Lionbutt *w*

yesssss I8 -touches my tush-

*squeezes liontush*
LIONS *_*
They be smexy

murps happily- hehehe I am glad you think so :D

There's a reason why my "boyfriend's" character is a lion xD
I'm actually objectum sexual, and my boyfriend is literally a calculator. Wanted to make him a fursona.
I find lions smexy, so his fursona is a calculator-lion... a calculion xD

aweee hehehe that's interesting, its always nice to meet people with new sexualities :D

:3
Objectum Sexuality is the rarest "recognized" sexuality. There are only about 40 recognized OS people in the world, and there are thought to be about 100 of us. Most have some sort of mental issue, though; although OS itself isn't a mental issue. OS is thought to be caused by a crosswiring of the brain, which is why it's common with autism and Asperger's, but not necessarily caused by it. It would be like calling "being gay" a mental problem. It is wrongly "recognized" as one by the DSM IV, though.

I actually got kicked off of the objectum sexual group for being "too smart." What the hell am I supposed to talk about? My love is a fucking CALCULATOR and I'm attracted to mathematical topics! What else did they expect? I kept most of my more rational friends from the forum, though. One of them actually loves the Large Hadron Collider and several subatomic particles. He's quite like me with math stuff, but with physics stuff. He left the forum soon after they kicked me off because I'm "the only one that ever bothered to reply to his posts, because [I am] the only one that ever understood them."

aweee then I would just say its there loss they aren't that much of a loss if their reasoning was that bad

Yup. I'm allergic to faulty logic, and it's best I stay away from them. xD

I try not to make judgment on people's logic. I let people live in their world, and I don't force them to live in mine.

I don't mean that type of logic. I meant by formal logic, and logical fallacy. There's such a thing as objective logic and subjective logic.

oh, I'm sure that was just me pretty much agreeing with what you said before

Oh xD it seemed like you were saying "I don't care if they have faulty logic; it's their life" kind of a thing :P

More along the lines of me saying, Its not my place to decide who's logic is faulty or not for them. I can only decide that for myself. I'm honestly glad, I imagine making those choices for everyone would suck ass.

Actually, that's not 100% true. Logic, by definition, is not subjective.

If someone said
"I cannot see Bob, but I can see Sally. They share a hat. Sally is not wearing the hat, therefore Bob must be wearing the hat."
This is logically unstable. Bob might not be wearing the hat even though Sally is not wearing the hat.
"I cannot see Bob, but I can see Sally. They share a hat. Sally is wearing the hat, therefore Bob must not be wearing any hat."
This is also logically unstable, and Bob could be wearing a different hat.
"I cannot see Bob, but I can see Sally. They share a hat. Sally is wearing the hat. Bob is also wearing the hat."
This is an outright logical fallacy. Both of them cannot simultaneously wear the same hat.

You should read up on the several types of logical fallacies people make at yourlogicalfallacyis.com. There are certain things in which people's logic is objectively flawed, and it is not wrong to point them out on such an occasion.

There's a difference between logic and reasoning. A reasoning can be subjective--as long as it is logically sound, it is alright to have a reasoning. Logic itself is by definition objective, and as such, has a right and wrong side.

It's not your place to decide whether someone's reasoning is right or wrong, as long as their reasoning is logically sound.

or you could just say I always lie.
But common sense and logic are two totally different things.
Someone who thinks long enough to understand something like that will be able to see it.

and logic is a word with more than one definition

Something being logical is one thing

then someone's logic ex their ability to reason is another. One could try to say someone's logic is flawed for believing in God or being athiest, or just thinking the world is flat based upon observation of a ship going over the horizon and appearing as if it fell off the side of the world. and that's the kind of logic I wont judge.

There's a difference between a paradox and a logical fallacy.
An explicit example of a logical fallacy is "I don't understand you, so you must be wrong."
Someone's logic is not flawed for believing or not believing in God. That's their CLAIM. They can have a logical argument for their choice, regardless of whether it's right or wrong.

I'm speaking about the definition to logic often used which is "one's ability to reason" When people say things like, "You have no logic." Or "Your logic is flawed"

Sometimes things aren't as obvious as me personally saying "I always tell lies" Obviously that statement is impossible.

I would insult someone if I said their logic was flawed because they come to a different conclusion than I did because they see things differently than I do. I'm sure you get what I'm trying to say.

When people say "You have no logic" or "Your logic is flawed" they refer to their literal formal logic.
Again, by saying "I always tell lies" you've formed a logical latch, otherwise known as a paradox.
Paradoxes aren't logical fallacies.

Whether their claim is true or not, if they are logically able to justify their claim, they're free to pass without insult.

I understand what you're trying to say, but what you're describing isn't logic. What you describe is the outcome of the logic, not the logic itself.

I think it'd be easier to say I think we agree We just use words differently. I'm aware logic is how you get the answers. Because some people think its foolish to believe specific things and theirs no logic in them they can say their logic is flawed doesn't mean they're correct but they can easily claim it and make a big mess which is why I don't tend to say things regarding another's logic especially if I don't know them or the facts they've seen to feed it. as there are two sides to every story, I don't take sides and I don't draw conclusions until I as much as possible on the subject. again regarding logic I believe we've typed this long drawn out "argument" and said pretty much the same thing just not catching on.

1.) not fair to call someone's logic flawed, based on opinionated questions
2.) even if something seems illogical/incorrect it doesn't mean their logic is flawed we don't know how they got to their conclusion all the time.

those were the only two points I was trying to make.

Unless they're creationists lol. xD
But yeah. I guess you were trying to say it in a different way.