consider seeking professional help.
"Obscenity
In June 1973 in Miller v. California, the Supreme Court held in a 5-to-4 decision that obscene materials do not enjoy First Amendment protection.
In Miller v. California (1973), the court refined the definition of “obscenity” established in Roth v. United States (1957). It also rejected the “utterly without redeeming social value” test of Memoirs v. Massachusetts.
In the three-part Miller test, three questions must receive affirmative responses for material to be considered “obscene”:
Would the average person, applying the contemporary community standards, viewing the work as a whole, find the work appeals to the prurient interest?
Does the work depict or describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way?
Does the work taken as a whole lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
One must distinguish “obscene” material, speech not protected by the First Amendment, from “indecent” material, speech protected for adults but not for children. The Supreme Court also ruled that “higher standards” may be established to protect minors from exposure to indecent material over the airwaves. In FCC v. Pacifica Foundation the court “recognized an interest in protecting minors from exposure to vulgar and offensive spoken language.”
Source:
http://www.freedomforum.org/package.....edomSpeech.htm
Even if did protect your right to be a creep, just imagine how the author would feel like if a minor is having fetish thoughts about their PG works? It's not unheard of artists leaving the fandom completely over creepy behavior. If you can't understand that, if you can't relate to the people outraged by your conduct, you must have some sort of social disorder, please consider seeking professional help.
Hah. Awesome job on this. Super adorable, while also capturing so much of his personality. <3
And I politely disagree with theinsane63. The movie is a fun mixture of humor and action, that works wonderfully at giving some of that good old escapism, that these types of movies are designed for.
There are certainly elements that can be nitpicked, but it works on every level they were trying to get it to work on. I highly recommend seeing it. :)
And I politely disagree with theinsane63. The movie is a fun mixture of humor and action, that works wonderfully at giving some of that good old escapism, that these types of movies are designed for.
There are certainly elements that can be nitpicked, but it works on every level they were trying to get it to work on. I highly recommend seeing it. :)
Es muy muy lindo y fantastica!
Taking Spanish class, trying to use it even if Im speaking to anyone that does, make it gel in my brain more but I digress;
It is adorable and this movie is the best superhero movie I have seen period. It hits all the right notes and has a character
appropriate soundtrack which is also just fantastic choices in of itself.
Taking Spanish class, trying to use it even if Im speaking to anyone that does, make it gel in my brain more but I digress;
It is adorable and this movie is the best superhero movie I have seen period. It hits all the right notes and has a character
appropriate soundtrack which is also just fantastic choices in of itself.
FA+

Comments