FA+
Shop
5887
Views
Views
275
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1188 x 1127
File Size 395.8 kB
Report this content
More from Wen
Commission for 
la_lobo-zorro and 
Kyosaki_Raven
la_lobo-zorro and 
Kyosaki_Raven
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1188 x 1127px
File Size 395.8 kB
As someone who's studying psychology, don't mix your kid with your fetish in ANY way. You'll do serious damage to your kid's mind. I cannot even begin to tell you how incredibly fucking wrong what you're talking about doing is. This isn't a personal attack on you or your values: this is a serious issue that you need to know about.
Wean, not wing, and furthermore, what you are talking about is NOT the same thing. It's not even CLOSE. Children are different. They potty train when they are ready. Forcing them to potty train early can be JUST as damaging as keeping them in diapers too long. I cannot stress what I am saying enough: THINK BEFORE YOU DO THIS.
This isn't fun for the child. It's only fun for you. If you insist on doing this, you WILL do irreparable harm to your child's mental state as they develop.
What if someone thought it was okay to have their child watch them and their wife play strip poker? I've seen that lead to the child growing up to be a pedophile.
How about dressing your child up in clothes of the opposite gender when they are already displaying set gender roles?
What about tying your kid up alongside you when you and your wife decide to explore bondage?
Are you starting to see what's wrong with this situation?
This isn't fun for the child. It's only fun for you. If you insist on doing this, you WILL do irreparable harm to your child's mental state as they develop.
What if someone thought it was okay to have their child watch them and their wife play strip poker? I've seen that lead to the child growing up to be a pedophile.
How about dressing your child up in clothes of the opposite gender when they are already displaying set gender roles?
What about tying your kid up alongside you when you and your wife decide to explore bondage?
Are you starting to see what's wrong with this situation?
Thanks. I'm not doing it just because I can, though. This is a really serious issue, and as someone who is a psych major about to get his Bachelor's degree, it's of grave concern to me what is being talked about here. I may not be an expert on child psychology, but I have taken enough courses to know just how damaging something like this can be to a child's psyche, and that's why I'm so vehemently trying to get my point across.
I do appreciate the compliment, though, and I feel the same about you. It's nice to see other people who know how to think critically and express themselves well.
I do appreciate the compliment, though, and I feel the same about you. It's nice to see other people who know how to think critically and express themselves well.
First off, no, that is NOT what you said. You said "i planed on keeping my kid in diapers a little longer than avarage". That's not letting your child do as they want. That's you making them do something they aren't comfortable with because you like it.
Second, I knew this is how you'd respond to that, and no, that isn't what I'm saying at all. More children are fucked in the head because their parents force gender roles onto them instead of letting them express themselves for how they feel. It's called gender identity disorder, and if not addressed, can lead to the person committing suicide because they are so unhappy with their biological gender, and being forced to abide by and conform to the gender norms of a sex they do not identify with.
Furthermore, telling your child they can do anything that they please is a sure-fire way to damage them as well. Children need both freedom AND discipline in varying amounts.
Finally, as for the bondage thing not happening in "practical life"? The simple fact that we're having this discussion PROVES that messed up stuff like that DOES happen, as what you're talking about is along the exact same lines. You are forcing your child to partake in a fetish that you enjoy, and the child does not. Whether you realize it or not, what you are talking about doing is abusing your position as a parent, along with the power which that position entails, in order to fulfill your fetishistic desires. You even blatantly state "Diapers are sexual for me also". The fact that you are forcing this fetish onto your potential child is wrong in more ways than one, and you should give serious thought to what you are doing.
Your child cannot give consent, so forcing them to do something that is of a sexual nature is inherently wrong, and could indeed get the child taken away from you, just as the bondage situation could.
Second, I knew this is how you'd respond to that, and no, that isn't what I'm saying at all. More children are fucked in the head because their parents force gender roles onto them instead of letting them express themselves for how they feel. It's called gender identity disorder, and if not addressed, can lead to the person committing suicide because they are so unhappy with their biological gender, and being forced to abide by and conform to the gender norms of a sex they do not identify with.
Furthermore, telling your child they can do anything that they please is a sure-fire way to damage them as well. Children need both freedom AND discipline in varying amounts.
Finally, as for the bondage thing not happening in "practical life"? The simple fact that we're having this discussion PROVES that messed up stuff like that DOES happen, as what you're talking about is along the exact same lines. You are forcing your child to partake in a fetish that you enjoy, and the child does not. Whether you realize it or not, what you are talking about doing is abusing your position as a parent, along with the power which that position entails, in order to fulfill your fetishistic desires. You even blatantly state "Diapers are sexual for me also". The fact that you are forcing this fetish onto your potential child is wrong in more ways than one, and you should give serious thought to what you are doing.
Your child cannot give consent, so forcing them to do something that is of a sexual nature is inherently wrong, and could indeed get the child taken away from you, just as the bondage situation could.
You keep saying that you wouldn't be forcing it on your kid, but you clearly stated the contrary in your initial post. So which is it?
You really don't seem to understand the consequences of what you're talking about doing, and that worries me greatly, if only for the resulting impact the choices you speak of making will have on your future child's life.
I've seen what happens to kids who get this kind of thing in their life early on. It without fail fucks them up in the head.
Furthermore, the way you're arguing is exactly the same manner in which a pedophile justifies their actions. They claim they're teaching their prey about their own sexuality at an early age. They justify it as "healthy" and "perfectly normal" when literally ALL evidence points to the contrary. Don't get me wrong, I'm not calling you a pedophile here. Just stating that you're using the exact same logical fallacies that one uses, and it's very telling of your own mental state.
At this point I can only sincerely hope that you will consider what I've said to you, and not let your parental decisions be dictated by your fetish.
You really don't seem to understand the consequences of what you're talking about doing, and that worries me greatly, if only for the resulting impact the choices you speak of making will have on your future child's life.
I've seen what happens to kids who get this kind of thing in their life early on. It without fail fucks them up in the head.
Furthermore, the way you're arguing is exactly the same manner in which a pedophile justifies their actions. They claim they're teaching their prey about their own sexuality at an early age. They justify it as "healthy" and "perfectly normal" when literally ALL evidence points to the contrary. Don't get me wrong, I'm not calling you a pedophile here. Just stating that you're using the exact same logical fallacies that one uses, and it's very telling of your own mental state.
At this point I can only sincerely hope that you will consider what I've said to you, and not let your parental decisions be dictated by your fetish.
actually 99% of damage to a childs syche comes from lack of an explanation as to why your doing something they deem as being punished, or rewarded, etc
to force ANYTHING on anyone, without a healthy reason, is obviously sick and twisted, you must decide IF the time is right. me personally? my SYCHE is so strong that i alter reality. sonic ? yep babyfurs? yep? oppan gannam style? yep.
we change reality by looking at what we see before us, then looking lightly to the side and seeing what we want to happen with it.
my current DESTINATION with babyfurism, and you cant stop me, is to bridge the gap between needing diapers at 4 and needing diapers at 104 - in other words people stay in diapers.. the positive reasons?
a:: people will have to change eachother,
a why: this will stop pedophelia, rape, and female cruelty, because its seen very commonly the parts of the other age and gender, the body does not rage from the denial of being seen it. and so treats gender and age mutually- with respect. obviously nude beaches arent an option during cold climate, and theres to many drugs in the food to keep people calm for the duration of winter otherwise (rape etc spike during locked down winter times)
b:: there will be no oppression for the minority of those who cant control themselves already and the elderly
b why: this removes hate from old people because people will be on the same level, therefore they cannot stereotype them
c:: its a logical sex shield
c why: actions such as slapping a diaper dont really upset people, because it doesnt cause pain, and yet it notifies someone they think there sexy, and so decreases the amount of people calling sex charges at work and such - in other words not a single cell of dna was harmed.
d:: not only are they confortable, but they they shield bikers and female walkers from long arduous stress
d why: self explanatory.
im going to copy this into my journal.
to force ANYTHING on anyone, without a healthy reason, is obviously sick and twisted, you must decide IF the time is right. me personally? my SYCHE is so strong that i alter reality. sonic ? yep babyfurs? yep? oppan gannam style? yep.
we change reality by looking at what we see before us, then looking lightly to the side and seeing what we want to happen with it.
my current DESTINATION with babyfurism, and you cant stop me, is to bridge the gap between needing diapers at 4 and needing diapers at 104 - in other words people stay in diapers.. the positive reasons?
a:: people will have to change eachother,
a why: this will stop pedophelia, rape, and female cruelty, because its seen very commonly the parts of the other age and gender, the body does not rage from the denial of being seen it. and so treats gender and age mutually- with respect. obviously nude beaches arent an option during cold climate, and theres to many drugs in the food to keep people calm for the duration of winter otherwise (rape etc spike during locked down winter times)
b:: there will be no oppression for the minority of those who cant control themselves already and the elderly
b why: this removes hate from old people because people will be on the same level, therefore they cannot stereotype them
c:: its a logical sex shield
c why: actions such as slapping a diaper dont really upset people, because it doesnt cause pain, and yet it notifies someone they think there sexy, and so decreases the amount of people calling sex charges at work and such - in other words not a single cell of dna was harmed.
d:: not only are they confortable, but they they shield bikers and female walkers from long arduous stress
d why: self explanatory.
im going to copy this into my journal.
This post is so incredibly stupid in so many ways that I can't even begin to tell you how incredibly stupid it is. Suffice it to say I could easily crush ever point you attempted to make with but a few sentences.
I honestly can't discern if you're trolling, or are just that truly moronic. I think I'm gonna side with the latter, though.
I honestly can't discern if you're trolling, or are just that truly moronic. I think I'm gonna side with the latter, though.
See, I've never been fond of sugarcoating things, as I feel that it dulls down the message, especially in times where the harsh reality really needs to be conveyed. I'm not one who enjoys stirring up drama, but there are legitimate times in which drama does need to be stirred up. That being said, however, there's no reason you can't be kind about it, even if you are being blunt.
You shouldnt had to mention what you dislike about this pic, especially what the dislike was. Even though there's no reason nor explanation, it kinda made felt alil offended on how you dislike a close friend of mine...
My apologizes for commenting on what I just said but I had to, how you say, let it out? But yeah, you have your own reason nor I want to fight about (since thats what I'm fearing about) so Im very sorry. ^^;;
My apologizes for commenting on what I just said but I had to, how you say, let it out? But yeah, you have your own reason nor I want to fight about (since thats what I'm fearing about) so Im very sorry. ^^;;
Comments