Got an Furry Network account? You might want to reconsider..
10 years ago
General
"A word of encouragement during a failure is worth more than an hour of praise after success." - Unknown.
Furry Network, I had really hoped that this site would be a great alternative to FA. But with in an instant, these hopes were quickly dashed. It's be confirmed that Furry Network will allow cub porn on their site (link below from FN's twitter account), which means I'm staying hell of way from there. It doesn't matter if it's correct tagged or not, the fact that type of art exists on there and the fact that I'd could possibly be interacting with a few people on there who takes pleasure in that sort of stuff freaks me out. The fact that FN also said they allow 'legal content' including 'cub' has also raised red flags since many people whom have already replied to this tweet have stated that it's still a legal grey area and that it is widely believed by many people (including myself) to be pedophilla which I shouldn't need to explain to you just how severely illegal that is.
Now, I'm not gonna say that you must all stop using FN. If you want to use it then so be it, I am not going to change my views about you. But I just thought to let you guys know about this situation.
LINK: https://twitter.com/FurryNetwork/st.....15464625643524
FA+

I personally did not enjoy being raped by my father, so the images portrayed of characters willing to take Daddy's "BIG YUMMY COCK" is unrealistic and not something kids "crave" unless they have been groomed to believe so.
I am sorry that you feel the need to defend cub porn because you might have a liking for such a thing -- and that's fine. But, this person has all the right in the world to warn and express an opinion on this situation just like you felt the need to.
Some people just really don't want to go onto a website to see a cub being raped in 5 different directions. I mean, I don't. So I steer clear away from inkbunny or e621.
I don't think cub porn has its place on a "typical" site dedicated to consenting adults with adult characters -- maybe somewhere specialized, but I don't think it needs to be on a budding site trying to curbstomp FA, which needs it. Badly.
So I guess we should open the pool for folks like you because otherwise you can't get your rocks off -- and that's a bad thing? Damn. I'm so prejeduced. Blindly prejeduced because I can't accept that others actual fantasize about molesting kids.
Man. The world sure does seem to want to revolve around your fetishes, but when someone vocalizes that it freaks them out they could be talking to fantasy-pedos, it means he's being A BIG MEANIE FACE. AND WE SHOULDNT BE SO SELFISH TO CLOSE OFF KIDS GETTING DICKED. MAN.
Dude. Take it standing up, then. But your disgust and shock at others not enjoying the idea someone fantasizes fucking kids shouldn't actually surprise you.
Sure.
You do you, man. Just keep your fantasies as they are: in your head.
Thanks!
"Please spare us the moral hair splitting and kink shaming." I'm sorry, I didn't realize that the idea of me briefly saying that I don't like the idea of see visual representations of children being used as sexual objects on my own journal would be so offensive, I mean silly me for even dare thinking that seeing a little kid being raped is not pleasant. How rude of me. This is my opinion and I have solid grounds for it. Plus, I never preached that all people should go out and destroy all the cub porn and belittle all the people who enjoyed it, so stop acting like I did.
"Speaking such opinions so openly and freely has the power to affect and intimidate young, impressionable minds." So we should just suppress one opinion and just let your opinion be the only thing people are allowed to hear, eh? Dude, it's called freedom of speech and it exists for a reason. What you are promoting is the idea of censoring any opinions or ideas you don't like so you can be forever unchallenged on your views and interests, what a horrible place the world would be if that was ever the case.
"One person's abuse story does not mean we need to close the pool for everyone else." And when did we ever mention anything like that? I said I wanted to stay the hell away from cub porn as possible and was just warning people who want to do the same, I never intended for anyone to stop. If you want to enjoy cub porn, then whatever I'm not gonna stop you but just keep it the fuck away from me.
"If you applied the same rationale to general furry porn as you are applying to cub porn, then the general furry porn may as well be bestiality. " Bestiality is the equivalent of receiving a speeding ticket when compared to the harsh sentences of child pornography in a legal sense, plus it's legal to draw bestiality, it is however not legal to draw child pornography so don't compare the two, they are not in the same league.
"If Furry Network is based in the United States and viewed by users in the United States, then it's legal." Unless you have a link to a legal document or case that clearly states that anthropomorphized animals or humanoid characters are excluded from child pornography laws, then it's not proven legal. You're not a supreme court judge and nor am I, because of this neither of us truly know the actual boundaries of these laws are. If you believe it's then legal then fine, but I firmly believe it's illegal especially since I live in a country that has much tighter child protection laws than the USA. But do remember that even cartoonish pictures of minors count as pedophilla,( LINK: http://teh-fennec.tumblr.com/post/1.....from-comics-or )
I could go on further, but I won't. I really don't want to enter an argument at them moment. So I'll leave you with this, go off and enjoy your cub porn. I ain't gonna stop you or do anything about it, I don't care as long as you keep it away from me.
Well, I never said that I fully agreed with the laws, I just stated that they currently existed and that people need to be wary of them.
I'll respect your opinion that this stuff shouldn't be illegal as you did present some valid points, though one thing that I'm sure with can both agree on is that these laws desperately need to be more clearly defined so this grey area can be reduced in the future.
Sorry if I did come off as harsh in my previous reply, I do sometimes get a little carried away with things like this and it wasn't my intent to personal insult you in any way.
http://theconversation.com/when-a-d.....-in-jail-33418
Thanks for the link.
Why is it that all sites but FA has proven to fall out? FW is the only possible alternative so far for me.
And I know, why can't a website just duplicate what FA is doing and not add things we don't want. XD
JESUS CHRIST! Why people insist over this damn thing? I doesn't matter if is just a drawing, a chibi, a furry character that supposedly doesn't exist in real life... Nothing justifies cub porn. The figure, the image of a infantile or slightly older kid having sex is freaking wrong!
Just take the paws, tail and fur off... And then you have it an actual human being rather than a humanoid, tell me... WHAT DOES MAKE IT DIFFERENT FROM ACTUAL PEDOPHILIA? Let me answer, nothing. I don't care how much retarded people cry over this, a child isn't supposed to have sex. A child shouldn't even know the damn meaning of the word, but unfortunately they do!
Congratulations FN, you claim to create a large community to let furries and artist of all-kind express themselves, but I've one thing to say: there is a damn screaming difference between art and perversity; art and crime; art and poorly excuse to commit something that isn't acceptable at all.
Now if you excuse me, bye. I'm leaving FN because I don't tolerate this thing, and I don't have to.