Moderate Painterly Commission for
maundrill
Okay guys, I have a legitimate question: WHY are there so few dinosaur characters floating around this place!? I understand why there are a lot of canine and feline fursonas, since those are the animal types we interact most on a daily basis. But after that, what is the most awesome thing you could ever hope to be if you had a choice? UH, DINOSAURS, RIGHT!? *suddenly realizes she also doesn't have a dinosaur character* Aaand now I'm a hypocrite, hahaha. *derp*
Seriously though, this is an awesome T-rex character for the always wonderful Maundrill! His name is Tyson, and he's a rival to Maun's main eastern drake character. I'm really hoping he gets some sweet fighting commissions between the two of them someday. I think I've been on a fighting kick again... might need to take a commission in that theme to get it out of my system already, hah.
Anyway, commissions are opening tomorrow! Keep your eyes open for the journal, and in the meantime I'll get on updating some out of date information for it. And, as always, enjoy the arts! :D
maundrillOkay guys, I have a legitimate question: WHY are there so few dinosaur characters floating around this place!? I understand why there are a lot of canine and feline fursonas, since those are the animal types we interact most on a daily basis. But after that, what is the most awesome thing you could ever hope to be if you had a choice? UH, DINOSAURS, RIGHT!? *suddenly realizes she also doesn't have a dinosaur character* Aaand now I'm a hypocrite, hahaha. *derp*
Seriously though, this is an awesome T-rex character for the always wonderful Maundrill! His name is Tyson, and he's a rival to Maun's main eastern drake character. I'm really hoping he gets some sweet fighting commissions between the two of them someday. I think I've been on a fighting kick again... might need to take a commission in that theme to get it out of my system already, hah.
Anyway, commissions are opening tomorrow! Keep your eyes open for the journal, and in the meantime I'll get on updating some out of date information for it. And, as always, enjoy the arts! :D
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Dinosaur
Size 670 x 900px
File Size 426.2 kB
Well, that's a cute one. But he sure needs new clothes, unless he enjoys the tightness. XD
And yes, we need more dinos, instead of dragons and lizards!
I have one, but she's not ready yet, needs more concepts and research first, but once I can, Minerva will have her best friend drawn at last!
And yes, we need more dinos, instead of dragons and lizards!
I have one, but she's not ready yet, needs more concepts and research first, but once I can, Minerva will have her best friend drawn at last!
She's based on a raptor (the Jurassic Park ones, not the real ones palaeontologists "ruined" our childhood with XD) but has some unique features as a results of millions of years of evolution. So far, the only thing I have set is their females developped milk tanks similar to breasts but working differently. Also, each one has a unique tail pattern and females are usually taller and more muscular than males. But that's really all I have for now. :D
That is awesome! And since you're sticking to the Jurassic park body type (with no feathers) its easier to explain the divergent evolution lines. "Real" raptors turned into birds, where-as your raptors took on some more mammalian traits - or something like that. It sparks the imagination anyway. :D
Well we don't know that for sure, there's some theories now that dromaeosaurs and modern birds had a common ancestor but there's also a couple ideas that the long feathers on raptor arms led to flapping for stability when pounced on prey, introducing the concept of flapping wings to the evolutionary line.
Furthermore, to say that JP's depiction of Velociraptor Antirrhopus (more commonly known as Deinonychus) is somehow more mammalian is absurd, but then again so are most things when it comes to taxonomy. To put things simply, mammals are defined as mammals purely because they excrete milk and have a certain type of ear bone. That's literally it. The entire concept of "reptile" means extremely little to boot. The sooner people throw out traditional taxonomy in schools and start teaching clades the better.
(Fun fact, the lack of feathers isn't the biggest mistake on the jurassic park raptors - it's the wrists. The entire bone structure of the wrists in the movie is completely wrong, in real life they had very stiff wrists that faced inwards. The maxim "clappers not slappers!" will get you far!)
As for why there's so few dinosaur-sonas, it's probably because dinosaurs just aren't as popular as they were 20 years ago in the middle of the renaissance, and there's some extremely popular misconceptions out there right now, like the notion that T-Rex was a scavenger (extremely unlikely with more evidence supporting that it was an active hunter) and the idea that somehow, discovering that theropods had feathers "ruined" them. When pressed most people I've found say that feathers makes them look more like a giant chicken... which, from the stance of feathers being present is correct but not on any other. First off, though there are some similarities between the way feathers looked on theropods and some modern birds there's many differences too, like the bare feet on modern birds were not present on theropods and one must keep in mind that each creature would have feathers that fit and conform to the body. Anyone that needs evidence that feathers can look cool can simply google "bearded vulture," and anyone that thinks T-Rex was fat, fluffy and white like a chicken is just plain wrong.
Furthermore, to say that JP's depiction of Velociraptor Antirrhopus (more commonly known as Deinonychus) is somehow more mammalian is absurd, but then again so are most things when it comes to taxonomy. To put things simply, mammals are defined as mammals purely because they excrete milk and have a certain type of ear bone. That's literally it. The entire concept of "reptile" means extremely little to boot. The sooner people throw out traditional taxonomy in schools and start teaching clades the better.
(Fun fact, the lack of feathers isn't the biggest mistake on the jurassic park raptors - it's the wrists. The entire bone structure of the wrists in the movie is completely wrong, in real life they had very stiff wrists that faced inwards. The maxim "clappers not slappers!" will get you far!)
As for why there's so few dinosaur-sonas, it's probably because dinosaurs just aren't as popular as they were 20 years ago in the middle of the renaissance, and there's some extremely popular misconceptions out there right now, like the notion that T-Rex was a scavenger (extremely unlikely with more evidence supporting that it was an active hunter) and the idea that somehow, discovering that theropods had feathers "ruined" them. When pressed most people I've found say that feathers makes them look more like a giant chicken... which, from the stance of feathers being present is correct but not on any other. First off, though there are some similarities between the way feathers looked on theropods and some modern birds there's many differences too, like the bare feet on modern birds were not present on theropods and one must keep in mind that each creature would have feathers that fit and conform to the body. Anyone that needs evidence that feathers can look cool can simply google "bearded vulture," and anyone that thinks T-Rex was fat, fluffy and white like a chicken is just plain wrong.
Yikes, you took my mammalian comment to mean something completely different than what I intended it to mean. Obviously even if dinosaurs as we know them were stripped of their feathers, they wouldn't suddenly "be" mammals, and that wasn't what I was trying to say either. If you wanted to make my idea more scientifically sound you'd need to instead have a mammal species evolve that happened to look exactly like raptors at some point (though with skin instead of scales). But these are fantasy creatures in fantasy worlds, so regular evolutionary rules don't have to apply - and that was the premise I was operating under when I wrote that comment. Especially since Tani's characters often stretch the bounds of what we see in the normal world (and that's completely fine)!
I personally think feathers on dinosaurs are fine. It's just a problem of people having to give up an idea that they were used to and grew fond of as a child. I'm sure if we were able to see dinosaurs with feathers in real life they'd look pretty fucking awesome, just like birds look pretty sweet themselves right now.
I personally think feathers on dinosaurs are fine. It's just a problem of people having to give up an idea that they were used to and grew fond of as a child. I'm sure if we were able to see dinosaurs with feathers in real life they'd look pretty fucking awesome, just like birds look pretty sweet themselves right now.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I'd be butchered by any scientist if I said one of my characters is a sentient raptor with milk bags looking like breasts.
Granted, while I try to make the science in the NCISverse a bit harder than usual science-fiction, there are other things that push it to fantasy levels like having... "something" in this universe that allows various impressive feats and even reality-warping abilities to some creatures (humans get the shaft again, though) and a huge Dead-Space-Marker-style monolith to create entire new planets and civilizations from apparently nothing by just having humans "commission" them.
So I think a giant Deinonychus that can talk, who has breasts and planet-sized sapient ships that sit on gravity laws would be the least of my worries. XD
Granted, while I try to make the science in the NCISverse a bit harder than usual science-fiction, there are other things that push it to fantasy levels like having... "something" in this universe that allows various impressive feats and even reality-warping abilities to some creatures (humans get the shaft again, though) and a huge Dead-Space-Marker-style monolith to create entire new planets and civilizations from apparently nothing by just having humans "commission" them.
So I think a giant Deinonychus that can talk, who has breasts and planet-sized sapient ships that sit on gravity laws would be the least of my worries. XD
I would be agree with Liz up there. There is more Lizard and Dragons than dinosaurs as a 'sona. I do have a dinosaur character from my character list on my laptop, but I didnt thought to make it as a commission though.
*Thinking like a derp*
I think that you will get 2 commission from me instead of 1, Sara. XD.
*Thinking like a derp*
I think that you will get 2 commission from me instead of 1, Sara. XD.
FA+

Comments