I don't see the problem... It doesn't sound like it was done with the intention to titillate.

Neither was my MODEL SHEET (er, just talking about page 1, here) but it still got marked Mature for having nudity at all. Whether the intent was porn or not, the trolls will crawl out of the woodwork to claim it is, and scream and beat their chests that he MUST be abusing his daughter because he posts a nude of the character supposedly inspired by (not referenced from, but the trolls won't comprehend the difference) her.

Problem is, I don't know what a better idea would be, and the idea of refraining from posting something out of fear of the trolls just sticks in my craw.

Did he actually SAY these things all in one description, or did he mention the character as being inspired by his daughter on one, then post the nude later? Because the latter would be a good defense against trolls, since the two wouldn't tend to link up in their minds.

*headdesk*

Guy needs more *deskhead*

I think it must be gone--I went and had a look earlier by browsing and selecting "Babyfurs-Tame" as the category and species of Skunk, but it didn't show up when I looked again just now, so he probably took it down.

Confirmed gone--I figured out by going through my history whose page it was posted to... not going to say who to avoid drama, but it's definitely gone from that gallery.