Now for a reminder for those who arn't all super with their history. THe Yalta Conference was then Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt meet to discuss the future for Europe and Germany. Today ont he 28th of May 2008 they are holding an Iraq Conference in Stockholm, Sweden.
Actualy I am living only about 5 minutes from where some delegates are staying. Which means that our policeforce has barricades ALLOT of the area around this hotel. They have closed down about two important roads, hell I had to drive around my whole community just to get into the nearby store to pick up some groceries.

My question would ofc be: Why here?
I think the reason would be that Sweden has taken in such huge numbers of Iraqi refugees and it gives us something to say about it. Though I am very much against that Gondelezza Rice is here. A woman who I really dispise, she has this "I am your dog Mr Bush" feeling about her. And why would our Primeminister Fredrik Reinfeldt directly greet her when that is the work our foreign.
Hey Fredrik why don't you just let her stomp on the otherside of your face?

But the thing that annoys me the most that we bring that warcriminal here (Rice) and that puppet Iraqi goverment people that they have brought with them. They might have been elected by the people, they will do whatever Bush wants them to anyway.

---

I have shadowed the part with the swedish flag since I feel ashamed that our weak and pathetical goverment has taken this in. On one side we are taking in refugees, on the other we are selling weapons to the Bush so he can continue using the USA military as chess pecies.
The position of the flags don't have much value, though the whole picture of leaders deciding the fate of a people who only have puppets to represent them, there is the meaning.

"The USA military is like a gun, it cannot choose where its pointing or who it is firing at. But suddenly the politicians squeeze the trigger, and this continues again and again"

---

"3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause
The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly."