man on man action, not really.
15 years ago
General
copy pasta from my LJ:
another thing that's been on my mind lately: gay relationships. i'm wondering how hard it is to have a guy on guy relationship. from the friends that i have, i haven't really seen anything that seems lasting. and i have a lot of gay guy friends. now, just my own opinion on gay men in general; the "manly" ones seem to only want dick, as stereotypical male as that sounds. the "girly" ones actually look for a lasting, meaningful relationship. but! none of the pairs i've seen have worked out. manlyxmanly is usually perfect in the sense of each partner is looking for physical and personality traits that the other has. because each is taking on the "man" role though, there's no balance. now girlyxgirly doesn't work either. the "girly" gay male is usually looking for a "manly" gay, so to be with another "girl" would boarder on a lesbian relationship, only with dicks. now manlyxgirly doesn't seem to work either, because although the "woman" is with someone that is ideally burlesque, the "man" is looking for another "man". because he's gay. and if he's with "girl", then he might as well be with an actual girl. of course, there are always exceptions to the rules, and i've seen a lot. fictionally. but not with anyone that i actually know.
DISCUSS.
another thing that's been on my mind lately: gay relationships. i'm wondering how hard it is to have a guy on guy relationship. from the friends that i have, i haven't really seen anything that seems lasting. and i have a lot of gay guy friends. now, just my own opinion on gay men in general; the "manly" ones seem to only want dick, as stereotypical male as that sounds. the "girly" ones actually look for a lasting, meaningful relationship. but! none of the pairs i've seen have worked out. manlyxmanly is usually perfect in the sense of each partner is looking for physical and personality traits that the other has. because each is taking on the "man" role though, there's no balance. now girlyxgirly doesn't work either. the "girly" gay male is usually looking for a "manly" gay, so to be with another "girl" would boarder on a lesbian relationship, only with dicks. now manlyxgirly doesn't seem to work either, because although the "woman" is with someone that is ideally burlesque, the "man" is looking for another "man". because he's gay. and if he's with "girl", then he might as well be with an actual girl. of course, there are always exceptions to the rules, and i've seen a lot. fictionally. but not with anyone that i actually know.
DISCUSS.
FA+

Now I'll just climb down from my soapbox over here, excuse me...
thanks for your input~!
I think you're getting too fixated on assigning gender roles in search of a "balance" that doesn't (and shouldn't!) exist. The great thing about being in a gay relationship is that all of that baggage can be thrown out the window.
I think any relationship is hard in our culture because social conservatives want to bring back the patriarchy and the alternative is this chaotic amoral vacuum that encourages everything that is shallow and destructive and that doesn't contribute to lasting relationships. Many shades of gay culture are stuck in this vortex.
i guess what i'm really wanting to say is that these problems, from the people that i know, only seem to happen to the gay relationships. i have lesbian friends, straight friends, and most of them have very lasting relationships. so in the nitty gritty of it, i'm contemplating the male psyche and how it works in a homosexual relationship.
copy pasta: "i guess what i'm really wanting to say is that these problems, from the people that i know, only seem to happen to the gay relationships. i have lesbian friends, straight friends, and most of them have very lasting relationships. so in the nitty gritty of it, i'm contemplating the male psyche and how it works in a homosexual relationship."