i can agree 57 is a bit smal but if you shoot against lightly armed landing craft you dont need the bigg guns like the 406mm guns.
This battery was then replaced in 1975 by a 75 mm tornpjäs m/57
True. But it seems like such an effort just to put a 57mm gun in there.
One would have thought it'd be better(And cheaper!) with a well camoflaged AT-Gun.
But a 75mm gun sounds far more aproperiate for a bunker/fortification weapon.
Comments