See that balance beam, its a great way to learn balance, just watch out for that moss, makes for a SLIPPERY time. Anyway, this balance beam is just one of the ways across the fen, I'm standing on one of the other 'balance beams' thats just a bit wider and easier to navagate than the one pictured.
Category Photography / Scenery
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 960 x 720px
File Size 319.6 kB
And yeah, most certainly a soft landing! http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7799739/
If I had a dime for every fisherman, clammer and crabber in Shinneycock Bay who had to be rescued because they made the mistake of wearing rubber, boot-foot waders in a muddy area, I would be a wealthy bat. Stocking-foot waders would be a much better choice, or no waders at all. There's just too much suction, and not enough leverage to pull yourself out.
I generally go with a dance outfit, and always full leg coverage unless It gets down to something I fully trust and is a licuid sloppy muck. This is soft and thick, and indeed loaded with little twigs n sticks, and is a navagational challenge.
So leggings, below, tights on top of that, knee socks, then leather ballet slippers and a leotard, and its all good. The tights often come out looking like hell, but tights vs muddy multch, is rarely a functional combination. Makes for easy cleaning after the muck though, and completes the outfit.
So leggings, below, tights on top of that, knee socks, then leather ballet slippers and a leotard, and its all good. The tights often come out looking like hell, but tights vs muddy multch, is rarely a functional combination. Makes for easy cleaning after the muck though, and completes the outfit.
That mud looks lovely, but I wouldn't want to go there in fursuit. I would, however, go mudding elsewhere in fursuit, someplace where there aren't so many sticks that could shred my fur!
By the way, these two pictures: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7799739/ and http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7799926/ did NOT need to be rated "Adult". I had to turn my filter off to see them, and I admit I was rather wary about what I might see. But I was not disappointed. In fact, I doubt they even qualify as "Mature". They look perfectly General-rated to me---at least Part 4 did. Part 5, MAYBE mature because of your rear end showing, but there doesn't even appear to be an ATTEMPT at a sexual theme there. The Adult rating is only necessary for pictures (or stories etc.) that depict actual sexual activity (humping, jerking off, etc.) or really hard-core fetish content. Non-sexual nudity qualifies as Mature, and merely lacking clothes doesn't necessarily qualify as nudity. There are countless pictures of furry characters without clothes, and yet they're not nude. Their fur serves them as a covering. Look in my Gallery, if you want. I think I have only one or two pictures of Redstripe (myself) wearing clothes, yet I've never posted anything rated above General. (Mature art is probably coming, but the rating will be for blood and violence, not nudity.)
By the way, these two pictures: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7799739/ and http://www.furaffinity.net/view/7799926/ did NOT need to be rated "Adult". I had to turn my filter off to see them, and I admit I was rather wary about what I might see. But I was not disappointed. In fact, I doubt they even qualify as "Mature". They look perfectly General-rated to me---at least Part 4 did. Part 5, MAYBE mature because of your rear end showing, but there doesn't even appear to be an ATTEMPT at a sexual theme there. The Adult rating is only necessary for pictures (or stories etc.) that depict actual sexual activity (humping, jerking off, etc.) or really hard-core fetish content. Non-sexual nudity qualifies as Mature, and merely lacking clothes doesn't necessarily qualify as nudity. There are countless pictures of furry characters without clothes, and yet they're not nude. Their fur serves them as a covering. Look in my Gallery, if you want. I think I have only one or two pictures of Redstripe (myself) wearing clothes, yet I've never posted anything rated above General. (Mature art is probably coming, but the rating will be for blood and violence, not nudity.)
I prefer to stay on the side of caution, while they are tasteful nudes, (dirty) Some folks don't want to necessarily see all that there is to see out there, and I fully respect that. If you have a question about a series or series of pictures posted to my site, or wonder how something continues. Several peices of mine are listed as adult only have nude content which does offend some folks. Carrie and friends aren't particularly adult, and it could be seen as a poor gesture of them without clothing and pictures. I realize they are drawn characters and 'not real' but the implication is there. No juicy bits are showing even if she is completely nude in that scene, that is the only reason I placed such a tag upon them.
I know that. And that's why I looked at those pictures in the fist place, because I know you don't draw or commission truly "Adult" stuff. I suggest you go read the Acceptable Upload Policy here: http://help.furaffinity.net/article.....olicy-AUP.html . Definitions of ratings are at the very top.
But if you're at all uncertain even after reading that, then I agree with you---better safe than sorry.
But if you're at all uncertain even after reading that, then I agree with you---better safe than sorry.
FA+

Comments