Heh, finally got into taking these.. as they have been requested loooong time :)
Category Photography / Fursuit
Species Coyote
Size 731 x 1024px
File Size 377.6 kB
They usually ding it under the AUP's Photography clause in the "What We Don't Permit" section: "depicting sexual content (human or animal)". They count diapers as sexual/fetish gear, and that's why a lot of these photos get tossed. :) However, it usually takes someone filing an active complaint for them to notice.
That said, padded fursuits are awesome, and this is very cute. Thanks for posting! <3
That said, padded fursuits are awesome, and this is very cute. Thanks for posting! <3
When did FA suddenly adopt victorian era decency standards with regards to risque' costume accesories? Especially with all the nasty pronz they allow everyday. I can understand them not allowing hardcore porn photography, as that opens up a whole new can of worms with regards to moderation responsibilities and the legality of what people post. But photos like this are actually quite tame. An average person who is unfamiliar with the ABDL lifestyle wouldn't see this as a sexual thing at all. And it really isn't in this context anyway. If it was, by that standard, a photo of police officers arresting a suspect would be innapropriate for FA, because handcuffs are a fetish item, and the police are putting them on FORCIBLY! This photo is clean and innocent enough that, with a clever enough caption to make it funny, you could insert it into a church bulletin on sunday and get away with it. Granted, that would require some explanation. :P I'm going to show it to one of my co-workers here and se what he thinks. With all that being said, This photo is really cute and I love it!
FA+

Comments