For reference, this was one of my Ripley designs actually intended for things. It was generally deemed too realistic, and a lot of people found underwear too risky.
Which I think is prudish in a 17+ styleguide for a violent piece. But I dont want to whine anymore. I think the other angle was that if she is an action girl she must be tomboyish and thus cannot wear frills, or something, but 1890 is frilly and I don't think 95% of tomboys care, even if that was my angle. Idk.
We did keep the oversized captain jacket, and I really like that.
tl;dr I'm directing my first film and I can't have my way, baww
Which I think is prudish in a 17+ styleguide for a violent piece. But I dont want to whine anymore. I think the other angle was that if she is an action girl she must be tomboyish and thus cannot wear frills, or something, but 1890 is frilly and I don't think 95% of tomboys care, even if that was my angle. Idk.
We did keep the oversized captain jacket, and I really like that.
tl;dr I'm directing my first film and I can't have my way, baww
Category Artwork (Digital) / Human
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 935 x 1280px
File Size 155.5 kB
FA+

Comments